A review of Nakagawa(2020), Information Structure in Spoken Japanese: Particles, Word Order, and Intonation

Yoonji Choi
{"title":"A review of Nakagawa(2020), Information Structure in Spoken Japanese: Particles, Word Order, and Intonation","authors":"Yoonji Choi","doi":"10.51157/kmor.2022.24.2.370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a review of Nakagawa(2020), Information Structure in Spoken Japanese: Particles, Word Order, and Intonation, this article summarizes its main contents, points out its problems, and examines topics comparable to the Korean information structure. Nakagawa(2020) is mainly based on the analysis of the Corpus of Spontaneous Japanese, and uses the frame of referential information status which is a modified version of Prince(1981)’s assumed familiarity taxonomy and the category of topic and focus defined according to ‘controversiality’. The topic particles such as toiuno-wa, wa, COP-kedo/ga, and ∅ are shown to be distributed in different scopes of given-new taxonomy, and the focus particles such as ga, o, and ∅ are claimed to be correlated with the grammatical and semantic properties of NP and the type of focus. Topic and focus are claimed to appear clause-initially and right before the predicate, respectively, and to tend to be uttered in phrasal IUs (intonational units) and clausal IUs, respectively. We point out several problems of Nakagawa(2020) that it needs full discussion of discriminating topic and focus markers, more detailed description of the relationship between IUs and informational status, and reconsidering of so-called information-structure continuity principle. For comparative study of information structure of Korean and Japanese, we propose to investigate the relationship between case particles and focus, and to compare a Japanese topic marker toiuno-wa and a Korean topic marker (i)ran.","PeriodicalId":74228,"journal":{"name":"Morphology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Morphology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51157/kmor.2022.24.2.370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a review of Nakagawa(2020), Information Structure in Spoken Japanese: Particles, Word Order, and Intonation, this article summarizes its main contents, points out its problems, and examines topics comparable to the Korean information structure. Nakagawa(2020) is mainly based on the analysis of the Corpus of Spontaneous Japanese, and uses the frame of referential information status which is a modified version of Prince(1981)’s assumed familiarity taxonomy and the category of topic and focus defined according to ‘controversiality’. The topic particles such as toiuno-wa, wa, COP-kedo/ga, and ∅ are shown to be distributed in different scopes of given-new taxonomy, and the focus particles such as ga, o, and ∅ are claimed to be correlated with the grammatical and semantic properties of NP and the type of focus. Topic and focus are claimed to appear clause-initially and right before the predicate, respectively, and to tend to be uttered in phrasal IUs (intonational units) and clausal IUs, respectively. We point out several problems of Nakagawa(2020) that it needs full discussion of discriminating topic and focus markers, more detailed description of the relationship between IUs and informational status, and reconsidering of so-called information-structure continuity principle. For comparative study of information structure of Korean and Japanese, we propose to investigate the relationship between case particles and focus, and to compare a Japanese topic marker toiuno-wa and a Korean topic marker (i)ran.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中川(2020):《日语口语中的信息结构:小品、词序和语调》
作为对Nakagawa(2020)的《日语口语中的信息结构:小品、词序和语调》的回顾,本文总结了其主要内容,指出了其存在的问题,并探讨了与韩语信息结构相似的话题。Nakagawa(2020)主要基于对自发日语语料库的分析,并使用参照信息状态框架,该框架是Prince(1981)假设熟悉度分类法的改进版本,并根据“争议性”定义话题和焦点类别。toiuno-wa、wa、COP-kedo/ga、∅等主题粒子分布在给定新分类的不同范围内,ga、o、∅等焦点粒子被认为与NP的语法语义性质和焦点类型相关。主题和焦点分别以从句形式出现,在谓语之前出现,并分别以短语单位(语调单位)和小句单位出现。我们指出了Nakagawa(2020)的几个问题,需要充分讨论区分话题和焦点标记,更详细地描述IUs与信息状态之间的关系,重新考虑所谓的信息结构连续性原则。为了对韩语和日语的信息结构进行比较研究,我们建议研究格小品和焦点之间的关系,并比较日语话题标记语toiuno-wa和韩语话题标记语(i)ran。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anatomical observation of the sinoatrial node artery of the cardiac conduction system in adult humans Integrative views of representations and processes in morphology: an introduction A discriminative information-theoretical analysis of the regularity gradient in inflectional morphology Regeneration of vital organs of mammals in fetal period Somatotype and portal hypertension: the role of the constitution in clinical practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1