The The European Court of Human Rights’ Approach in the Protection of Rights of Religious Minority Groups

Chemen S. J. Bajalan
{"title":"The The European Court of Human Rights’ Approach in the Protection of Rights of Religious Minority Groups","authors":"Chemen S. J. Bajalan","doi":"10.25079/ukhjss.v4n2y2020.pp28-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is reluctant to distinguish the group right qua group. However, it is impossible to ignore the group dimension in the right to freedom of religion. Such a dimension is clearer in the manifestation of beliefs, which require more common practices than mere beliefs. The Court's decisions when dealing with the freedom of religion tend to be inconsistent because it considers the unique social and political situation of each member state. This limits the scope of the right to freedom of religion and the range of protection of a group's religious rights. Using a literature review and analyzing the case law, this paper highlights the inconsistencies in the Court’s decisions in relation to acknowledging minorities’ religious rights.","PeriodicalId":23495,"journal":{"name":"Volume 7, Issue 1","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 7, Issue 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25079/ukhjss.v4n2y2020.pp28-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is reluctant to distinguish the group right qua group. However, it is impossible to ignore the group dimension in the right to freedom of religion. Such a dimension is clearer in the manifestation of beliefs, which require more common practices than mere beliefs. The Court's decisions when dealing with the freedom of religion tend to be inconsistent because it considers the unique social and political situation of each member state. This limits the scope of the right to freedom of religion and the range of protection of a group's religious rights. Using a literature review and analyzing the case law, this paper highlights the inconsistencies in the Court’s decisions in relation to acknowledging minorities’ religious rights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲人权法院在保护宗教少数群体权利方面的做法
欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)不愿区分群体权利。然而,宗教自由权利的群体维度不容忽视。这种维度在信仰的表现中更加清晰,这需要更多的共同实践,而不仅仅是信仰。法院在处理宗教自由问题时的决定往往不一致,因为它考虑到每个成员国独特的社会和政治情况。这限制了宗教自由权利的范围和保护一个群体宗教权利的范围。通过文献回顾和判例法分析,本文强调了法院在承认少数民族宗教权利方面的判决的不一致之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oyuncuların cinsel tacizin görünürlüğü, önleme ve izleme stratejileriyle ilgili görüşleri İtalya’daki Suriyeli mülteciler ve artan ırkçılık YÖK ulusal tez merkezine kayıtlı e-ticaret alanında yazılan lisansüstü tezlerin bibliyometrik analizi Trend analizi ve yapay sinir ağları: Tarımda bir uygulaması Jacqueline du Pré as 'The Cellist' (2020)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1