Insecticide Efficacy in German Cockroach Control, 1992

C. G. Wright, H. Dupree
{"title":"Insecticide Efficacy in German Cockroach Control, 1992","authors":"C. G. Wright, H. Dupree","doi":"10.1093/iat/18.1.355a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Abamectin was applied into or near cracks and crevices with a Whitmire flowable dust applicator. Other forumulations were applied from self-pressurized, aerosol-type containers as pin-stream sprays into cracks and crevices. Single-family dwellings, located in Edgecombe or Lenoir counties, NC, served as test sites. Five kitchens with a minimum of 100 living German cockroaches sighted during a preliminary visual survey were assigned to each formulation. Preapplication visual tallies of living cockroaches in kitchens compared to tallies at specified intervals after treatment indicated efficacy. Insecticide reapplications were made in kitchens where any living cockroaches were observed during postapplication tallies. Non-test rooms in the dwellings were treated as needed at each visit to minimize movement of German cockroaches into treated areas. The amount of insecticide applied during the initial application and reapplications and the size, temperature, and relative humidity of the kitchens, were recorded. Analyses were based on % reduction of cockroaches (pre- versus post-treatment tallies for a kitchen). Since the area of each kitchen floor and wall space varied the active ingredient applied per kitchen was converted to a 50 m2 basis for comparative purposes. The active ingredient applied in the initial applications for all formulations ranged from 0.1 to 6.2 g and from 0.0 to 1.7 g for the reapplications, respectively. Smaller quantities of insecticide were used for the reapplications because partical cockroach control usually resulted from the initial applications.","PeriodicalId":13691,"journal":{"name":"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/iat/18.1.355a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abamectin was applied into or near cracks and crevices with a Whitmire flowable dust applicator. Other forumulations were applied from self-pressurized, aerosol-type containers as pin-stream sprays into cracks and crevices. Single-family dwellings, located in Edgecombe or Lenoir counties, NC, served as test sites. Five kitchens with a minimum of 100 living German cockroaches sighted during a preliminary visual survey were assigned to each formulation. Preapplication visual tallies of living cockroaches in kitchens compared to tallies at specified intervals after treatment indicated efficacy. Insecticide reapplications were made in kitchens where any living cockroaches were observed during postapplication tallies. Non-test rooms in the dwellings were treated as needed at each visit to minimize movement of German cockroaches into treated areas. The amount of insecticide applied during the initial application and reapplications and the size, temperature, and relative humidity of the kitchens, were recorded. Analyses were based on % reduction of cockroaches (pre- versus post-treatment tallies for a kitchen). Since the area of each kitchen floor and wall space varied the active ingredient applied per kitchen was converted to a 50 m2 basis for comparative purposes. The active ingredient applied in the initial applications for all formulations ranged from 0.1 to 6.2 g and from 0.0 to 1.7 g for the reapplications, respectively. Smaller quantities of insecticide were used for the reapplications because partical cockroach control usually resulted from the initial applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
杀虫剂对德国蜚蠊的防治效果,1992
阿维菌素应用于或接近裂缝和裂缝惠特米尔流动粉尘涂布器。其他配方应用于自加压的气溶胶型容器,作为针状流喷雾到裂缝和缝隙中。位于北卡罗来纳州Edgecombe或Lenoir县的单户住宅作为测试地点。在初步的视觉调查中,每个配方被分配到五个厨房,至少有100只活的德国蟑螂。应用前对厨房内活蟑螂的目视计数与处理后指定时间间隔内的计数进行了比较。在厨房重新施药,在施药后清点时发现有活蟑螂。在每次访问时,根据需要对住宅中的非测试房间进行处理,以尽量减少德国蟑螂进入处理区域的活动。记录了初次和再次施药时的杀虫剂用量以及厨房的大小、温度和相对湿度。分析是基于蟑螂减少的百分比(厨房处理前与处理后的统计)。由于每个厨房地板和墙壁空间的面积不同,每个厨房使用的有效成分被转换为50平方米的基础上进行比较。所有制剂初始应用的活性成分分别为0.1 - 6.2 g和0.0 - 1.7 g。由于蟑螂的局部控制通常是在第一次施用后产生的,因此在再次施用时使用的杀虫剂数量较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Control of Tobacco Wikeworms with Winter and Spring Applications of Lorsban, 1992: Rose Leafhopper Control, 1992 Efficacy of Insecticides on Black Cutworm in Bentgrass, 1992: Control of Arthropod Pests on Georgia Soybean, 1992: Control of Twospotted Spider Mite on Azuki Bean, 1992
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1