A Survey of Price Risk Management in the Australian Cotton Industry

IF 0.3 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Australasian Agribusiness Review Pub Date : 2004-01-01 DOI:10.22004/AG.ECON.126106
T. Ada, B. Malcolm, John Williams
{"title":"A Survey of Price Risk Management in the Australian Cotton Industry","authors":"T. Ada, B. Malcolm, John Williams","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.126106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over 95 per cent of Australian cotton producers have attempted to manage price risk at some time, using a range of management strategies. Nearly 60 per cent of Australian cotton producers surveyed in this study stated that price risk management had a positive effect on their farm business. Findings from the study suggest that price risk management is only one of a suite of business management tools. Strategic use of price risk management tools can have positive outcomes. A lack of understanding of price risk management and, more specifically, recent currency exchange losses and high production risks were the key contributing factors for the 21 per cent of the surveyed producers who stated that price risk management had a negative impact on their business.Approximately 10 per cent of the cotton producers surveyed operated dryland production systems. These producers often incurred a broader range of production risks, and the resulting production uncertainty inhibited effective use of some price risk management strategies. One in four of the surveyed cotton producers had an agriculture-related tertiary qualification, yet few (around five per cent) had undertaken any form of specialist price risk management training. The primary conclusion from the study is that the uptake and effectiveness of price risk management in the Australian cotton industry is constrained by the extent of producer experience, confidence and understanding of price risk management principles and processes.","PeriodicalId":41561,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Agribusiness Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Agribusiness Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.126106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Over 95 per cent of Australian cotton producers have attempted to manage price risk at some time, using a range of management strategies. Nearly 60 per cent of Australian cotton producers surveyed in this study stated that price risk management had a positive effect on their farm business. Findings from the study suggest that price risk management is only one of a suite of business management tools. Strategic use of price risk management tools can have positive outcomes. A lack of understanding of price risk management and, more specifically, recent currency exchange losses and high production risks were the key contributing factors for the 21 per cent of the surveyed producers who stated that price risk management had a negative impact on their business.Approximately 10 per cent of the cotton producers surveyed operated dryland production systems. These producers often incurred a broader range of production risks, and the resulting production uncertainty inhibited effective use of some price risk management strategies. One in four of the surveyed cotton producers had an agriculture-related tertiary qualification, yet few (around five per cent) had undertaken any form of specialist price risk management training. The primary conclusion from the study is that the uptake and effectiveness of price risk management in the Australian cotton industry is constrained by the extent of producer experience, confidence and understanding of price risk management principles and processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚棉花行业价格风险管理调查
超过95%的澳大利亚棉花生产商都曾尝试过利用一系列管理策略来管理价格风险。在这项研究中接受调查的近60%的澳大利亚棉花生产商表示,价格风险管理对他们的农场业务产生了积极影响。研究结果表明,价格风险管理只是一套商业管理工具之一。战略性地使用价格风险管理工具可以产生积极的结果。缺乏对价格风险管理的了解,更具体地说,最近的货币兑换损失和高生产风险是21%的受访生产商表示价格风险管理对其业务产生负面影响的关键因素。接受调查的棉花生产者中约有10%采用旱地生产系统。这些生产商往往面临更大范围的生产风险,由此产生的生产不确定性抑制了一些价格风险管理策略的有效使用。在接受调查的棉花生产商中,有四分之一拥有农业相关的高等教育资格,但很少(约5%)接受过任何形式的专业价格风险管理培训。从研究的主要结论是,在澳大利亚棉花行业的价格风险管理的吸收和有效性受到生产者的经验,信心和价格风险管理原则和过程的理解程度的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Agribusiness Review
Australasian Agribusiness Review AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring the Returns to Investment in RD&E in the WA Grains Industry Using Equilibrium Displacement Modelling Financing Agricultural Value Chain RDE: An Alternative Approach with Examples from the Red Meat Industry Updating and Recalibrating Equilibrium Displacement Models of the Australian Livestock Industries: Beef Taking Stock: Identifying the Growing Agricultural Service Sector in Australia Specifying and Testing an Equilibrium Displacement Model of the Coconut Market in Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1