A single-blind, randomized study comparing clinical equivalence of Trulene® polypropylene mesh to Prolene® polypropylene mesh in subjects undergoing lichtenstein open repair of primary inguinal hernia secured with sutures

T. Deepak, V. Hangloo, VS S Naga Babu Tippana, SanjoyMohan Bhattacharya, N. Agarwal, A. Moharana
{"title":"A single-blind, randomized study comparing clinical equivalence of Trulene® polypropylene mesh to Prolene® polypropylene mesh in subjects undergoing lichtenstein open repair of primary inguinal hernia secured with sutures","authors":"T. Deepak, V. Hangloo, VS S Naga Babu Tippana, SanjoyMohan Bhattacharya, N. Agarwal, A. Moharana","doi":"10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_32_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia is the most frequently diagnosed abdominal wall hernia. Lichtenstein open repair involving mesh fixation lowers the recurrence rate and risk of postoperative complications. This study compared the clinical equivalence of Trulene® polypropylene mesh (Healthium Medtech Limited) and Prolene® (Ethicon-Johnson & Johnson) polypropylene mesh with respect to recurrence rate of hernia in subjects undergoing Lichtenstein open repair of primary inguinal hernia, secured with sutures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 2020 and November 2022, this multicentric, randomized (1:1), single-blind, prospective, two-arm, parallel-group study (n = 120) was conducted. The primary study endpoint, proportion of subjects having recurrence of hernia within 6 and 12 months of index surgery, was assessed. The secondary endpoints, pain score, number of analgesics, postoperative complications, operative time, length of hospital stay, need for readmission, time to resume back to normal activities and return to work, other adverse events, subject satisfaction score, and quality of life (QOL) postoperatively were also recorded. RESULTS: During the 12-month follow-up period, no recurrence of hernia was recorded. In addition, no significant differences regarding intraoperative mesh parameters, pain score, number of analgesics, postoperative complications, operative time, length of hospital stay, readmission, time to resume normal activities and return to work, and subject satisfaction score and QOL were recorded between Trulene® and Prolene® mesh groups. CONCLUSION: Trulene® polypropylene mesh is clinically equivalent to Prolene® polypropylene mesh. Both meshes are safe and effective for Lichtenstein open repair of primary inguinal hernia with minimal risk of hernia recurrence and chronic pain.","PeriodicalId":34200,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_32_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia is the most frequently diagnosed abdominal wall hernia. Lichtenstein open repair involving mesh fixation lowers the recurrence rate and risk of postoperative complications. This study compared the clinical equivalence of Trulene® polypropylene mesh (Healthium Medtech Limited) and Prolene® (Ethicon-Johnson & Johnson) polypropylene mesh with respect to recurrence rate of hernia in subjects undergoing Lichtenstein open repair of primary inguinal hernia, secured with sutures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 2020 and November 2022, this multicentric, randomized (1:1), single-blind, prospective, two-arm, parallel-group study (n = 120) was conducted. The primary study endpoint, proportion of subjects having recurrence of hernia within 6 and 12 months of index surgery, was assessed. The secondary endpoints, pain score, number of analgesics, postoperative complications, operative time, length of hospital stay, need for readmission, time to resume back to normal activities and return to work, other adverse events, subject satisfaction score, and quality of life (QOL) postoperatively were also recorded. RESULTS: During the 12-month follow-up period, no recurrence of hernia was recorded. In addition, no significant differences regarding intraoperative mesh parameters, pain score, number of analgesics, postoperative complications, operative time, length of hospital stay, readmission, time to resume normal activities and return to work, and subject satisfaction score and QOL were recorded between Trulene® and Prolene® mesh groups. CONCLUSION: Trulene® polypropylene mesh is clinically equivalent to Prolene® polypropylene mesh. Both meshes are safe and effective for Lichtenstein open repair of primary inguinal hernia with minimal risk of hernia recurrence and chronic pain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项单盲、随机研究,比较Trulene®聚丙烯补片与Prolene®聚丙烯补片在缝线固定的原发性腹股沟疝开放性修补术中的临床等效性
背景:腹股沟疝是最常见的腹壁疝。利希滕斯坦开放性修复包括补片固定降低复发率和术后并发症的风险。本研究比较了Trulene®聚丙烯补片(Healthium Medtech Limited)和Prolene®(Ethicon-Johnson & Johnson)聚丙烯补片在缝线固定下行原发性腹股沟疝开放性修补术患者疝复发率方面的临床等效性。材料与方法:在2020年9月至2022年11月期间,进行了这项多中心、随机(1:1)、单盲、前瞻性、双臂、平行组研究(n = 120)。评估主要研究终点,即指数手术后6个月和12个月内疝复发的受试者比例。次要终点、疼痛评分、镇痛药数量、术后并发症、手术时间、住院时间、再入院时间、恢复正常活动和重返工作时间、其他不良事件、受试者满意度评分和术后生活质量(QOL)也被记录下来。结果:随访12个月,无疝复发记录。此外,Trulene®和Prolene®补片组在术中补片参数、疼痛评分、镇痛药数量、术后并发症、手术时间、住院时间、再入院时间、恢复正常活动和重返工作时间、受试者满意度评分和生活质量方面均无显著差异。结论:Trulene®聚丙烯补片与Prolene®聚丙烯补片在临床上具有等效性。这两种补片都是安全有效的,用于原发性腹股沟疝的利希滕斯坦开放性修复,并且具有极小的疝复发风险和慢性疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Flu-like symptoms following botulinum toxin A application before incisional hernia repair: A case report A rare case report of inverse sciatic hernia unveiling as a lipoma Closed-loop obstruction due to internal hernia: An atypical clinical presentation of acute abdomen - A case report Laparoscopic management of delayed traumatic left diaphragmatic hernia with intrathoracic kidney: A rare case report and technical aspects Unique laparoscopic emergency management of traumatic obstructed abdominal wall hernia: A case report and review of literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1