Radical Reform in Irish Schools, 1900-1922: The "New Education" Turn by Teresa O'Doherty and Tom O'Donoghue (review)

Brendan Walsh
{"title":"Radical Reform in Irish Schools, 1900-1922: The \"New Education\" Turn by Teresa O'Doherty and Tom O'Donoghue (review)","authors":"Brendan Walsh","doi":"10.1353/hcy.2022.0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"time, Caroline Rusterholz emphasizes the benefits of age-based analyses, arguing that controversies restricted younger teenagers’ access to sexual welfare services, thus complicating the “common narrative about the liberalization of sexuality” (271). Indeed, the methodological breadth of the volume is commendable, from Claudia Soares’ investigation of the mature perspectives of people who had spent time in nineteenth century welfare institutions as children, to Maria Marven’s in-depth analysis of oral history interviews with those who were admitted to convalescent homes between 1932 and 1961. The postscript, which reflects on “why histories of children’s experiences of welfare matter,” is a refreshing conclusion and the decision to make the book open access underscores the editors’ commitment to creating a dialogue with those “who have the power to shape the welfare of children today” (273). Ultimately, this is an engaging and accessible collection that contributes numerous insights to the historiographies of childhood, welfare, and modern Britain, and it is sure to be of interest to researchers and students working in any of these areas. This enjoyable book concludes that “[c]hildren’s experiences of welfare are important, not merely because children are investments for the future, but because their lives matter now” (278) and it should prove valuable to anyone interested in children’s welfare, regardless of their disciplinary or academic affiliations.","PeriodicalId":91623,"journal":{"name":"The journal of the history of childhood and youth","volume":"102 1","pages":"448 - 450"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of the history of childhood and youth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hcy.2022.0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

time, Caroline Rusterholz emphasizes the benefits of age-based analyses, arguing that controversies restricted younger teenagers’ access to sexual welfare services, thus complicating the “common narrative about the liberalization of sexuality” (271). Indeed, the methodological breadth of the volume is commendable, from Claudia Soares’ investigation of the mature perspectives of people who had spent time in nineteenth century welfare institutions as children, to Maria Marven’s in-depth analysis of oral history interviews with those who were admitted to convalescent homes between 1932 and 1961. The postscript, which reflects on “why histories of children’s experiences of welfare matter,” is a refreshing conclusion and the decision to make the book open access underscores the editors’ commitment to creating a dialogue with those “who have the power to shape the welfare of children today” (273). Ultimately, this is an engaging and accessible collection that contributes numerous insights to the historiographies of childhood, welfare, and modern Britain, and it is sure to be of interest to researchers and students working in any of these areas. This enjoyable book concludes that “[c]hildren’s experiences of welfare are important, not merely because children are investments for the future, but because their lives matter now” (278) and it should prove valuable to anyone interested in children’s welfare, regardless of their disciplinary or academic affiliations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1900-1922年爱尔兰学校的激进改革:特蕾莎·奥多尔蒂和汤姆·奥多诺休的“新教育”转向(评论)
Caroline Rusterholz强调了基于年龄的分析的好处,认为争论限制了年轻青少年获得性福利服务的机会,从而使“关于性自由化的共同叙述”复杂化(271)。的确,本书方法论的广度值得称道,从克劳迪娅·苏亚雷斯(Claudia Soares)对19世纪在福利机构度过童年时光的人的成熟视角的调查,到玛丽亚·马文(Maria Marven)对1932年至1961年间住进疗养院的人的口述历史访谈的深入分析。后记反思了“为什么儿童福利经历的历史很重要”,这是一个令人耳目一新的结论,而将这本书开放获取的决定强调了编辑们致力于与那些“有能力塑造当今儿童福利”的人进行对话(273)。最终,这是一本引人入胜、易于理解的合集,为童年、福利和现代英国的历史编纂贡献了许多见解,肯定会引起研究人员和学生在这些领域工作的兴趣。这本令人愉快的书得出结论:“儿童的福利经历很重要,不仅因为儿童是对未来的投资,而且因为他们的生活现在很重要”(278)。对于任何对儿童福利感兴趣的人来说,无论他们的学科或学术背景如何,这本书都应该证明是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Makings and Meanings of Childhood: Parents and the Juvenile Justice System in Interwar Palestine Bridewells, Beterhuizen , and the Ozpizio : Making Men during the Age of Reason Eugenic Continuities: Youth, Sex, Disability, and the Rise of Liberal Eugenics in the Late Twentieth Century "These Small Sumptomes of My Obediense": Negotiating Father-Son Conflict through Letter-Writing in Early Modern England Haunted Dreams: Fantasies of Adolescence in Post-Soviet Culture by Jenny Kaminer (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1