The Challenges of Putting Community First: Reflections on a University Center’s Process

C. Wegemer, Tafadzwa Tivaringe, R. Hildreth, Jennifer Pacheco, M. Sifuentes
{"title":"The Challenges of Putting Community First: Reflections on a University Center’s Process","authors":"C. Wegemer, Tafadzwa Tivaringe, R. Hildreth, Jennifer Pacheco, M. Sifuentes","doi":"10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0026.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to share tensions experienced by the Center for Community- Based Learning and Engagement (CU Engage) at the University of Colorado Boulder during its attempts to facilitate social justice– oriented community change. These tensions speak to larger questions about the goals of community-campus engagement (CCE) programs, especially regarding the nature of power, interests, and definitions of community and impact. This paper documents CU Engage’s learning process through three illustrative stages: an exploratory community- based project, a qualitative self- study, and a collaboratively generated conceptual framework for public impact. Through this process, CU Engage has begun to develop an approach that applies, extends, and complicates existing frameworks of collective impact and community first. Ten sions that arose highlight three imperatives: (1) integration of participatory processes into CCE programs to supplement organizational partnerships with direct community input, (2) attention to power and structural constraints in community- centered work, and (3) creation of conceptual tools that guide collaborative work.","PeriodicalId":93128,"journal":{"name":"Michigan journal of community service learning","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan journal of community service learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0026.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to share tensions experienced by the Center for Community- Based Learning and Engagement (CU Engage) at the University of Colorado Boulder during its attempts to facilitate social justice– oriented community change. These tensions speak to larger questions about the goals of community-campus engagement (CCE) programs, especially regarding the nature of power, interests, and definitions of community and impact. This paper documents CU Engage’s learning process through three illustrative stages: an exploratory community- based project, a qualitative self- study, and a collaboratively generated conceptual framework for public impact. Through this process, CU Engage has begun to develop an approach that applies, extends, and complicates existing frameworks of collective impact and community first. Ten sions that arose highlight three imperatives: (1) integration of participatory processes into CCE programs to supplement organizational partnerships with direct community input, (2) attention to power and structural constraints in community- centered work, and (3) creation of conceptual tools that guide collaborative work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
把社区放在首位的挑战:对大学中心进程的思考
本文的目的是分享科罗拉多大学博尔德分校社区学习与参与中心(CU Engage)在试图促进以社会正义为导向的社区变革时所经历的紧张局势。这些紧张关系反映了社区-校园参与(CCE)项目目标的更大问题,特别是关于权力、利益的本质,以及社区和影响的定义。本文通过三个说明性阶段记录了CU Engage的学习过程:一个探索性的基于社区的项目,一个定性的自我学习,以及一个合作产生的公共影响概念框架。通过这个过程,CU Engage已经开始开发一种方法,该方法首先应用、扩展并使现有的集体影响和社区框架复杂化。出现的10个观点强调了三个必要性:(1)将参与性过程整合到CCE项目中,以社区直接投入补充组织伙伴关系;(2)关注以社区为中心的工作中的权力和结构约束;(3)创造指导协作工作的概念工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Title Pending 5477 Daniels, R., Shreve, G., & Spector, P. (2021). What Universities Owe Democracy. John Hopkins University Press. List of Reviewers Reviewers - Volume 27.2 Validation of S-LOMS and Comparison Between Hong Kong and Singapore of Student Developmental Outcomes After Service-Learning Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1