Drag folds in sedimentary rocks hosting kimberlites, West Yakutia

P. Ignatov, N. Zaripov, Konstantin Novikov, A. Tolstov
{"title":"Drag folds in sedimentary rocks hosting kimberlites, West Yakutia","authors":"P. Ignatov, N. Zaripov, Konstantin Novikov, A. Tolstov","doi":"10.47765/0869-5997-2021-10020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drag folds were revealed in Lower Paleozoic sedimentary strata of Mirny, Nakyn and Syuldyukar diamondiferous fields, West Yakutia. They consist of minor anticlinal forms (3-5 to 15-20 cm thick) and cut marl, clayey limestone and dolomite bands located between monolith seams of carbonate rocks. Some folds as monocline, flexures and S- or Z-shaped folds reflect the degree of shearrelated interlayer offset. Drag folds are among shear zone occurrences including microfaults, slickensides with slip groove horizontal planes, and schistosity zones. Drag folds reflect local extension points while schistosity zones indicate compression points. For Syuldyukar field, detailed mapping results for drag folds and schistosity zones are provided at 3 scales: across 20 × 20 m observation grid within a local 2 km2 site; across 200 × 200 m grid within 20 km2 area; across 500 × 500 m grid within ~100 km2 territory. For all scales, drag fold halos are restricted to schistosity zones. Within a local site adjacent to kimberlites, drag folds mark ore-hosting fault controlling long axes of kimberlite areal projections. Within large areas, drag fold halos are 1,2-2 km, which compares with kimberlite group areal parameters. Drag fold halos reflect shear junctions, with some of them hosting kimberlites. Local occurrences of drag folds mark a major shear hosting a kimberlite body. Drag fold analysis combined with other evidence should be used as an indirect prospecting indicator of concealed shears and local extension areas controlling kimberlites.","PeriodicalId":19636,"journal":{"name":"Ores and metals","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ores and metals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47765/0869-5997-2021-10020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drag folds were revealed in Lower Paleozoic sedimentary strata of Mirny, Nakyn and Syuldyukar diamondiferous fields, West Yakutia. They consist of minor anticlinal forms (3-5 to 15-20 cm thick) and cut marl, clayey limestone and dolomite bands located between monolith seams of carbonate rocks. Some folds as monocline, flexures and S- or Z-shaped folds reflect the degree of shearrelated interlayer offset. Drag folds are among shear zone occurrences including microfaults, slickensides with slip groove horizontal planes, and schistosity zones. Drag folds reflect local extension points while schistosity zones indicate compression points. For Syuldyukar field, detailed mapping results for drag folds and schistosity zones are provided at 3 scales: across 20 × 20 m observation grid within a local 2 km2 site; across 200 × 200 m grid within 20 km2 area; across 500 × 500 m grid within ~100 km2 territory. For all scales, drag fold halos are restricted to schistosity zones. Within a local site adjacent to kimberlites, drag folds mark ore-hosting fault controlling long axes of kimberlite areal projections. Within large areas, drag fold halos are 1,2-2 km, which compares with kimberlite group areal parameters. Drag fold halos reflect shear junctions, with some of them hosting kimberlites. Local occurrences of drag folds mark a major shear hosting a kimberlite body. Drag fold analysis combined with other evidence should be used as an indirect prospecting indicator of concealed shears and local extension areas controlling kimberlites.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西雅库特,含金伯利岩的沉积岩中的拖曳褶皱
在西雅库特地区的Mirny、Nakyn和Syuldyukar钻石矿区下古生界沉积地层中发现了拖曳褶皱。它们由小背斜形式(3-5 ~ 15-20 cm厚)和位于碳酸盐岩整体缝间的泥灰岩、粘土灰岩和白云岩带组成。单斜褶皱、弯曲褶皱和S型或z型褶皱反映了与剪切相关的层间偏移程度。剪切带产状包括微断层、滑槽水平面滑面和片岩带。拖拽褶皱反映了局部的延伸点,而片理带则反映了局部的压缩点。对于Syuldyukar油田,在3个尺度上提供了拖曳褶皱和片理带的详细制图结果:在当地2平方公里的场地内,跨越20 × 20米的观测网格;在20平方公里范围内跨越200 × 200米网格;在约100平方公里的领土内跨越500 × 500米的网格。对于所有尺度,拖拽褶皱晕仅限于片岩带。在邻近金伯利岩的局部地点内,拖拽褶皱标志着控制金伯利岩区域投影长轴的含矿断层。在大范围内,与金伯利岩群的面积参数相比,拖拽褶皱晕为1.2 ~ 2 km。拖拉褶皱晕反映剪切结,其中一些含有金伯利岩。局部出现的拖拽褶皱标志着一个承载金伯利岩体的大剪切。牵引褶皱分析结合其他证据可作为隐伏剪切带和控制金伯利岩的局部伸展区的间接找矿标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mineralogy of garnets from the Jubileinaya kimberlite pipe and Ottorzhenets kimberlite body Rare earth mineralization in ores of the Gurvunur apatite-magnetite deposit (Ozerny ore cluster, Western Transbaikalia) Identification of new objects promising for porphyry molybdenum-copper mineralization when creating the State geological map 1000/3: Sheets O-55, O-56 (Northern Priokhotye, Magadan region) as an example Microimpurities in pyrite of gold ore occurrences of the Manitanyrd ridge (the Polar Urals) Diagnostic features of rutile and cassiterite from heavy mineral concentrate samples, according to the IR microscopy data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1