The ethical challenge of Big Tech’s “disruptive philanthropy”

P. Manning, N. Baker, Peter Stokes
{"title":"The ethical challenge of Big Tech’s “disruptive philanthropy”","authors":"P. Manning, N. Baker, Peter Stokes","doi":"10.1080/00208825.2020.1811522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article provides a review of research into global philanthropy and the disruptive practices of new technology companies. In this article we detail how “Big Tech” has created a new marketization of philanthropy, based on its sectoral values of innovation, entrepreneurialism and focus on financial and performance metrics. Consequently, we argue for a new ontology of philanthropy that acknowledges marketization as its guiding principle. The study examines and compares different market-focused, philanthropic paradigms, which have evolved through the business values of Big Tech and examines their moral motivations. The topic is viewed through the lens of ‘hybrid organizations’; a model for nonprofit entities and social businesses which, in turn, are seeking a market-oriented pathway of balancing the twin demands of managing mission and money. A conceptual framework is then provided to inform practitioners in nonprofit organizations about the issues and risks of engaging with the new types of philanthropy, to which we collectively refer as ‘disruptive philanthropy’. The article concludes by recommending further research into the ethics of Big Tech to understand the true motivations behind its philanthropic practices at a time when the sector is under intense governmental and media scrutiny.","PeriodicalId":55644,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL STUDIES OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION","volume":"34 1","pages":"271 - 290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL STUDIES OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2020.1811522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract This article provides a review of research into global philanthropy and the disruptive practices of new technology companies. In this article we detail how “Big Tech” has created a new marketization of philanthropy, based on its sectoral values of innovation, entrepreneurialism and focus on financial and performance metrics. Consequently, we argue for a new ontology of philanthropy that acknowledges marketization as its guiding principle. The study examines and compares different market-focused, philanthropic paradigms, which have evolved through the business values of Big Tech and examines their moral motivations. The topic is viewed through the lens of ‘hybrid organizations’; a model for nonprofit entities and social businesses which, in turn, are seeking a market-oriented pathway of balancing the twin demands of managing mission and money. A conceptual framework is then provided to inform practitioners in nonprofit organizations about the issues and risks of engaging with the new types of philanthropy, to which we collectively refer as ‘disruptive philanthropy’. The article concludes by recommending further research into the ethics of Big Tech to understand the true motivations behind its philanthropic practices at a time when the sector is under intense governmental and media scrutiny.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科技巨头“颠覆性慈善”的伦理挑战
摘要本文综述了全球慈善研究和新技术公司的颠覆性实践。在这篇文章中,我们详细介绍了“大科技”如何基于其创新、创业精神和对财务和绩效指标的关注的行业价值观,创造了一种新的慈善市场化。因此,我们主张建立一种新的慈善本体论,承认市场化是其指导原则。该研究考察和比较了不同的以市场为中心的慈善模式,这些模式是通过大型科技公司的商业价值观演变而来的,并考察了它们的道德动机。这个话题是通过“混合组织”的视角来看待的;这是一个非营利机构和社会企业的模式,它们反过来正在寻求一条以市场为导向的道路,以平衡管理使命和资金的双重需求。然后提供了一个概念性框架,告知非营利组织的从业人员参与新型慈善事业的问题和风险,我们将其统称为“破坏性慈善”。文章最后建议进一步研究大型科技公司的道德规范,以了解其慈善行为背后的真正动机,目前该行业正受到政府和媒体的密切关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
“Homeward bound”: a systematic review of the repatriation literature Orientation and mental representations in the decision-making process: a comparison between junior and senior professional It’s the hierarchy, stupid: Varying perceptions of organizational culture between demographic groups The influence of synchronization of HR and PR practices in developing a strong CSR culture Bringing veganism to the wardrobe: examining consumers’ intention to buy vegan leather
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1