Business Students Have Different Views about Their Performance and Approach to Study in Relation to Exam Formats, Depending on Attitudes Towards Digital Teaching

Leiv Opstad
{"title":"Business Students Have Different Views about Their Performance and Approach to Study in Relation to Exam Formats, Depending on Attitudes Towards Digital Teaching","authors":"Leiv Opstad","doi":"10.30560/ier.v5n1p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to see if there are substantial differences in attitudes towards teaching methods and choice of assessment between the students who are present at campus and to those who prefer the online version. During COVID-19, we got a unique opportunity to compare the students who took the same course and had identical exams. The same questionnaire is distributed to both groups in a compulsory subject in economics at Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). The choice of method is a pairwise comparison of the mean values using T-test. The findings show a significant difference between these two groups. Those who chose to be on campus had higher Grade Point Average (GPA) at high school, and they preferred the traditional form of exams. Those who chose to follow the lectures digitally favoured multiple choice tests, or home-based ‘open book’ exams. This means that both teaching methods and the choice of exam forms can have a major impact on the ranking of the students.","PeriodicalId":13729,"journal":{"name":"International Educational Scientific Research Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Educational Scientific Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30560/ier.v5n1p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this article is to see if there are substantial differences in attitudes towards teaching methods and choice of assessment between the students who are present at campus and to those who prefer the online version. During COVID-19, we got a unique opportunity to compare the students who took the same course and had identical exams. The same questionnaire is distributed to both groups in a compulsory subject in economics at Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). The choice of method is a pairwise comparison of the mean values using T-test. The findings show a significant difference between these two groups. Those who chose to be on campus had higher Grade Point Average (GPA) at high school, and they preferred the traditional form of exams. Those who chose to follow the lectures digitally favoured multiple choice tests, or home-based ‘open book’ exams. This means that both teaching methods and the choice of exam forms can have a major impact on the ranking of the students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
商科学生对考试形式的表现和学习方法有不同的看法,这取决于对数字化教学的态度
本文的目的是看看在校学生和喜欢在线版本的学生之间对教学方法和评估选择的态度是否存在实质性差异。在2019冠状病毒病期间,我们获得了一个独特的机会来比较参加相同课程和相同考试的学生。在挪威科技大学(NTNU)的经济学必修科目中,向两组学生分发了相同的问卷。方法的选择是使用t检验对平均值进行两两比较。研究结果显示,这两组之间存在显著差异。那些选择在校的学生在高中的平均绩点(GPA)更高,他们更喜欢传统的考试形式。那些选择听数字课程的人更喜欢选择题测试,或者在家“开卷”考试。这意味着教学方法和考试形式的选择都会对学生的排名产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Status of the French Language in North Africa The new Norwegian curriculum and integration of knowledge in textbooks in social studies: a comparative study How is Teachers’ Relational Competence Manifested in Online Higher Education Contexts? The Philosophy of Islamic education Based on Moderation Diversity in Indonesia Beyond Teaching and Learning - Rethinking Academic Development in Relation to Quality Enhancement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1