Indigenous parents and child welfare: Mistrust, epistemic injustice, and training

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Social & Legal Studies Pub Date : 2021-12-22 DOI:10.1177/09646639211041476
R. Leckey, Raphael Schmieder-Gropen, C. Nnebe, Miriam Clouthier
{"title":"Indigenous parents and child welfare: Mistrust, epistemic injustice, and training","authors":"R. Leckey, Raphael Schmieder-Gropen, C. Nnebe, Miriam Clouthier","doi":"10.1177/09646639211041476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The settler state's taking of Indigenous children into care disrupts their communities and continues destructive, assimilationist policies. This article presents the perceptions of lawyers, social workers and judges of how Indigenous parents experience child welfare in Quebec. Our participants characterized those experiences negatively. Barriers of language and culture as well as mistrust impede meaningful participation. Parents experience epistemic injustice, wronged in their capacity as knowers. Mistrust also hampers efforts to include Indigenous workers in the system. Emphasizing state workers’ ignorance of Indigenous family practices and the harms of settler colonialism, participants called for greater training. But critical literature on professional education signals the limits of such training to change institutions. Our findings reinforce the jurisdictional calls away from improving the system towards empowering Indigenous peoples to run services of child welfare. The patterns detected and theoretical resources used are relevant to researchers of other institutions that interact with vulnerable populations.","PeriodicalId":47163,"journal":{"name":"Social & Legal Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"559 - 579"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social & Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639211041476","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The settler state's taking of Indigenous children into care disrupts their communities and continues destructive, assimilationist policies. This article presents the perceptions of lawyers, social workers and judges of how Indigenous parents experience child welfare in Quebec. Our participants characterized those experiences negatively. Barriers of language and culture as well as mistrust impede meaningful participation. Parents experience epistemic injustice, wronged in their capacity as knowers. Mistrust also hampers efforts to include Indigenous workers in the system. Emphasizing state workers’ ignorance of Indigenous family practices and the harms of settler colonialism, participants called for greater training. But critical literature on professional education signals the limits of such training to change institutions. Our findings reinforce the jurisdictional calls away from improving the system towards empowering Indigenous peoples to run services of child welfare. The patterns detected and theoretical resources used are relevant to researchers of other institutions that interact with vulnerable populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原住民父母与儿童福利:不信任、认知不公与训练
移民国家对土著儿童的照顾扰乱了他们的社区,并继续实施破坏性的同化政策。这篇文章提出了律师、社会工作者和法官对魁北克土著父母如何体验儿童福利的看法。我们的参与者消极地描述了这些经历。语言和文化的障碍以及不信任阻碍了有意义的参与。父母经历了认知上的不公正,在他们作为知者的身份上受到了委屈。不信任也阻碍了将土著工人纳入该体系的努力。与会者强调国家工作人员对土著家庭习俗和移民殖民主义的危害一无所知,呼吁加强培训。但是,关于职业教育的批判性文献表明,这种培训改变制度的局限性。我们的研究结果强化了司法上的呼吁,从改善制度转向授权土著人民管理儿童福利服务。检测到的模式和使用的理论资源与其他与弱势群体互动的机构的研究人员相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: SOCIAL & LEGAL STUDIES was founded in 1992 to develop progressive, interdisciplinary and critical approaches towards socio-legal study. At the heart of the journal has been a commitment towards feminist, post-colonialist, and socialist economic perspectives on law. These remain core animating principles. We aim to create an intellectual space where diverse traditions and critical approaches within legal study meet. We particularly welcome work in new fields of socio-legal study, as well as non-Western scholarship.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Insecure Guardians: Enforcement, Encounters and Everyday Policing in Postcolonial Karachi by ZOHA WASEEM Book Review: Decolonisation and Legal Knowledge: Reflections on Power and Possibility by FOLUKE ADEBISI Everyday Healthcare Regulation: British Newspapers and Complementary and Alternative Medicine The Revolving Door of Im/Migration: Canadian Refugee Protection and the Production of Migrant Workers Legal Change and Legal Mobilisation: What Does Strategic Litigation Mean for Workers and Trade Unions?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1