Influence of the Curvature Correction on Turbulence Models for the Prediction of the Aerodynamic Coefficients of the S809 Airfoil

Mohammed Nebbache, A. Youcefi
{"title":"Influence of the Curvature Correction on Turbulence Models for the Prediction of the Aerodynamic Coefficients of the S809 Airfoil","authors":"Mohammed Nebbache, A. Youcefi","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.43.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the appropriate procedure, Computational Fluid Dynamics allows predicting many things in several fields, and especially in the field of renewable energies, which has become a promising research axis. The present study aims at highlighting the influence of the curvature correction on turbulence models for the prediction of the aerodynamic coefficients of the S809 airfoil using the Computational Fluid Dynamics code ANSYS Fluent 17.2. Three turbulence models are used: Spalart-Allmaras, Shear Stress Transport k-ω and Transition SST. Experimental results of the 1.8 m × 1.25 m low-turbulence wind tunnel at the Delft University of Technology are used in this work for comparison with the numerical results for a Reynolds number of 106. The results show that the use of the curvature correction improves the prediction of the aerodynamic coefficients for all the turbulence models used. A comparison of the three models is also made using curvature correction since it gave better results. The Transition SST model is the one that gives the best results for the lift coefficient, followed by the Shear Stress Transport kω model, and finally the Spalart-Allmaras model. For the drag coefficient, Transition SST model is the best, followed by the Spalart-Allmaras model, and finally the Shear Stress Transport kω model.","PeriodicalId":7184,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Engineering Forum","volume":"79 1","pages":"45 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Engineering Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.43.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using the appropriate procedure, Computational Fluid Dynamics allows predicting many things in several fields, and especially in the field of renewable energies, which has become a promising research axis. The present study aims at highlighting the influence of the curvature correction on turbulence models for the prediction of the aerodynamic coefficients of the S809 airfoil using the Computational Fluid Dynamics code ANSYS Fluent 17.2. Three turbulence models are used: Spalart-Allmaras, Shear Stress Transport k-ω and Transition SST. Experimental results of the 1.8 m × 1.25 m low-turbulence wind tunnel at the Delft University of Technology are used in this work for comparison with the numerical results for a Reynolds number of 106. The results show that the use of the curvature correction improves the prediction of the aerodynamic coefficients for all the turbulence models used. A comparison of the three models is also made using curvature correction since it gave better results. The Transition SST model is the one that gives the best results for the lift coefficient, followed by the Shear Stress Transport kω model, and finally the Spalart-Allmaras model. For the drag coefficient, Transition SST model is the best, followed by the Spalart-Allmaras model, and finally the Shear Stress Transport kω model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
曲率修正对S809翼型气动系数预测湍流模型的影响
使用适当的程序,计算流体动力学可以预测许多领域的事情,特别是在可再生能源领域,这已经成为一个有前途的研究轴。利用计算流体动力学软件ANSYS Fluent 17.2,研究了曲率修正对S809翼型气动系数预测湍流模型的影响。采用了三种湍流模型:Spalart-Allmaras、剪切应力输运k-ω和过渡海温。本文采用代尔夫特理工大学1.8 m × 1.25 m低湍流风洞的实验结果与雷诺数为106时的数值结果进行了比较。结果表明,曲率修正的使用改善了所使用的所有湍流模型的气动系数预测。由于曲率修正的结果较好,对三种模型进行了比较。对升力系数的计算结果最好的是过渡海温模型,其次是剪切应力输运kω模型,最后是Spalart-Allmaras模型。对于阻力系数而言,Transition SST模式最佳,其次是Spalart-Allmaras模式,最后是剪切应力输运kω模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implications of the Global Race to Net-Zero by 2050 for the Strategic Fleet of Coal-Fired Power Plants in SADC Optimum Design of Mix Ratio of Premixed Iron Tailings Mortar Based on Response Surface Method Evaluation and Comparison of Breach Parametric Model for Embankment Dams Numerical Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Wall Using EPS Geofoam An Investigation of the Mechanical and Durability Properties of Hollow Concrete Blocks Made with Copper Mine Tailings as a Partial Cement Replacement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1