Pad Weight, Pad Number and Incontinence-Related Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Radical Prostatectomy

C. Pham, Manish I. Patel, S. Mungovan
{"title":"Pad Weight, Pad Number and Incontinence-Related Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Radical Prostatectomy","authors":"C. Pham, Manish I. Patel, S. Mungovan","doi":"10.48083/10.48083/tiwq1657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the correlation between 3- and 6-week postoperative 24-hour pad weight, daily pad number, and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires for Male Lower Urinary Tract (ICIQ-MLUTS), ICIQ-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) and UCLA Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI) in patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods: This prospective study included patients undergoing RARP between February and November 2019. Patients completed a 24-hour pad test, assessing pad weight and number, and 3 validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); the ICIQ-MLUTS, ICIQ-SF and UCLA-PCI, preoperatively and at 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Results: A total of 47 patients were included in the study. There was a strong correlation between 24-hour pad weight and the ICIQ-SF at 3 weeks (r = 0.71, P < 0.001) and 6 weeks (r = 0.68, P < 0.001). There was a strong correlation between 24-hour pad weight and ICIQ-MLUTS incontinence (r = 0.80, P < 0.01) and incontinence QoL burden (r = 0.79, P < 0.01) at 6 weeks. There was a moderate correlation between the 24-hour pad weight and UCLA-PCI urinary function (r = 0.58, P < 0.001) and urinary QoL burden (r = 0.66, P < 0.001) at 6 weeks. The correlation between pad number and 24-hour pad weight was weak at 6 weeks (r = 0.34, P < 0.001). Conclusion: PROMs may be used as a substitute for the 24-hour pad weight test for post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) assessments in the early post-RARP period. The ICIQ-SF and UCLA-PCI urinary function and QoL scores correlate with 24-hour pad weight. However, the ICIQ-MLUTS incontinence and QoL scores provide the strongest correlation with PPI.","PeriodicalId":21961,"journal":{"name":"Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48083/10.48083/tiwq1657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the correlation between 3- and 6-week postoperative 24-hour pad weight, daily pad number, and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires for Male Lower Urinary Tract (ICIQ-MLUTS), ICIQ-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) and UCLA Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI) in patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods: This prospective study included patients undergoing RARP between February and November 2019. Patients completed a 24-hour pad test, assessing pad weight and number, and 3 validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); the ICIQ-MLUTS, ICIQ-SF and UCLA-PCI, preoperatively and at 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Results: A total of 47 patients were included in the study. There was a strong correlation between 24-hour pad weight and the ICIQ-SF at 3 weeks (r = 0.71, P < 0.001) and 6 weeks (r = 0.68, P < 0.001). There was a strong correlation between 24-hour pad weight and ICIQ-MLUTS incontinence (r = 0.80, P < 0.01) and incontinence QoL burden (r = 0.79, P < 0.01) at 6 weeks. There was a moderate correlation between the 24-hour pad weight and UCLA-PCI urinary function (r = 0.58, P < 0.001) and urinary QoL burden (r = 0.66, P < 0.001) at 6 weeks. The correlation between pad number and 24-hour pad weight was weak at 6 weeks (r = 0.34, P < 0.001). Conclusion: PROMs may be used as a substitute for the 24-hour pad weight test for post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) assessments in the early post-RARP period. The ICIQ-SF and UCLA-PCI urinary function and QoL scores correlate with 24-hour pad weight. However, the ICIQ-MLUTS incontinence and QoL scores provide the strongest correlation with PPI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺根治性切除术后尿垫重量、尿垫数量和尿失禁相关患者报告的结果测量
目的:评估机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)患者术后3周和6周24小时尿垫重量、每日尿垫数与男性下尿路失禁国际咨询问卷(ICIQ-MLUTS)、ICIQ-SF和UCLA前列腺癌指数(UCLA- pci)的相关性。方法:这项前瞻性研究纳入了2019年2月至11月期间接受RARP治疗的患者。患者完成了24小时尿垫试验,评估尿垫的重量和数量,以及3个经过验证的患者报告的结果测量(PROMs);ICIQ-MLUTS, ICIQ-SF和UCLA-PCI,术前、术后3周和6周。结果:共纳入47例患者。24小时尿垫重量与3周(r = 0.71, P < 0.001)和6周(r = 0.68, P < 0.001) ICIQ-SF有很强的相关性。24小时尿垫重量与6周时ICIQ-MLUTS尿失禁(r = 0.80, P < 0.01)和尿失禁生活质量负担(r = 0.79, P < 0.01)有很强的相关性。6周时24小时尿垫重量与UCLA-PCI尿功能(r = 0.58, P < 0.001)和尿生活质量负担(r = 0.66, P < 0.001)有中度相关性。6周时尿垫数与24小时尿垫重量相关性较弱(r = 0.34, P < 0.001)。结论:PROMs可替代24小时尿垫重量试验用于前列腺切除术后尿失禁(PPI)的早期评估。ICIQ-SF和UCLA-PCI尿功能和生活质量评分与24小时尿垫重量相关。然而,ICIQ-MLUTS尿失禁和生活质量评分与PPI的相关性最强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Patient Education: A Bladder Cancer Consultation with ChatGPT Perioperative Blood Transfusion Is Associated with Worse Survival in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer RE: Prevalence of MRI Lesions in Men Responding to a GP-Led Invitation for a Prostate Health Check: A Prospective Cohort Study Quality and Readability of Google Search Information on HoLEP for Benign Prostate Hyperplasia A Quality and Completeness Assessment of Testicular Cancer Health Information on TikTok
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1