Optimal Selection of Dam Governance Scheme based on AHP and Multi-Objective Programming Model

Zhao Qing-ju
{"title":"Optimal Selection of Dam Governance Scheme based on AHP and Multi-Objective Programming Model","authors":"Zhao Qing-ju","doi":"10.22606/MCSE.2018.22003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the dam management program, here are generally three options: the first to repair an existing dam, the second to rebuild a dam, the third type is to delete the original large dam and to replace the large dam with a series of small dams along the river.Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a model based on safety, cost, power generation, irrigation ability and ecological influence is established. The model is solved by using MATLAB and the consistency test is carried out. Finally, the weights are calculated and ranked according to AHP. The optimal solution was evaluated by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).Then the case study of Kariba Dam is carried out. The results of the first and the third schemes are very close. Therefore, in order to further analyze the accuracy of the AHP results, we will focus on the comparison of schemes 1 and 3 with a detailed analysis of the third scheme. A multi-objective planning model with a minimum number of dams and a minimum construction cost is established. The model takes into account such factors as the amount of power generated, water capacity, and the number of dams. Finally, LINGO is used to solve the model. In data collection, some dams do not have accurate information, and regression equations are established by using known information to predict other information through EXCEL fitting, finally obtaining the optimal solution. Finally, the accuracy, applicability and flexibility of AHP results are verified.","PeriodicalId":100659,"journal":{"name":"IMPACT of Computing in Science and Engineering","volume":"42 1","pages":"25-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IMPACT of Computing in Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22606/MCSE.2018.22003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the dam management program, here are generally three options: the first to repair an existing dam, the second to rebuild a dam, the third type is to delete the original large dam and to replace the large dam with a series of small dams along the river.Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a model based on safety, cost, power generation, irrigation ability and ecological influence is established. The model is solved by using MATLAB and the consistency test is carried out. Finally, the weights are calculated and ranked according to AHP. The optimal solution was evaluated by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).Then the case study of Kariba Dam is carried out. The results of the first and the third schemes are very close. Therefore, in order to further analyze the accuracy of the AHP results, we will focus on the comparison of schemes 1 and 3 with a detailed analysis of the third scheme. A multi-objective planning model with a minimum number of dams and a minimum construction cost is established. The model takes into account such factors as the amount of power generated, water capacity, and the number of dams. Finally, LINGO is used to solve the model. In data collection, some dams do not have accurate information, and regression equations are established by using known information to predict other information through EXCEL fitting, finally obtaining the optimal solution. Finally, the accuracy, applicability and flexibility of AHP results are verified.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于AHP和多目标规划模型的大坝治理方案优化选择
对于大坝管理方案,一般有三种选择:第一种是修复现有的大坝,第二种是重建大坝,第三种是删除原有的大坝,用一系列沿江的小水坝来取代大坝。基于层次分析法(AHP),建立了基于安全性、成本、发电量、灌溉能力和生态影响的模型。利用MATLAB对模型进行了求解,并进行了一致性检验。最后,根据层次分析法计算权重并进行排序。采用层次分析法(AHP)对最优解进行评价。然后对卡里巴大坝进行了实例分析。第一种方案和第三种方案的结果非常接近。因此,为了进一步分析AHP结果的准确性,我们将重点对方案1和方案3进行比较,并对方案3进行详细分析。建立了坝数最少、造价最低的多目标规划模型。该模型考虑了诸如发电量、水量和水坝数量等因素。最后利用LINGO对模型进行求解。在数据收集中,有些大坝没有准确的信息,利用已知信息通过EXCEL拟合建立回归方程,预测其他信息,最终得到最优解。最后,验证了层次分析法结果的准确性、适用性和灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Interaction between an Edge and an Embedded Parallel Crack in a Structural Component Notice of Retraction: Smart City Priority Correlation Using Differential Equation Automated Binocular Vision Measurement of Food Dimensions and Volume for Dietary Evaluation Intelligent Information Processing Software Engineering for Computational Science: Past, Present, Future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1