From Visuality to Visibility: Regime, Capital, Media

Q3 Arts and Humanities Art History and Criticism Pub Date : 2020-11-26 DOI:10.2478/mik-2020-0009
Žilvinė Gaižutytė-Filipavičienė
{"title":"From Visuality to Visibility: Regime, Capital, Media","authors":"Žilvinė Gaižutytė-Filipavičienė","doi":"10.2478/mik-2020-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Visibility is a capacity to be seen by others directly or through images and can be defined as a total social fact, which includes different domains of collective life. As Italian sociologist Andrea Mubi Brighenti argues, visibility is a form of “visuality at large” and the visible entails more than the visual, more than the sensorially perceptible, which becomes clear when we consider the fact that the visual itself needs to be visibilised, and examine the ways in which this happens. In the last decades visibility in a social sphere and media was largely “capitalised”. According to French sociologist Nathalie Heinich, the visibility capitalis firmly entrenched within Western society, culture and media. Non-material capital of visibility differs from other non-material symbolical or cultural capitals in Bourdieusian sense. This new phenomenon includes all features of classical material capital. The capital of visibility is measurable, accumulated, transmissible, earning interest and convertible. It can be measured by number of fans, showing results in Google search, number of views in YouTube, number of followers in social media Instagram, Facebook or number of images in other mass media. The cult of celebrity, the aspiration for visibility, and widespread practices of seeing within contemporary visual culture touched on many important social, political, cultural and intellectual spheres. Celebrity culture that arose out of the cinema industry underwent significant transformations, penetrated into existing social structures, fields and institutions. Visibility deeply changes cultural and intellectual life, influences our values and attitudes. The regime of visibility transforms social stratification by creating celebrities as a new social category called media elite. These persons are isolated from their original environment and placed in a context with its own logic and rules. These issues will be analysed using examples from the sphere of creative and cultural industries.","PeriodicalId":36225,"journal":{"name":"Art History and Criticism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art History and Criticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mik-2020-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Visibility is a capacity to be seen by others directly or through images and can be defined as a total social fact, which includes different domains of collective life. As Italian sociologist Andrea Mubi Brighenti argues, visibility is a form of “visuality at large” and the visible entails more than the visual, more than the sensorially perceptible, which becomes clear when we consider the fact that the visual itself needs to be visibilised, and examine the ways in which this happens. In the last decades visibility in a social sphere and media was largely “capitalised”. According to French sociologist Nathalie Heinich, the visibility capitalis firmly entrenched within Western society, culture and media. Non-material capital of visibility differs from other non-material symbolical or cultural capitals in Bourdieusian sense. This new phenomenon includes all features of classical material capital. The capital of visibility is measurable, accumulated, transmissible, earning interest and convertible. It can be measured by number of fans, showing results in Google search, number of views in YouTube, number of followers in social media Instagram, Facebook or number of images in other mass media. The cult of celebrity, the aspiration for visibility, and widespread practices of seeing within contemporary visual culture touched on many important social, political, cultural and intellectual spheres. Celebrity culture that arose out of the cinema industry underwent significant transformations, penetrated into existing social structures, fields and institutions. Visibility deeply changes cultural and intellectual life, influences our values and attitudes. The regime of visibility transforms social stratification by creating celebrities as a new social category called media elite. These persons are isolated from their original environment and placed in a context with its own logic and rules. These issues will be analysed using examples from the sphere of creative and cultural industries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从视觉性到可见性:政权、资本、媒体
可见性是一种被他人直接或通过图像看到的能力,可以定义为一个整体的社会事实,包括集体生活的不同领域。正如意大利社会学家Andrea Mubi Brighenti所说,可见性是一种“视觉性”,可见性比视觉性更重要,比感官可感知的更重要,当我们考虑到视觉本身需要被可见的事实时,这一点就变得清晰起来,并研究了这种情况发生的方式。在过去的几十年里,社交领域和媒体的知名度基本上被“资本化”了。法国社会学家Nathalie Heinich认为,知名度资本在西方社会、文化和媒体中根深蒂固。可见性的非物质资本不同于布尔迪乌意义上的其他非物质象征资本或文化资本。这种新现象包含了古典物质资本的所有特征。可见性资本具有可测量性、积累性、可传递性、收益性和可兑换性。它可以通过粉丝数量来衡量,在谷歌搜索中显示的结果,在YouTube上的观看次数,在社交媒体Instagram, Facebook上的粉丝数量或在其他大众媒体上的图片数量。在当代视觉文化中,对名人的崇拜,对知名度的渴望,以及广泛的观看实践,触及了许多重要的社会、政治、文化和知识领域。从电影产业中产生的名人文化经历了重大变革,渗透到现有的社会结构、领域和制度中。可见性深刻地改变了文化和精神生活,影响了我们的价值观和态度。通过将名人塑造成一个被称为媒体精英的新社会类别,可见性制度改变了社会分层。这些人脱离了他们原来的环境,被置于一个有自己的逻辑和规则的环境中。这些问题将使用创意和文化产业领域的例子进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Art History and Criticism
Art History and Criticism Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Watercolours and Drawings of Count Konstanty Tyzenhauz – the Romanticised Testimony of the Time Modernist Genius in the Light of the Reception of Georgia O’Keeffe’s Work A Critique on Authenticity and Integrity in Reconstruction: Perception of Architectural Heritage and Cities of Postwar Era from Europe Adaptations of Prosper Mérimée’s “The Bear” in Different Media and Genres: Correction and Recontextualization The Church of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Chicago: A Complicated Story of the Search for Lithuanian Identity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1