Gestörter Wortabruf im kognitiven Modell und im Gehirn – eine Therapiestudie mit 3 Einzelfällen

IF 0.5 Q4 Health Professions Sprache-Stimme-Gehor Pub Date : 2011-03-01 DOI:10.1055/S-0031-1273694
K. Dressel, C. Weiller, W. Huber, S. Abel
{"title":"Gestörter Wortabruf im kognitiven Modell und im Gehirn – eine Therapiestudie mit 3 Einzelfällen","authors":"K. Dressel, C. Weiller, W. Huber, S. Abel","doi":"10.1055/S-0031-1273694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present therapy study, we have for the first time combined cognitive and neural methods of examination in a model-oriented treatment setting for 3 subjects with aphasic word retrieval deficits. Based on a computer-assisted determination of the cognitive lesion in the Dell model, we applied lesion-specific and -unspecific therapies to compare their differential effectiveness. We used a picture/word interference fMRI-paradigm before and after therapy in order to assess therapy-induced changes in brain activation, the functioning of linguistic steps of processing and cognitive control, and the response to priming. As a result, all 3 subjects presented with a lexical-semantic lesion in the Dell model. In 2 subjects, the effectiveness of the lesion-specific semantic therapy was significantly stronger than that of the more unspecific phonological therapy. Due to therapy, brain activations were focused on language regions of the left or both hemispheres. Moreover, all patients recruited parts of the neural network that we had previously found in healthy speakers using the fMRI-paradigm (Abel et al., 2009, NeuroImage). A neural correlate of phonological processing was consistently located in the left superior temporal gyrus. In accordance with the cognitive lesion type, the neural correlate of semantic processing was less pronounced. Furthermore, we detected neural priming for phonological word distractors in all subjects and an additional decrease of cognitive control (monitoring) in 2 subjects. Over and above cognitive-linguistic observations, the individual pattern of brain activations therefore has the potential to indicate the type of disorder, the response to treatment techniques and the optimal therapy procedures.","PeriodicalId":49480,"journal":{"name":"Sprache-Stimme-Gehor","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sprache-Stimme-Gehor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0031-1273694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In the present therapy study, we have for the first time combined cognitive and neural methods of examination in a model-oriented treatment setting for 3 subjects with aphasic word retrieval deficits. Based on a computer-assisted determination of the cognitive lesion in the Dell model, we applied lesion-specific and -unspecific therapies to compare their differential effectiveness. We used a picture/word interference fMRI-paradigm before and after therapy in order to assess therapy-induced changes in brain activation, the functioning of linguistic steps of processing and cognitive control, and the response to priming. As a result, all 3 subjects presented with a lexical-semantic lesion in the Dell model. In 2 subjects, the effectiveness of the lesion-specific semantic therapy was significantly stronger than that of the more unspecific phonological therapy. Due to therapy, brain activations were focused on language regions of the left or both hemispheres. Moreover, all patients recruited parts of the neural network that we had previously found in healthy speakers using the fMRI-paradigm (Abel et al., 2009, NeuroImage). A neural correlate of phonological processing was consistently located in the left superior temporal gyrus. In accordance with the cognitive lesion type, the neural correlate of semantic processing was less pronounced. Furthermore, we detected neural priming for phonological word distractors in all subjects and an additional decrease of cognitive control (monitoring) in 2 subjects. Over and above cognitive-linguistic observations, the individual pattern of brain activations therefore has the potential to indicate the type of disorder, the response to treatment techniques and the optimal therapy procedures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有三个囚犯(一种治疗用
在目前的治疗研究中,我们首次将认知和神经检查方法结合在一个面向模型的治疗环境中,对3名失语单词检索缺陷的受试者进行了治疗。基于戴尔模型中认知损伤的计算机辅助确定,我们应用病变特异性和非特异性治疗来比较它们的不同效果。我们在治疗前后使用图像/单词干扰fmri范式来评估治疗引起的大脑激活、语言处理和认知控制步骤的功能以及对启动的反应的变化。结果,在Dell模型中,3名受试者均出现词汇语义损伤。在2名受试者中,病变特异性语义治疗的效果明显强于非特异性语音治疗。由于治疗,大脑激活集中在左半球或两个半球的语言区域。此外,所有患者都使用了我们之前使用功能磁共振成像范式在健康说话者中发现的部分神经网络(Abel et al., 2009, NeuroImage)。语音处理的神经关联始终位于左侧颞上回。与认知损伤类型一致,语义加工的神经关联不明显。此外,我们发现所有受试者对语音单词干扰物的神经启动,并在2名受试者中发现认知控制(监测)的额外减少。因此,除了认知语言观察之外,大脑激活的个体模式有可能表明疾病的类型、对治疗技术的反应和最佳治疗程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sprache-Stimme-Gehor
Sprache-Stimme-Gehor 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sprache · Stimme · Gehör ist die Fachzeitschrift für alle, die sich mit Sprach-, Stimm- und Hörstörungen beschäftigen – von Logopäden über Phoniater/Pädaudiologen bis hin zu Sprachheilpädagogen oder Hörgeschädigtenpädagogen. Sie vermittelt gesicherte medizinische Fakten für Ihre Fortbildung – maximaler Praxisnutzen, größtmögliche Unterstützung in Ihrem Alltag und der berühmte Blick über den Tellerrand sind unsere Ziele.
期刊最新文献
Bestimmung grammatischer Fähigkeiten von Kindern anhand elizitierter Sprachproduktion – Vorstellung eines neuen Verfahrens Liebe Leserin, lieber Leser, Spracherwerb und digitale Medien Therapie von Sprachentwicklungsstörungen Arbeitsgedächtnisleistungen nach Cochlea-ImplantatVersorgung
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1