{"title":"How Great Was the “Great Divide of Nature and Culture” in Europe? Philippe Descola’s Argument under Scrutinity","authors":"J. Mathieu","doi":"10.3390/histories2040036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his much-discussed work Beyond Nature and Culture, anthropologist Philippe Descola gives central importance to the “great divide” between nature and culture in European history. According to him, the “naturalism” created by this gap is at the heart of Western modernity and distinguishes it from the “others” on the planet. One can certainly agree with Descola that the nature-culture dualism cannot claim universal validity. However, the extent of the “great divide” created in Europe by early modern “rationalist” scholarship remains unclear. Methodologically, one should not limit oneself to the narrow history of science and philosophy, but also examine the linguistic, religious, and social history.","PeriodicalId":41517,"journal":{"name":"Architectural Histories","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architectural Histories","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/histories2040036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
In his much-discussed work Beyond Nature and Culture, anthropologist Philippe Descola gives central importance to the “great divide” between nature and culture in European history. According to him, the “naturalism” created by this gap is at the heart of Western modernity and distinguishes it from the “others” on the planet. One can certainly agree with Descola that the nature-culture dualism cannot claim universal validity. However, the extent of the “great divide” created in Europe by early modern “rationalist” scholarship remains unclear. Methodologically, one should not limit oneself to the narrow history of science and philosophy, but also examine the linguistic, religious, and social history.
人类学家菲利普·德斯科拉(Philippe Descola)在其备受讨论的著作《超越自然与文化》(Beyond Nature and Culture)中,强调了欧洲历史上自然与文化之间的“巨大鸿沟”。根据他的说法,这种差距所产生的“自然主义”是西方现代性的核心,并将其与地球上的“其他”区分开来。我们当然可以同意德斯科拉的观点,即自然-文化二元论不能宣称具有普遍有效性。然而,早期现代“理性主义”学术在欧洲造成的“大鸿沟”的程度仍不清楚。在方法论上,人们不应把自己局限于狭隘的科学史和哲学史,而应考察语言史、宗教史和社会史。