Classification of financial instruments: accounting and control aspect

Olha Lukova
{"title":"Classification of financial instruments: accounting and control aspect","authors":"Olha Lukova","doi":"10.32317/2221-1055.202110081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to supplement the classification of financial instruments for accounting goals and its expert verification. Research methods. The following set of methods was used in the research process: dialectical - when learning the substantive features and essence of financial instruments; analysis and synthesis - in the study of the completeness of the classification of their species; induction and deduction - to deepen and supplement the classification features of financial instruments; monographic - in the systematization of knowledge about the types of financial instruments, their identification as objects of accounting and reporting; systematization - when filling the identified gaps in the grouping of financial instruments and building a comprehensive classification for accounting purposes and its expert verification. Research results. A significant number of classification options for the latter have been identified by studying specific financial instruments and the available methods of grouping them. It is established that not all existing classification features should be used in accounting, as the current arsenal of accounts and reporting forms does not allow recording such details. At the same time, some of the most common ways of grouping financial instruments leave some of their types out of the classification groups some of their classes. To eliminate the identified shortcomings, it is proposed to supplement the classification of financial instruments with new features \"according to the company's profile\" and \"according to the regularity of transactions with financial instruments.\" Scientific novelty. The classification of financial instruments has been improved, which differs from the well-known ones by highlighting new classification features \"by the profile of the enterprise\" and \"by the frequency of transactions with financial instruments\", which is based on an in-depth analysis of the features of disclosing information about them in the reporting and allows you to identify potentially risky accounting transactions that require expert verification. Practical significance. It consists of identifying incomplete classification groups of financial instruments, their supplementation, and the formation of new ones, which together aim to build a generalized accounting and reporting vision of financial assets, financial liabilities, and equity instruments to cover the accounting policies fully. Figs.: 1. Refs.: 17.","PeriodicalId":53051,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomika ta upravlinnia APK","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomika ta upravlinnia APK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202110081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to supplement the classification of financial instruments for accounting goals and its expert verification. Research methods. The following set of methods was used in the research process: dialectical - when learning the substantive features and essence of financial instruments; analysis and synthesis - in the study of the completeness of the classification of their species; induction and deduction - to deepen and supplement the classification features of financial instruments; monographic - in the systematization of knowledge about the types of financial instruments, their identification as objects of accounting and reporting; systematization - when filling the identified gaps in the grouping of financial instruments and building a comprehensive classification for accounting purposes and its expert verification. Research results. A significant number of classification options for the latter have been identified by studying specific financial instruments and the available methods of grouping them. It is established that not all existing classification features should be used in accounting, as the current arsenal of accounts and reporting forms does not allow recording such details. At the same time, some of the most common ways of grouping financial instruments leave some of their types out of the classification groups some of their classes. To eliminate the identified shortcomings, it is proposed to supplement the classification of financial instruments with new features "according to the company's profile" and "according to the regularity of transactions with financial instruments." Scientific novelty. The classification of financial instruments has been improved, which differs from the well-known ones by highlighting new classification features "by the profile of the enterprise" and "by the frequency of transactions with financial instruments", which is based on an in-depth analysis of the features of disclosing information about them in the reporting and allows you to identify potentially risky accounting transactions that require expert verification. Practical significance. It consists of identifying incomplete classification groups of financial instruments, their supplementation, and the formation of new ones, which together aim to build a generalized accounting and reporting vision of financial assets, financial liabilities, and equity instruments to cover the accounting policies fully. Figs.: 1. Refs.: 17.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融工具的分类:会计和控制方面
本文的目的是对会计目标金融工具的分类及其专家验证进行补充。研究方法。在研究过程中使用了以下一套方法:辨证法——在学习金融工具的实质特征和本质时;分析与综合——研究其物种分类的完整性;归纳与演绎——深化和补充金融工具的分类特征专著-对金融工具类型的知识进行系统化,将其识别为会计和报告的对象;系统化-填补金融工具分组中已确定的空白,并为会计目的及其专家验证建立全面的分类。研究的结果。通过研究具体的金融工具和对它们进行分组的现有方法,已确定了后者的大量分类选择。可以确定的是,并非所有现有的分类特征都应用于会计,因为目前的各种帐户和报告表格不允许记录这些细节。与此同时,一些最常见的金融工具分类方法将它们的一些类型排除在分类组之外。为了消除已发现的不足,建议在金融工具分类中补充“根据公司概况”和“根据金融工具交易的规律性”的新特征。科学的新奇。对金融工具的分类进行了改进,不同于众所周知的分类,突出了“根据企业概况”和“根据金融工具交易频率”的新分类特征,这是基于对报告中披露信息的特征的深入分析,允许您识别需要专家验证的潜在风险会计交易。现实意义。它包括识别金融工具的不完整分类组,对其进行补充,并形成新的分类组,这些分类组共同旨在建立金融资产、金融负债和权益工具的通用会计和报告愿景,以充分涵盖会计政策。无花果。: 1。参考文献。: 17。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Improving the system of university educational activity quality management Foreign trade in agri-food products between Ukraine and the United Kingdom of Great Britain Current challenges of agricultural trade liberalisation between Ukraine and the EU Socio-economic role and institutional capacity of family farms in the implementation of the sustainable development goals Assessment of risks and prospects of employment and income of the rural population of Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1