Accuracy of Peguero-Lo Presti ECG Criteria for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Diagnosis in Elderly Thai Patients Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance as a Gold Standard

{"title":"Accuracy of Peguero-Lo Presti ECG Criteria for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Diagnosis in Elderly Thai Patients Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance as a Gold Standard","authors":"","doi":"10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.02.13773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The conventional electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria have shown low sensitivity for LVH detection in the elderly.\n\nObjective: To evaluate the diagnosis accuracy of the new ECG criteria proposed by Peguero-Lo Presti in this population using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) as a gold standard.\n\nMaterials and Methods: Patients older than 60 years that underwent CMR (1.5 T and 3 T, Philips) between 2012 and 2019 were included. Exclusion criteria were abnormal CMR findings and abnormal baseline ECG. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was calculated from short-axis slices covering the entire left ventricle. LVH was defined as LVMI of 63 g/m² or more in male patients and 48 g/m² or more in female patients. LVH by new ECG criteria was defined by the deepest S + SV4 of 2.8 or more in males and 2.3 or more in females. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy between the new criteria and the Cornell voltage criteria were compared.\n\nResults: Five hundred fifty-nine patients were included with a mean age of 71±7 years old, and with 63.69% of female, 71.56% had hypertension, and 16.46% were octogenarian. Eighty patients (14.3%) had LVH detected by CMR. The new ECG criteria showed higher sensitivity compared with the Cornell voltage criteria especially in the octogenarian with a sensitivity of 15% versus 10% in overall and 31.25% versus 18.75% in octogenarian, but the AUC did not show significant difference at AUC of 0.56 versus 0.54 (p=0.67).\n\nConclusion: Using CMR as the gold standard, the new ECG criteria showed higher sensitivity than the Cornell voltage criteria, especially in the octogenarian, without significant different accuracy.\n\nKeywords: Electrocardiography; Elderly population; Left ventricular hypertrophy; Cardiac magnetic resonance; Peguero-Lo Presti Criteria","PeriodicalId":17486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.02.13773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The conventional electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria have shown low sensitivity for LVH detection in the elderly. Objective: To evaluate the diagnosis accuracy of the new ECG criteria proposed by Peguero-Lo Presti in this population using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) as a gold standard. Materials and Methods: Patients older than 60 years that underwent CMR (1.5 T and 3 T, Philips) between 2012 and 2019 were included. Exclusion criteria were abnormal CMR findings and abnormal baseline ECG. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was calculated from short-axis slices covering the entire left ventricle. LVH was defined as LVMI of 63 g/m² or more in male patients and 48 g/m² or more in female patients. LVH by new ECG criteria was defined by the deepest S + SV4 of 2.8 or more in males and 2.3 or more in females. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy between the new criteria and the Cornell voltage criteria were compared. Results: Five hundred fifty-nine patients were included with a mean age of 71±7 years old, and with 63.69% of female, 71.56% had hypertension, and 16.46% were octogenarian. Eighty patients (14.3%) had LVH detected by CMR. The new ECG criteria showed higher sensitivity compared with the Cornell voltage criteria especially in the octogenarian with a sensitivity of 15% versus 10% in overall and 31.25% versus 18.75% in octogenarian, but the AUC did not show significant difference at AUC of 0.56 versus 0.54 (p=0.67). Conclusion: Using CMR as the gold standard, the new ECG criteria showed higher sensitivity than the Cornell voltage criteria, especially in the octogenarian, without significant different accuracy. Keywords: Electrocardiography; Elderly population; Left ventricular hypertrophy; Cardiac magnetic resonance; Peguero-Lo Presti Criteria
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Peguero-Lo Presti心电图标准以心血管磁共振为金标准诊断老年泰国患者左心室肥厚的准确性
背景:传统的心电图(ECG)标准对老年人LVH的检测灵敏度较低。目的:评价Peguero-Lo Presti提出的以心血管磁共振(CMR)为金标准的新心电图标准对该人群的诊断准确性。材料和方法:纳入2012年至2019年期间接受CMR (1.5 T和3 T,飞利浦)的60岁以上患者。排除标准为CMR异常和基线心电图异常。左心室质量指数(LVMI)由覆盖整个左心室的短轴切片计算。LVH定义为男性患者LVMI≥63 g/m²,女性患者LVMI≥48 g/m²。根据新的ECG标准,LVH的定义是男性最深S + SV4为2.8或更高,女性为2.3或更高。比较了新标准和Cornell电压标准的敏感性、特异性和准确性。结果:共纳入559例患者,平均年龄71±7岁,女性占63.69%,高血压占71.56%,高龄患者占16.46%。CMR检出LVH 80例(14.3%)。与康奈尔电压标准相比,新的心电图标准显示出更高的灵敏度,特别是在80岁老人中,灵敏度为15%对10%,31.25%对18.75%,但AUC没有显着差异,AUC为0.56对0.54 (p=0.67)。结论:以CMR为金标准的新心电图判据灵敏度高于Cornell电压判据,尤其是在80多岁人群中,准确率无显著差异。关键词:心电描记法;老年人口;左心室肥厚;心脏磁共振;Peguero-Lo Presti标准
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis between Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) and Conventional Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (HNP) Behavioral Risk Score for Predicting Well-Controlled HbA1c Level in Diabetes Type 2 Patients The Choice of Anesthesia after First Failed Spinal Block and Its Impact on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Cesarean Delivery: A Cross-Sectional Study Efficacy of Levetiracetam versus Phenytoin in Neonatal Seizure in Rural Area of Thailand Spontaneous Sternal Fracture in Multiple Myeloma: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1