Survey of the prevalence of bovine abortions and notification and management practices by veterinary practitioners in Algeria.

IF 1.9 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.20506/rst.39.3.3190
N. Djellata, A. Yahimi, C. Hanzen, C. Saegerman
{"title":"Survey of the prevalence of bovine abortions and notification and management practices by veterinary practitioners in Algeria.","authors":"N. Djellata, A. Yahimi, C. Hanzen, C. Saegerman","doi":"10.20506/rst.39.3.3190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whether the cause is infection or not, abortions result in major economic losses on Algerian cattle farms. However, little is known about their prevalence and the factors influencing their notification by Algerian veterinarians. In order to bridge this knowledge gap, an epidemiological survey was conducted between September 2014 and February 2016, in the form of direct interviews with 331 veterinarians randomly distributed in ten wilayas (regions) in northern and central Algeria. Influencing factors were analysed using a univariate, then multivariate, logistic regression model and a classification tree analysis. The statistical significance was set to 5% (p value of 0.05). According to 48.7% of the veterinarians interviewed, the average prevalence of abortions on the dairy farms monitored by each veterinarian during the past 12 months was greater than 5%. The results of the multivariate logistic regression model confirmed that abortion notification is far more systematic if accompanied by sampling for laboratory diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 467; confidence interval [CI] 95%: 56-3,897; p < 0.001). Conversely, notification is less frequent if the abortion occurred during the summer (OR = 0.14; CI 95%: 0.03-0.58; p = 0.007). The classification tree generated from the survey data indicates that the three variables most predictive of abortion notification are (in decreasing order of importance): sampling for laboratory analysis to identify the cause of abortions; the wilaya of origin; and the season during which the abortions occurred. Finally, an overall weighted score (on a scale of 0 to 100) was assigned to allow evaluation of the notification and management of bovine abortions by veterinarians. Evidently there is plenty of scope for improvement because two-thirds of veterinarians achieved scores between 0 and 25. Recommendations were made to improve notification and the management of bovine abortions in Algeria, including publishing an agreed standard procedure for abortions, conducting information and awareness-raising campaigns aimed at farmers and veterinarians and allocating additional resources to laboratory analysis of the causes of abortion and incentives to encourage notification of abortions. Another proposal was the creation of an agricultural fund to compensate cattle farmers for losses resulting from bovine abortions caused by notifiable diseases.","PeriodicalId":49596,"journal":{"name":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","volume":"98 1","pages":"947-968"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.39.3.3190","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Whether the cause is infection or not, abortions result in major economic losses on Algerian cattle farms. However, little is known about their prevalence and the factors influencing their notification by Algerian veterinarians. In order to bridge this knowledge gap, an epidemiological survey was conducted between September 2014 and February 2016, in the form of direct interviews with 331 veterinarians randomly distributed in ten wilayas (regions) in northern and central Algeria. Influencing factors were analysed using a univariate, then multivariate, logistic regression model and a classification tree analysis. The statistical significance was set to 5% (p value of 0.05). According to 48.7% of the veterinarians interviewed, the average prevalence of abortions on the dairy farms monitored by each veterinarian during the past 12 months was greater than 5%. The results of the multivariate logistic regression model confirmed that abortion notification is far more systematic if accompanied by sampling for laboratory diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 467; confidence interval [CI] 95%: 56-3,897; p < 0.001). Conversely, notification is less frequent if the abortion occurred during the summer (OR = 0.14; CI 95%: 0.03-0.58; p = 0.007). The classification tree generated from the survey data indicates that the three variables most predictive of abortion notification are (in decreasing order of importance): sampling for laboratory analysis to identify the cause of abortions; the wilaya of origin; and the season during which the abortions occurred. Finally, an overall weighted score (on a scale of 0 to 100) was assigned to allow evaluation of the notification and management of bovine abortions by veterinarians. Evidently there is plenty of scope for improvement because two-thirds of veterinarians achieved scores between 0 and 25. Recommendations were made to improve notification and the management of bovine abortions in Algeria, including publishing an agreed standard procedure for abortions, conducting information and awareness-raising campaigns aimed at farmers and veterinarians and allocating additional resources to laboratory analysis of the causes of abortion and incentives to encourage notification of abortions. Another proposal was the creation of an agricultural fund to compensate cattle farmers for losses resulting from bovine abortions caused by notifiable diseases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿尔及利亚兽医从业人员对牛流产流行率及通报和管理做法的调查。
无论原因是否感染,堕胎都给阿尔及利亚养牛场造成了重大经济损失。然而,对其流行情况和影响阿尔及利亚兽医通报的因素知之甚少。为了弥补这一知识差距,在2014年9月至2016年2月期间对随机分布在阿尔及利亚北部和中部十个省(地区)的331名兽医进行了流行病学调查。采用单因素、多因素、logistic回归模型和分类树分析对影响因素进行分析。统计学意义设为5% (p值为0.05)。48.7%的受访兽医表示,在过去12个月,每位兽医监测的奶牛场的平均堕胎率大于5%。多变量logistic回归模型的结果证实,如果伴有实验室诊断的抽样,流产通知将更加系统化(优势比[OR] = 467;置信区间[CI] 95%: 56-3,897;P < 0.001)。相反,如果流产发生在夏季,则通知频率较低(OR = 0.14;Ci 95%: 0.03-0.58;P = 0.007)。从调查数据生成的分类树表明,最能预测堕胎通知的三个变量是(按重要性降序排列):用于实验室分析以确定堕胎原因的抽样;原产的维拉亚;以及堕胎发生的季节。最后,分配了一个总体加权分数(在0到100的范围内),以允许兽医对牛流产的通知和管理进行评估。显然,还有很大的改进空间,因为三分之二的兽医得分在0到25之间。提出了改进阿尔及利亚牛流产通报和管理的建议,包括公布商定的流产标准程序,针对农民和兽医开展宣传和提高认识运动,分配额外资源用于流产原因的实验室分析和鼓励通报流产的奖励措施。另一项建议是设立一项农业基金,以补偿因法定疾病导致的牛流产给养牛户造成的损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scientific and Technical Review is a periodical publication containing scientific information that is updated constantly. The Review plays a significant role in fulfilling some of the priority functions of the OIE. This peer-reviewed journal contains in-depth studies devoted to current scientific and technical developments in animal health and veterinary public health worldwide, food safety and animal welfare. The Review benefits from the advice of an Advisory Editorial Board and a Scientific and Technical Committee composed of top scientists from across the globe.
期刊最新文献
Rinderpest and peste des petits ruminants: a century of progress and the future. Rinderpest and peste des petits ruminants: state of play in disease eradication efforts. The science of animal welfare in the One Health-One Welfare agenda: local solutions for global challenges. Shifting from wildlife disease threats to wildlife health. Strategic challenges in the global control of high pathogenicity avian influenza.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1