The Development and Pilot Evaluation of ECHO Mental Health for Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2022-11-20 DOI:10.1080/19315864.2022.2148789
Y. Lunsky, N. Bobbette, J. Durbin, Angela Gonzales, E. Grier, Renisha Iruthayanathan, Nadia Mia, C. Pereira, L. Steel, A. Thakur, K. Thomson, S. Sockalingam
{"title":"The Development and Pilot Evaluation of ECHO Mental Health for Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","authors":"Y. Lunsky, N. Bobbette, J. Durbin, Angela Gonzales, E. Grier, Renisha Iruthayanathan, Nadia Mia, C. Pereira, L. Steel, A. Thakur, K. Thomson, S. Sockalingam","doi":"10.1080/19315864.2022.2148789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction Health and social service providers have limited expertise with regard to assessing and treating psychiatric disorders in adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The aim of this study was to describe the development and pilot evaluation of a virtual capacity-building program (Project ECHO) focused on supporting the mental health of adults with these disabilities in Ontario, Canada. Method The pilot program consisted of 12 weekly 1.5 hour sessions hosted through a video-conferencing platform, with a combined focus of didactic teaching and case-based learning, led by an interprofessional team of subject matter experts. The program evaluation was informed by Moore’s evaluation framework for continuing medical education. Ongoing attendance tracking, weekly surveys, and pre-post questionnaires were used to evaluate participation, satisfaction, learning and self-efficacy, and practice change. Results The program included 62 participants from across Ontario, Canada, from both the health and social service sectors. Seventy-three percent of participants attended six or more sessions, with high participant satisfaction ratings seen with the program. A statistically significant improvement in self-efficacy mean scores of 14.7% was observed pre-post. Seventy-four percent of respondents indicated that they had changed their practice because of participating in this ECHO. Conclusion Good participant retention, satisfaction, and increased confidence suggests this cross-sector virtual medical education program may have value for health and social service providers as they support the mental health of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.","PeriodicalId":45864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"33 1","pages":"23 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2022.2148789","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Health and social service providers have limited expertise with regard to assessing and treating psychiatric disorders in adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The aim of this study was to describe the development and pilot evaluation of a virtual capacity-building program (Project ECHO) focused on supporting the mental health of adults with these disabilities in Ontario, Canada. Method The pilot program consisted of 12 weekly 1.5 hour sessions hosted through a video-conferencing platform, with a combined focus of didactic teaching and case-based learning, led by an interprofessional team of subject matter experts. The program evaluation was informed by Moore’s evaluation framework for continuing medical education. Ongoing attendance tracking, weekly surveys, and pre-post questionnaires were used to evaluate participation, satisfaction, learning and self-efficacy, and practice change. Results The program included 62 participants from across Ontario, Canada, from both the health and social service sectors. Seventy-three percent of participants attended six or more sessions, with high participant satisfaction ratings seen with the program. A statistically significant improvement in self-efficacy mean scores of 14.7% was observed pre-post. Seventy-four percent of respondents indicated that they had changed their practice because of participating in this ECHO. Conclusion Good participant retention, satisfaction, and increased confidence suggests this cross-sector virtual medical education program may have value for health and social service providers as they support the mental health of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人智力和发育障碍回声心理健康的发展和试点评价
健康和社会服务提供者在评估和治疗智力和发育障碍成人精神疾病方面的专业知识有限。本研究的目的是描述一个虚拟能力建设方案(ECHO项目)的发展和试点评估,该方案的重点是支持加拿大安大略省有这些残疾的成年人的心理健康。该试点项目由一个跨专业的学科专家团队领导,通过视频会议平台主持,每周进行12次1.5小时的课程,重点是教学和案例学习。项目评估采用Moore的继续医学教育评估框架。持续的出勤跟踪,每周的调查和前后的调查问卷用于评估参与,满意度,学习和自我效能,以及实践的改变。结果:该项目包括来自加拿大安大略省各地的62名参与者,他们来自卫生和社会服务部门。73%的参与者参加了6次或更多的会议,参与者对该计划的满意度很高。自我效能感在治疗前后的平均得分提高了14.7%。74%的受访者表示,由于参加了这项ECHO,他们已经改变了自己的做法。结论:良好的参与者留存率、满意度和信心的增加表明,这种跨部门的虚拟医学教育项目可能对健康和社会服务提供者有价值,因为他们支持智力和发育障碍成人的心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Suicidality and Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review Mental Functions in People with Mild Intellectual Disability to Borderline Intellectual Functioning Personal Growth Among Parents of Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities and Psychopathology: The Role of Social Support and Attitudes Toward Service Use Clinical Opinion: Differences in Addressing Needs of Persons with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities for In-Person and Digital Psychotherapy Impact of Crisis Care on Psychiatric Admission in Adults with Intellectual Disability and Mental Illness And/Or Challenging Behavior: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1