Eco-efficiency of CdTe photovoltaics with tracking systems

P. Sinha, M. Schneider, Scott N. Dailey, Calvin Jepson, M. de Wild-Scholten
{"title":"Eco-efficiency of CdTe photovoltaics with tracking systems","authors":"P. Sinha, M. Schneider, Scott N. Dailey, Calvin Jepson, M. de Wild-Scholten","doi":"10.1109/PVSC.2013.6745173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Eco-efficiency is a management practice based on creating more value with less environmental impact. Tracking systems provide the benefit of boosting the specific yield (kWh/kWp/yr) of photovoltaic (PV) systems, therefore requiring fewer modules per kWh produced than fixed-tilt systems. Although life cycle balance of system (BOS) environmental impacts for tracking systems are higher per kWh produced than for fixed-tilt systems, this difference is counteracted by tracking systems requiring fewer modules manufactured upstream and decommissioned downstream per kWh produced than fixed-tilt systems. The life cycle carbon footprint and energy payback time/non-renewable energy payback time (EPBT/NREPBT) of utility-scale cadmium telluride (CdTe) PV systems in the U.S. Southwest range from 16-17 g CO2e/kWh and 0.6-0.7 yr, respectively, with impacts for tracking systems slightly (1-3%) lower than for fixed-tilt systems. Similarly, although tracking systems have slightly higher construction and operations and maintenance (O&M) costs per watt than fixed-tilt systems, these costs are counteracted by the improved specific yield of tracking systems, resulting in lower cost per kWh in the U.S. Southwest case study considered in this evaluation (global horizontal irradiation of 1952-2094 kWh/m2/yr). Because tracking systems have the potential to create more value (kWh/$) with less life cycle environmental impact, they provide an eco-efficient strategy for improving the sustainability of PV systems. A key factor influencing the eco-efficiency of tracking systems is the tracking energy gain relative to fixed-tilt systems, which generally ranges from 10-24% over tropical and subtropical latitudes and is determined by project design, site latitude, and the proportion of diffuse horizontal insolation to global horizontal insolation at the site.","PeriodicalId":6350,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 39th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC)","volume":"39 1","pages":"3374-3378"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE 39th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2013.6745173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Eco-efficiency is a management practice based on creating more value with less environmental impact. Tracking systems provide the benefit of boosting the specific yield (kWh/kWp/yr) of photovoltaic (PV) systems, therefore requiring fewer modules per kWh produced than fixed-tilt systems. Although life cycle balance of system (BOS) environmental impacts for tracking systems are higher per kWh produced than for fixed-tilt systems, this difference is counteracted by tracking systems requiring fewer modules manufactured upstream and decommissioned downstream per kWh produced than fixed-tilt systems. The life cycle carbon footprint and energy payback time/non-renewable energy payback time (EPBT/NREPBT) of utility-scale cadmium telluride (CdTe) PV systems in the U.S. Southwest range from 16-17 g CO2e/kWh and 0.6-0.7 yr, respectively, with impacts for tracking systems slightly (1-3%) lower than for fixed-tilt systems. Similarly, although tracking systems have slightly higher construction and operations and maintenance (O&M) costs per watt than fixed-tilt systems, these costs are counteracted by the improved specific yield of tracking systems, resulting in lower cost per kWh in the U.S. Southwest case study considered in this evaluation (global horizontal irradiation of 1952-2094 kWh/m2/yr). Because tracking systems have the potential to create more value (kWh/$) with less life cycle environmental impact, they provide an eco-efficient strategy for improving the sustainability of PV systems. A key factor influencing the eco-efficiency of tracking systems is the tracking energy gain relative to fixed-tilt systems, which generally ranges from 10-24% over tropical and subtropical latitudes and is determined by project design, site latitude, and the proportion of diffuse horizontal insolation to global horizontal insolation at the site.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带跟踪系统的碲化镉光伏电池的生态效率
生态效率是一种基于以更少的环境影响创造更多价值的管理实践。跟踪系统提供了提高光伏(PV)系统的特定产量(千瓦时/千瓦时/年)的好处,因此每千瓦时生产所需的模块比固定倾斜系统少。虽然跟踪系统的生命周期平衡(BOS)环境影响比固定倾斜系统高,但与固定倾斜系统相比,跟踪系统每生产千瓦时需要更少的上游制造和下游退役模块,从而抵消了这种差异。在美国西南部,公用事业规模的碲化镉(CdTe)光伏系统的生命周期碳足迹和能源回收期/不可再生能源回收期(EPBT/NREPBT)分别为16-17克二氧化碳当量/千瓦时和0.6-0.7年,跟踪系统的影响略低于固定倾斜系统(1-3%)。同样,尽管跟踪系统的每瓦建设、运营和维护(O&M)成本略高于固定倾斜系统,但这些成本被跟踪系统提高的比产率所抵消,导致本评估中考虑的美国西南部案例研究(全球水平辐射为1952-2094千瓦时/平方米/年)每千瓦时成本较低。由于跟踪系统有可能创造更多的价值(千瓦时/美元),同时减少生命周期对环境的影响,因此它们为提高光伏系统的可持续性提供了一种生态高效的策略。影响跟踪系统生态效率的一个关键因素是相对于固定倾斜系统的跟踪能量增益,在热带和亚热带纬度上,跟踪能量增益一般在10-24%之间,由项目设计、场地纬度和场地漫射水平日照占总水平日照的比例决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conversion efficiencies of six grid-tied inverters at the Tucson electric power solar test yard Photovoltaics in power systems: Legends, challenges and solutions UV aging performance of Blue Light encapsulant films Comparison of different DC Arc spectra — Derivation of proposals for the development of an international arc fault detector standard Reliability model development for photovoltaic connector lifetime prediction capabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1