Evaluate the bacterial infections in Indian cirrhotic patients: a prospective study

G. Deepak, B. Rashmi, S. Sonia, S. Stanly, Shaalumol Jose, Ranjan Amit, R. N. Pereira
{"title":"Evaluate the bacterial infections in Indian cirrhotic patients: a prospective study","authors":"G. Deepak, B. Rashmi, S. Sonia, S. Stanly, Shaalumol Jose, Ranjan Amit, R. N. Pereira","doi":"10.18203/2319-2003.IJBCP20212076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Bacterial infections (BI) are more prevalent in liver cirrhosis (LC), high among hospitalized patients. The aim of the study was to explore epidemiological pattern of BI in hospitalized patients with LC with identification of the causative agents. Objective of the study was evaluation of therapeutic/empirical approaches for infections.Methods: Inputs from the body fluid analysis and culture reports were recorded. Child Pugh score (CPS) was used to assess the severity of liver disease. Antibiotic treatment strategy was analysed, prescribed antibiotics were checked for contraindications using Lexicomp software.Results: Of 60 enrolled patients, four had mixed infection and 55% were culture positive. There was a male preponderance (83.3%). BI was more frequent in those aged 51-60 years (38.3%) and >60 years (35%). Higher proportion of patients (60%) belonged to class C of CPS followed by class B (31.7%). The most common causative organisms identified were E. coli (28.5%), K. pneumonia (14.2%), Enterococcus spp (11.4 %) and less common were K. oxytoca, Coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus, gram-positive cocci, gram-negative cocci, P. aeruginosa, S. hemolyticus, ß-hemolytic streptococcus spp. Majority of subjects had spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (36.7%) followed by urinary tract infection (21%), lower respiratory tract infection (18.3%), Sepsis (13.3%), cellulitis (3.3%) and acute gastroenteritis (1.7%). Cephalosporin's (61.7%), (rifaximin) (51.7%), penicillin and β lactamase inhibitors (36.7%) were the common prescribed antimicrobials.Conclusions: There is a positive association between the risk of BI and severity of liver damage.","PeriodicalId":13898,"journal":{"name":"International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology","volume":"36 1","pages":"668"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.IJBCP20212076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bacterial infections (BI) are more prevalent in liver cirrhosis (LC), high among hospitalized patients. The aim of the study was to explore epidemiological pattern of BI in hospitalized patients with LC with identification of the causative agents. Objective of the study was evaluation of therapeutic/empirical approaches for infections.Methods: Inputs from the body fluid analysis and culture reports were recorded. Child Pugh score (CPS) was used to assess the severity of liver disease. Antibiotic treatment strategy was analysed, prescribed antibiotics were checked for contraindications using Lexicomp software.Results: Of 60 enrolled patients, four had mixed infection and 55% were culture positive. There was a male preponderance (83.3%). BI was more frequent in those aged 51-60 years (38.3%) and >60 years (35%). Higher proportion of patients (60%) belonged to class C of CPS followed by class B (31.7%). The most common causative organisms identified were E. coli (28.5%), K. pneumonia (14.2%), Enterococcus spp (11.4 %) and less common were K. oxytoca, Coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus, gram-positive cocci, gram-negative cocci, P. aeruginosa, S. hemolyticus, ß-hemolytic streptococcus spp. Majority of subjects had spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (36.7%) followed by urinary tract infection (21%), lower respiratory tract infection (18.3%), Sepsis (13.3%), cellulitis (3.3%) and acute gastroenteritis (1.7%). Cephalosporin's (61.7%), (rifaximin) (51.7%), penicillin and β lactamase inhibitors (36.7%) were the common prescribed antimicrobials.Conclusions: There is a positive association between the risk of BI and severity of liver damage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估印度肝硬化患者的细菌感染:一项前瞻性研究
背景:细菌性感染(BI)在肝硬化(LC)患者中更为普遍,在住院患者中较高。本研究旨在探讨LC住院患者BI的流行病学模式,并确定致病因素。该研究的目的是评估治疗/经验方法的感染。方法:记录体液分析和培养报告的输入。儿童Pugh评分(CPS)用于评估肝脏疾病的严重程度。分析抗生素治疗策略,使用Lexicomp软件检查处方抗生素禁忌症。结果:60例入组患者中,4例混合性感染,55%培养阳性。男性为优势(83.3%)。BI多见于51 ~ 60岁(38.3%)和>60岁(35%)。C级患者比例较高(60%),其次为B级(31.7%)。最常见的病原菌为大肠杆菌(28.5%)、肺炎克雷伯氏菌(14.2%)、肠球菌(11.4%),较少见的为氧化克雷伯氏菌、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、革兰氏阳性球菌、革兰氏阴性球菌、铜绿假单胞菌、溶血性链球菌、溶血性链球菌。蜂窝织炎(3.3%)和急性胃肠炎(1.7%)。头孢菌素(61.7%)、利福昔明(51.7%)、青霉素和β内酰胺酶抑制剂(36.7%)是常用的抗菌药物。结论:BI风险与肝损害严重程度呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of KaraShieldTM properties in supporting the immune health of healthy subjects: a randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study Knowledge attitude and practices of drug promotional literature: a clinician’s perspective Evaluation of β-blockers dosage regimen rationality in heart failure patients Perceptions of undergraduate medical students of old traditional and new CBME curriculum about pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reactions reporting at a tertiary care teaching hospital: a comparative study Comparison of efficacy of azilsartan with olmesartan in patients of hypertension: randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1