{"title":"The Effects of Physical Forces on Cartilage Tissue Engineering","authors":"C. Heath","doi":"10.1080/02648725.2000.10648004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite long-held beliefs to the contrary, articularcartilage, which provides articulating joints with a nearly frictionless, weight-distributing surface for transferring forces between bones, does have a limited ability for self..repair (Cheung et al., 1978; Mankin, 1982; Grande et at., 1989). With age, repeated overuse, or injury, however, natural mechanislns may be inadequate for repairing the damage. Mechanical breakdown of the articulating surfaces within freely moving (diarthrodial or synovial) joints results in osteoarthritis, which afflicts over 30 million people in the U.S. alone (Mow et al., 1992). Current treatment of severely damaged cartilage usually involves total replacement of affected joints with artificial prostheses or transplantation of donor tissue, each of which has its limitations. Artificial prostheses, because of their limited lifetime and need for replacement, are not the best option for younger patients. Donor tissue, on the other hand, is not always available, especially in the size and shape needed. Promising new therapies already in clinical use or still under study include the development of replacement cartilage ill vivo, either by injecting cells into the tissue (Brittberg et ai., 1994) or by implanting a matrix that was seeded with cells ill vitro (Frenkel et aI., 1997). Another alternative is implantation of tissue constructs that have already been partially developed in vitro. A nunlber of studies have shown that cartilage-like tissue can be regenerated in vitro, and that development of the tissue matrix is enhanced in culture systenlS simulating aspects of the native environment, ie that provide a compatible three-dimensional support. structure, good mass trdnsfer, and a physical (and/or chemical) stimulus. While progress has been made in growing tissue that has bioclzel1zical and even histological similarity, in most cases the","PeriodicalId":8931,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews","volume":"67 1","pages":"533 - 552"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2000.10648004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Abstract
Despite long-held beliefs to the contrary, articularcartilage, which provides articulating joints with a nearly frictionless, weight-distributing surface for transferring forces between bones, does have a limited ability for self..repair (Cheung et al., 1978; Mankin, 1982; Grande et at., 1989). With age, repeated overuse, or injury, however, natural mechanislns may be inadequate for repairing the damage. Mechanical breakdown of the articulating surfaces within freely moving (diarthrodial or synovial) joints results in osteoarthritis, which afflicts over 30 million people in the U.S. alone (Mow et al., 1992). Current treatment of severely damaged cartilage usually involves total replacement of affected joints with artificial prostheses or transplantation of donor tissue, each of which has its limitations. Artificial prostheses, because of their limited lifetime and need for replacement, are not the best option for younger patients. Donor tissue, on the other hand, is not always available, especially in the size and shape needed. Promising new therapies already in clinical use or still under study include the development of replacement cartilage ill vivo, either by injecting cells into the tissue (Brittberg et ai., 1994) or by implanting a matrix that was seeded with cells ill vitro (Frenkel et aI., 1997). Another alternative is implantation of tissue constructs that have already been partially developed in vitro. A nunlber of studies have shown that cartilage-like tissue can be regenerated in vitro, and that development of the tissue matrix is enhanced in culture systenlS simulating aspects of the native environment, ie that provide a compatible three-dimensional support. structure, good mass trdnsfer, and a physical (and/or chemical) stimulus. While progress has been made in growing tissue that has bioclzel1zical and even histological similarity, in most cases the
尽管长期以来人们持有相反的观点,关节软骨为关节提供了几乎无摩擦的重量分布表面,用于在骨骼之间传递力,但它确实具有有限的自我修复能力(Cheung等人,1978;Mankin, 1982;格兰德。, 1989)。然而,随着年龄的增长,反复过度使用或受伤,自然机制可能不足以修复损伤。在自由活动的关节(腹泻关节或滑膜关节)内关节表面的机械破坏导致骨关节炎,仅在美国就有超过3000万人患有骨关节炎(Mow et al., 1992)。目前对严重受损软骨的治疗通常包括用人工假体或供体组织移植完全替代受影响的关节,每种方法都有其局限性。由于人工假体的使用寿命有限,需要更换,所以对年轻患者来说不是最好的选择。另一方面,供体组织并不总是可用的,尤其是在所需的大小和形状上。有希望的新疗法已经在临床使用或仍在研究中,包括通过向组织中注射细胞来发展体内软骨替代物(Brittberg等)。(frankel et aI.), 1994)或通过植入一种基质,该基质用离体细胞播种(Frenkel et aI.)。, 1997)。另一种选择是植入已经在体外部分发育的组织结构。许多研究表明,软骨样组织可以在体外再生,并且在模拟自然环境的培养系统中,组织基质的发育得到加强,即提供兼容的三维支持。结构,良好的传质,和物理(和/或化学)刺激。虽然在培养具有生物类型学甚至组织学相似性的组织方面已经取得了进展,但在大多数情况下,生物类型学和生物学的相似性是不可避免的