4CPS-380 An integrated pharmacist led medication review service for elective surgery patients at the pre-anaesthesia outpatient clinic

W. Kappaun, G. Stemer, D. Baron, M. Anditsch
{"title":"4CPS-380 An integrated pharmacist led medication review service for elective surgery patients at the pre-anaesthesia outpatient clinic","authors":"W. Kappaun, G. Stemer, D. Baron, M. Anditsch","doi":"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importance Drug related problems (DRPs) (eg, untreated indication, drug–drug interactions (DDIs) and contraindicated medicines) significantly contribute to patient harm. Especially in surgical departments, DRPs often represent a significant threat to patient safety. Therefore, an integrated pharmacist led medication review service was initiated at the pre-anaesthesia outpatient clinic of a 1700 bed tertiary care centre. Aim and objectives The aim was to evaluate the impact of medication reviews prior to elective surgery, quantitatively and qualitatively, by describing DRPs, pharmaceutical interventions and their acceptance rate. Material and methods During the 5 month study period, patients undergoing elective surgery were prioritised by age and anaesthesia risk score, after their preoperative evaluation. Their medication regimens and further relevant data (eg, laboratory values, comorbidities) were reviewed. In the case of inconsistencies, patients were called to amend and verify their current regimens. Identified DRPs and corresponding interventions were suggested in written form to the respective surgical department. A follow-up of interventions was performed by retrospective analysis of patients’ discharge letters. Results Medication reviews were performed in 1281 patients (51% women, 64±18 years of age). A total of 1742 DRPs were identified in 700 (54,6%) patients, accounting for an average of 2.5 DRPs per patient. The three most common DRPs, apart from the need for specific medication information (27% of patients), were potential DDIs (7.1%), non-conformity to therapeutic guidelines (5.6%) and untreated indications (5.5%). The three most common interventions were the provision of medication related information (49.7%), the recommendation of additional medicines (11.1%) and patient monitoring (10%). 52% of interventions were accepted, while a high proportion of interventions were lost to follow-up. Conclusion and relevance The study results showed that pharmacist led medication reviews prior to surgery significantly contributed to the prevention of DRPs. Inappropriate and incomplete information in the medical record was commonly encountered as a barrier to the interventions. The moderate acceptance rate needs to be analysed further (eg, acceptance rate per intervention categories) and strategies to optimise approval of recommendations need to be discussed with different surgery departments. References and/or acknowledgements The performance of medication reviews by all pharmacists of the clinical pharmacy department is acknowledged. Conflict of interest No conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":11998,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and importance Drug related problems (DRPs) (eg, untreated indication, drug–drug interactions (DDIs) and contraindicated medicines) significantly contribute to patient harm. Especially in surgical departments, DRPs often represent a significant threat to patient safety. Therefore, an integrated pharmacist led medication review service was initiated at the pre-anaesthesia outpatient clinic of a 1700 bed tertiary care centre. Aim and objectives The aim was to evaluate the impact of medication reviews prior to elective surgery, quantitatively and qualitatively, by describing DRPs, pharmaceutical interventions and their acceptance rate. Material and methods During the 5 month study period, patients undergoing elective surgery were prioritised by age and anaesthesia risk score, after their preoperative evaluation. Their medication regimens and further relevant data (eg, laboratory values, comorbidities) were reviewed. In the case of inconsistencies, patients were called to amend and verify their current regimens. Identified DRPs and corresponding interventions were suggested in written form to the respective surgical department. A follow-up of interventions was performed by retrospective analysis of patients’ discharge letters. Results Medication reviews were performed in 1281 patients (51% women, 64±18 years of age). A total of 1742 DRPs were identified in 700 (54,6%) patients, accounting for an average of 2.5 DRPs per patient. The three most common DRPs, apart from the need for specific medication information (27% of patients), were potential DDIs (7.1%), non-conformity to therapeutic guidelines (5.6%) and untreated indications (5.5%). The three most common interventions were the provision of medication related information (49.7%), the recommendation of additional medicines (11.1%) and patient monitoring (10%). 52% of interventions were accepted, while a high proportion of interventions were lost to follow-up. Conclusion and relevance The study results showed that pharmacist led medication reviews prior to surgery significantly contributed to the prevention of DRPs. Inappropriate and incomplete information in the medical record was commonly encountered as a barrier to the interventions. The moderate acceptance rate needs to be analysed further (eg, acceptance rate per intervention categories) and strategies to optimise approval of recommendations need to be discussed with different surgery departments. References and/or acknowledgements The performance of medication reviews by all pharmacists of the clinical pharmacy department is acknowledged. Conflict of interest No conflict of interest
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
4CPS-380综合药师主导麻醉前门诊择期手术患者的药物审查服务
背景和重要性药物相关问题(DRPs)(例如,未经治疗的指征、药物相互作用(ddi)和禁忌症药物)是造成患者伤害的重要因素。特别是在外科部门,drp通常对患者安全构成重大威胁。因此,在一家拥有1700张床位的三级保健中心的麻醉前门诊,开始了一项由药剂师主导的综合药物审查服务。目的和目的通过描述DRPs、药物干预及其接受率,定量和定性地评估择期手术前药物审查的影响。材料与方法在5个月的研究期间,择期手术患者在术前评估后,根据年龄和麻醉风险评分进行优先排序。回顾了他们的用药方案和进一步的相关数据(如实验室值、合并症)。在不一致的情况下,患者被要求修改和验证他们目前的方案。确定的drp和相应的干预措施以书面形式建议各自的外科部门。通过对患者出院信进行回顾性分析,对干预措施进行随访。结果1281例患者(女性占51%,年龄64±18岁)进行了用药回顾。700例(54.6%)患者共发现1742个DRPs,平均每例患者2.5个DRPs。除了需要特定的药物信息(27%的患者)外,三个最常见的drp是潜在的ddi(7.1%),不符合治疗指南(5.6%)和未经治疗的指征(5.5%)。最常见的三种干预措施是提供药物相关信息(49.7%)、推荐额外药物(11.1%)和患者监测(10%)。52%的干预措施被接受,而高比例的干预措施因随访而丢失。结论及相关性研究结果表明,药师主导的术前用药回顾对DRPs的预防有显著作用。医疗记录中不适当和不完整的信息经常成为干预措施的障碍。中等接受率需要进一步分析(例如,每个干预类别的接受率),并需要与不同的外科讨论优化推荐批准的策略。参考文献和/或致谢临床药学部门所有药剂师的药物评审表现得到认可。利益冲突无利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pharmacoeconomic and clinical impact of pharmaceutical service in the intensive care unit: a systematic review Assessment of particle contamination in vancomycin syringe pumps following fluid withdrawal using three diverse aseptic reconstitution techniques Comparative analysis of the prevalence 3-HIT concept in people living with HIV and seronegative patients with chronic conditions. Cross-3HIT Project. Adverse drug effect in the context of drug shortage: the CIRUPT prospective study from the French pharmacovigilance network Investigation of the hospital pharmacy profession in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1