Promoting Green Energy Through EU Preferential Trade Agreements: Potential and Limitations

G. M. Durán, Ilaria Espa
{"title":"Promoting Green Energy Through EU Preferential Trade Agreements: Potential and Limitations","authors":"G. M. Durán, Ilaria Espa","doi":"10.54648/leie2020006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims at assessing the potential and limitations of preferential trade agreements (PTAs) in safeguarding countries’ efforts to promote renewable energy (RE). In particular, it explores whether and to what extent PTAs recently concluded by the European Union (EU) have addressed the main shortcomings found under the World Trade Organization (WTO) law. Namely, the fact that WTO rules are currently too stringent on the use of RE subsidies while too lenient on the use of trade remedy measures against RE technologies. It argues that EU PTAs could and should have gone further with regards to both subsidy and trade remedy disciplines that enable RE promotion, substantively as well procedurally, while still remaining WTO-compatible. The article further finds that much of the potential of EU PTAs has remained untapped due to inconsistency in policy practice, which reflects the lack of a coherent, ambitious and forward-looking negotiating strategy on the part of the EU. The article concludes by identifying which approach to RE promotion in PTAs is preferable and should be consistently pursued by the EU in future negotiations.\nClimate change mitigation, renewable energy promotion, WTO law, green policy space, preferential trade agreements, EU","PeriodicalId":42718,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2020006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article aims at assessing the potential and limitations of preferential trade agreements (PTAs) in safeguarding countries’ efforts to promote renewable energy (RE). In particular, it explores whether and to what extent PTAs recently concluded by the European Union (EU) have addressed the main shortcomings found under the World Trade Organization (WTO) law. Namely, the fact that WTO rules are currently too stringent on the use of RE subsidies while too lenient on the use of trade remedy measures against RE technologies. It argues that EU PTAs could and should have gone further with regards to both subsidy and trade remedy disciplines that enable RE promotion, substantively as well procedurally, while still remaining WTO-compatible. The article further finds that much of the potential of EU PTAs has remained untapped due to inconsistency in policy practice, which reflects the lack of a coherent, ambitious and forward-looking negotiating strategy on the part of the EU. The article concludes by identifying which approach to RE promotion in PTAs is preferable and should be consistently pursued by the EU in future negotiations. Climate change mitigation, renewable energy promotion, WTO law, green policy space, preferential trade agreements, EU
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过欧盟优惠贸易协定促进绿色能源:潜力与局限
本文旨在评估优惠贸易协定(pta)在保护各国促进可再生能源(RE)方面的潜力和局限性。它特别探讨了欧洲联盟(欧盟)最近缔结的贸易协定是否以及在多大程度上解决了世界贸易组织(世贸组织)法律规定的主要缺点。也就是说,WTO规则目前对可再生能源补贴的使用过于严格,而对可再生能源技术使用贸易救济措施过于宽松。它认为,欧盟自由贸易协定可以而且应该在补贴和贸易救济纪律方面走得更远,从而在实质上和程序上促进可再生能源的发展,同时仍然与世贸组织保持一致。文章进一步发现,由于政策实践的不一致,欧盟自由贸易协定的大部分潜力仍未得到开发,这反映了欧盟缺乏连贯、雄心勃勃和前瞻性的谈判战略。文章最后确定了在自由贸易协定中促进可再生能源的哪种方法是可取的,并且应该在未来的谈判中得到欧盟的一贯追求。减缓气候变化,促进可再生能源,WTO法律,绿色政策空间,优惠贸易协定,欧盟
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
The EU’s Anti-coercion Instrument: A Return of Unlawful Unilateral Trade Countermeasures in Disguise? Editorial: Investment Protection in an Integrated Europe – The Non-Enforcement of Intra-EU Investment Arbitration Awards as the Ultimate Test Case for Strasbourg’s Deference Doctrines Why Do (High-Income) Countries Wish to Green Their Trade Agreements? The Application of Regulation 452/2019 in Response to Chinese Foreign Direct Investment The ESM Reform and Its Missing Legitimacy in Non-Euro Area Member States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1