The Effect of Treatment Facility, Race, and Chemoradiation on Survival for Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database

J. Gootee, C. Willman, S. Aurit, P. Silberstein
{"title":"The Effect of Treatment Facility, Race, and Chemoradiation on Survival for Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database","authors":"J. Gootee, C. Willman, S. Aurit, P. Silberstein","doi":"10.31487/j.cor.2021.08.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Signet ring cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SRCCE) is an aggressive tumor that represents \napproximately 3.5-5.0% of all esophageal cancers. Prior studies have shown a strong correlation between \ntreating facility and survival for different cancers, but this has not been studied in SRCCE. The goal of this \nstudy is to assess differences in survival based on the type of treatment facility.\nMethods: There were 2,021 patients with SRCCE identified using the histology 8490 and topography codes \nC15.0-C15.9 in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Descriptive analysis, Kaplan-Meier curves, and a \nmultivariable Cox hazard regression analysis were all utilized to determine the significance of treatment \nfacility type and other variables.\nResults: The cohort mostly received treatment at academic centers (47.7%). As age increased, mortality \nalso increased (HR=1.01; 95% CI:1.01-1.02, p<0.001). Africans Americans (HR=1.44; 95% CI:1.02-2.02, \np=0.036) had an increased risk of mortality when compared to Non-Hispanic Caucasians. Patients at \nacademic facilities demonstrated a decreased risk of mortality when compared to community programmes \n(HR=0.73; 95% CI:0.64-0.84, p<0.001) and integrated cancer programmes (HR=0.69; 95% CI:0.58-0.83, \np=0.008). Neoadjuvant chemoradiation resulted decreased mortality when compared to adjuvant \nchemoradiation (HR=1.41; 95% CI:1.21-1.63, p<0.001) and no chemoradiation (HR=1.84; 95% CI:1.58-\n2.14, p<0.001). \nConclusion: For patients diagnosed with SRCCE, receiving treatment at academic centers resulted in better \nsurvival probabilities compared to nonacademic facilities. Older patients, African Americans, increasing \ntumor stage, no and adjuvant chemoradiation, and comorbidities with Charlson-Deyo scores of 1 and 2+ \nwere all associated with an increased risk of mortality from SRCCE.","PeriodicalId":10487,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology and Research","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.cor.2021.08.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Signet ring cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SRCCE) is an aggressive tumor that represents approximately 3.5-5.0% of all esophageal cancers. Prior studies have shown a strong correlation between treating facility and survival for different cancers, but this has not been studied in SRCCE. The goal of this study is to assess differences in survival based on the type of treatment facility. Methods: There were 2,021 patients with SRCCE identified using the histology 8490 and topography codes C15.0-C15.9 in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Descriptive analysis, Kaplan-Meier curves, and a multivariable Cox hazard regression analysis were all utilized to determine the significance of treatment facility type and other variables. Results: The cohort mostly received treatment at academic centers (47.7%). As age increased, mortality also increased (HR=1.01; 95% CI:1.01-1.02, p<0.001). Africans Americans (HR=1.44; 95% CI:1.02-2.02, p=0.036) had an increased risk of mortality when compared to Non-Hispanic Caucasians. Patients at academic facilities demonstrated a decreased risk of mortality when compared to community programmes (HR=0.73; 95% CI:0.64-0.84, p<0.001) and integrated cancer programmes (HR=0.69; 95% CI:0.58-0.83, p=0.008). Neoadjuvant chemoradiation resulted decreased mortality when compared to adjuvant chemoradiation (HR=1.41; 95% CI:1.21-1.63, p<0.001) and no chemoradiation (HR=1.84; 95% CI:1.58- 2.14, p<0.001). Conclusion: For patients diagnosed with SRCCE, receiving treatment at academic centers resulted in better survival probabilities compared to nonacademic facilities. Older patients, African Americans, increasing tumor stage, no and adjuvant chemoradiation, and comorbidities with Charlson-Deyo scores of 1 and 2+ were all associated with an increased risk of mortality from SRCCE.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗设施、种族和放化疗对食道印戒细胞癌存活的影响:国家癌症数据库的分析
背景:食管印戒细胞癌(SRCCE)是一种侵袭性肿瘤,约占所有食管癌的3.5-5.0%。先前的研究表明,治疗设施与不同癌症的生存之间存在很强的相关性,但尚未在SRCCE中进行研究。本研究的目的是评估基于治疗设施类型的生存差异。方法:使用国家癌症数据库(NCDB)的组织学8490和地形图代码C15.0-C15.9鉴定出2,021例SRCCE患者。使用描述性分析、Kaplan-Meier曲线和多变量Cox风险回归分析来确定治疗设施类型和其他变量的显著性。结果:该队列主要在学术中心接受治疗(47.7%)。随着年龄的增加,死亡率也增加(HR=1.01;95% CI:1.01-1.02, p<0.001)。非裔美国人(HR=1.44;95% CI:1.02-2.02, p=0.036)与非西班牙裔高加索人相比,死亡风险增加。与社区项目相比,在学术机构接受治疗的患者显示出较低的死亡风险(HR=0.73;95% CI:0.64-0.84, p<0.001)和综合癌症规划(HR=0.69;95% CI:0.58-0.83, p=0.008)。与辅助放化疗相比,新辅助放化疗死亡率降低(HR=1.41;95% CI:1.21-1.63, p<0.001)和无放化疗(HR=1.84;95% CI:1.58-2.14, p<0.001)。结论:对于被诊断为SRCCE的患者,与非学术机构相比,在学术中心接受治疗的生存率更高。老年患者、非裔美国人、肿瘤分期增加、无放化疗和辅助放化疗以及Charlson-Deyo评分为1和2+的合并症均与SRCCE死亡风险增加相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disseminated Thymic Carcinoma: Case Report and Discussion on Problems of Treatment What is the Obstetric Outcome with a Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ) for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia? Effects of DSPP and MMP20 Silencing on Key Signaling Pathways in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells Multifaceted Networking of The Orphan Receptor Estrogen-Related Receptor Β in Breast Cancer Progression Current CT and MRI Applications in the Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1