Correction of Threshold Determination in Rapid-Guessing Behaviour Detection

Inf. Comput. Pub Date : 2023-07-21 DOI:10.3390/info14070422
Muhammad Alfian, Umi Laili Yuhana, E. Pardede, Akbar Noto Ponco Bimantoro
{"title":"Correction of Threshold Determination in Rapid-Guessing Behaviour Detection","authors":"Muhammad Alfian, Umi Laili Yuhana, E. Pardede, Akbar Noto Ponco Bimantoro","doi":"10.3390/info14070422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment is one benchmark in measuring students’ abilities. However, assessment results cannot necessarily be trusted, because students sometimes cheat or even guess in answering the questions. Therefore, to obtain valid results, it is necessary to separate valid and invalid answers by considering rapid-guessing behaviour. We conducted a test to record exam log data from undergraduate and postgraduate students to model rapid-guessing behaviour by determining the threshold response time. Rapid-guessing behaviour detection is inspired by the common k-second method. However, the method flattens the application of the threshold, thus allowing misclassification. The modified method considers item difficulty in determining the threshold. The evaluation results show that the system can identify students’ rapid-guessing behaviour with a success rate of 71%, which is superior to the previous method. We also analysed various aggregation techniques of response time and compared them to see the effect of selecting the aggregation technique.","PeriodicalId":13622,"journal":{"name":"Inf. Comput.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inf. Comput.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/info14070422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Assessment is one benchmark in measuring students’ abilities. However, assessment results cannot necessarily be trusted, because students sometimes cheat or even guess in answering the questions. Therefore, to obtain valid results, it is necessary to separate valid and invalid answers by considering rapid-guessing behaviour. We conducted a test to record exam log data from undergraduate and postgraduate students to model rapid-guessing behaviour by determining the threshold response time. Rapid-guessing behaviour detection is inspired by the common k-second method. However, the method flattens the application of the threshold, thus allowing misclassification. The modified method considers item difficulty in determining the threshold. The evaluation results show that the system can identify students’ rapid-guessing behaviour with a success rate of 71%, which is superior to the previous method. We also analysed various aggregation techniques of response time and compared them to see the effect of selecting the aggregation technique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快速猜测行为检测中阈值确定的修正
评估是衡量学生能力的一个基准。然而,评估结果不一定是可信的,因为学生有时在回答问题时作弊甚至猜测。因此,为了获得有效的结果,有必要考虑到快速猜测行为,将有效答案和无效答案分开。我们进行了一项测试,记录了本科生和研究生的考试日志数据,通过确定阈值响应时间来模拟快速猜测行为。快速猜测行为检测的灵感来自于常见的k秒方法。然而,该方法使阈值的应用扁平化,从而允许误分类。改进后的方法在确定阈值时考虑了项目难度。评价结果表明,该系统能够识别学生的快速猜词行为,成功率为71%,优于之前的方法。我们还分析了响应时间的各种聚合技术,并对它们进行了比较,以了解选择聚合技术的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Traceable Constant-Size Multi-authority Credentials Pspace-Completeness of the Temporal Logic of Sub-Intervals and Suffixes Employee Productivity Assessment Using Fuzzy Inference System Correction of Threshold Determination in Rapid-Guessing Behaviour Detection Combining Classifiers for Deep Learning Mask Face Recognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1