Religious liberty for the Chinese child: missionary debates in the 1930s

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q4 HISTORY Journal of Modern Chinese History Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI:10.1080/17535654.2019.1688975
M. Tillman
{"title":"Religious liberty for the Chinese child: missionary debates in the 1930s","authors":"M. Tillman","doi":"10.1080/17535654.2019.1688975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In 1931, liberal and conservative Christians debated the possibility of replacing Bible Study with a comparative religions course for elementary-school students, in order to comply with regulations of the Republic of China. Made possible by the ecumenical and indigenization movements within Christianity, this debate intersected with multiple issues: Western accommodation to the rise of Chinese nationalism; Christian resistance to growing secularization in the West, including elements of the social gospel; and clerical responses to child-centered pedagogies. Furthermore, liberals also promoted religious studies as a method for increasing cross-cultural understanding and world peace after World War II. While previous scholars have situated government registration of parochial schools within the rise of Chinese nationalism, this article asserts that missionaries in the 1930s viewed children’s religious education within the framework of both Chinese indigenization and global secularization.","PeriodicalId":41223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Chinese History","volume":"4 1","pages":"249 - 273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Chinese History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17535654.2019.1688975","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In 1931, liberal and conservative Christians debated the possibility of replacing Bible Study with a comparative religions course for elementary-school students, in order to comply with regulations of the Republic of China. Made possible by the ecumenical and indigenization movements within Christianity, this debate intersected with multiple issues: Western accommodation to the rise of Chinese nationalism; Christian resistance to growing secularization in the West, including elements of the social gospel; and clerical responses to child-centered pedagogies. Furthermore, liberals also promoted religious studies as a method for increasing cross-cultural understanding and world peace after World War II. While previous scholars have situated government registration of parochial schools within the rise of Chinese nationalism, this article asserts that missionaries in the 1930s viewed children’s religious education within the framework of both Chinese indigenization and global secularization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国儿童的宗教自由:20世纪30年代传教士的辩论
1931年,自由派和保守派基督徒就以比较宗教课程取代小学《圣经》课程的可能性进行了辩论,以符合中华民国的规定。由于基督教内部的普世化和本土化运动,这场辩论与多个问题交织在一起:西方对中国民族主义兴起的迁就;基督教对西方日益增长的世俗化的抵制,包括社会福音的元素;以及神职人员对以儿童为中心的教学法的反应。此外,自由主义者还在二战后将宗教研究作为增进跨文化理解和世界和平的一种方法。以前的学者将政府对教会学校的注册置于中国民族主义的兴起之中,而本文则认为,20世纪30年代的传教士在中国本土化和全球世俗化的框架内看待儿童的宗教教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
460
期刊最新文献
A world of uncertainties: litigation and order in a flood irrigation society: three villages in southern Shanxi since late imperial times Sea changes of sandbanks and reclamation of shallows in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River in the modern period Water politics: disputes about the “Yellow River-Huai River diversion proposal” in the 1930s The transformation and ecological impacts of drainage systems in modern Tianjin Development and ecological management of flood lands in Western Hebei from the perspective of environmental history (1937-1949)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1