How omnichannel integration promotes customer word-of-mouth behaviors: the mediating roles of perceived personal preference fit and perceived social relatedness

Yang Li, Randall K. J. Tan, Xiang Gong
{"title":"How omnichannel integration promotes customer word-of-mouth behaviors: the mediating roles of perceived personal preference fit and perceived social relatedness","authors":"Yang Li, Randall K. J. Tan, Xiang Gong","doi":"10.1108/itp-06-2021-0440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to investigate the psychological mediating mechanisms through which omnichannel integration affects customer word-of-mouth (WOM) behaviors in omnichannel retailing.Design/methodology/approachGuided by prior omnichannel retailing studies, the authors identify taxonomy of customer WOM behaviors with three archetypes, namely, face-to-face WOM, online store WOM, and social media WOM. Then, the authors draw on social exchange theory (SET) to explain how omnichannel integration influences customer WOM behaviors through the mediating roles of perceived personal preference fit and perceived social relatedness. The authors empirically tested the model using structural equation modeling and multiple mediation analysis with a field survey of 335 omnichannel customers.FindingsPerceived personal preference fit positively influences face-to-face WOM and social media WOM, whereas perceived social relatedness is positively associated with face-to-face WOM, online store WOM, and social media WOM. Furthermore, transactional integration and relational integration positively affect perceived personal preference fit, whereas relational integration has a positive effect on perceived social relatedness. Finally, perceived personal preference fit mediates the effects of transactional integration and relational integration on face-to-face WOM and social media WOM. Perceived social relatedness mediates the effects of relational integration on face-to-face WOM, online store WOM, and social media WOM.Originality/valueThe authors' study advances the omnichannel retailing literature by proposing a taxonomy of customer WOM behaviors in omnichannel retailing and identifying the mediating mechanisms through which omnichannel integration influences customer WOM behaviors.","PeriodicalId":13533,"journal":{"name":"Inf. Technol. People","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inf. Technol. People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-06-2021-0440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to investigate the psychological mediating mechanisms through which omnichannel integration affects customer word-of-mouth (WOM) behaviors in omnichannel retailing.Design/methodology/approachGuided by prior omnichannel retailing studies, the authors identify taxonomy of customer WOM behaviors with three archetypes, namely, face-to-face WOM, online store WOM, and social media WOM. Then, the authors draw on social exchange theory (SET) to explain how omnichannel integration influences customer WOM behaviors through the mediating roles of perceived personal preference fit and perceived social relatedness. The authors empirically tested the model using structural equation modeling and multiple mediation analysis with a field survey of 335 omnichannel customers.FindingsPerceived personal preference fit positively influences face-to-face WOM and social media WOM, whereas perceived social relatedness is positively associated with face-to-face WOM, online store WOM, and social media WOM. Furthermore, transactional integration and relational integration positively affect perceived personal preference fit, whereas relational integration has a positive effect on perceived social relatedness. Finally, perceived personal preference fit mediates the effects of transactional integration and relational integration on face-to-face WOM and social media WOM. Perceived social relatedness mediates the effects of relational integration on face-to-face WOM, online store WOM, and social media WOM.Originality/valueThe authors' study advances the omnichannel retailing literature by proposing a taxonomy of customer WOM behaviors in omnichannel retailing and identifying the mediating mechanisms through which omnichannel integration influences customer WOM behaviors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全渠道整合如何促进顾客口碑行为:感知个人偏好契合度和感知社会关联性的中介作用
目的本研究旨在探讨全渠道整合对全渠道零售顾客口碑行为影响的心理中介机制。设计/方法/途径在先前全渠道零售研究的指导下,作者将客户口碑行为分类为三种原型,即面对面口碑、在线商店口碑和社交媒体口碑。然后,利用社会交换理论(SET)解释了全渠道整合如何通过感知个人偏好契合度和感知社会关联度的中介作用影响顾客口碑行为。通过对335名全渠道客户的实地调查,运用结构方程模型和多重中介分析对模型进行了实证检验。发现感知到的个人偏好契合对面对面口碑和社交媒体口碑有正向影响,而感知到的社会相关性对面对面口碑、在线商店口碑和社交媒体口碑有正向影响。此外,交易整合和关系整合对感知的个人偏好契合有正向影响,而关系整合对感知的社会关联有正向影响。最后,感知个人偏好契合度在交易整合和关系整合对面对面口碑和社交媒体口碑的影响中起中介作用。感知社会关联性在关系整合对面对面口碑、网络商店口碑和社交媒体口碑的影响中起中介作用。作者通过对全渠道零售中顾客口碑行为进行分类,并确定了全渠道整合影响顾客口碑行为的中介机制,从而推动了全渠道零售文献的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Guest editorial: Work from home (WFH), employee productivity and wellbeing: lessons from COVID-19 and future implications Exploring the impact of digital work on work-life balance and job performance: a technology affordance perspective Exploring the effects of different achievement goals on contributor participation in crowdsourcing Supporting participatory innovation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative study of enterprise social media use Understanding customer's meaningful engagement with AI-powered service robots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1