Repeatability of the resonance frequency analysis values in implants with a new technology

Mª Carmen Díaz-Castro, A. Falcão, P. López-Jarana, C. Falcão, J. Ríos-Santos, A. Fernández-Palacín, M. Herrero-Climent
{"title":"Repeatability of the resonance frequency analysis values in implants with a new technology","authors":"Mª Carmen Díaz-Castro, A. Falcão, P. López-Jarana, C. Falcão, J. Ríos-Santos, A. Fernández-Palacín, M. Herrero-Climent","doi":"10.4317/medoral.22761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Assess the reliability (by means of reproducibility and repeatability) of the PenguinRFA system, analyse the ISQ values of different implant types and correlate the ISQ with the insertion torque during the placement of the implant. Material and Methods 120 rough surface implants were placed in bovine bone (type II and III). The implants were divided into groups, according to its design. Once the implants were in place, the exact insertion torque was registered. Then, primary stability was measured by means of the resonance frequency analysis with the PenguinRFA and the Osstell ISQ devices. In each implant two transducers of each device were used. Three measurements were obtained with each transducer. Results The mean ISQ (implant stability quotient) of the whole sample is 67,70 ± 5,51. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is 0,933 and 0,944 for transducers 1 and 2 respectively. The reproducibility is 0,906. The mean insertion torque is 24,54 ± 8,96N. The correlation between the ISQ and the insertion torque is 0,507 p<0,000 (MultiPeg 1) and 0,468 p<0,000 (MultiPeg 2) for bone type II and 0,533 p<0,801 (MultiPeg 1) and 0,193 p<0,140 (MultiPeg 2) for bone type III. Conclusions The results of the present trial suggest that the PenguinRFA presents excellent reproducibility and repeatability, so it could be very useful in the monitoring of the stability of implants over time. Additionally, according to the results, the correlation between the IT and the RFA is low and there are no statistically significant differences in between implant types. Key words:Implant stability, insertion torque, ISQ, osseointegration, implant-supported dental prostheses, immediate dental implant loading.","PeriodicalId":18367,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal","volume":"25 1","pages":"e636 - e642"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background Assess the reliability (by means of reproducibility and repeatability) of the PenguinRFA system, analyse the ISQ values of different implant types and correlate the ISQ with the insertion torque during the placement of the implant. Material and Methods 120 rough surface implants were placed in bovine bone (type II and III). The implants were divided into groups, according to its design. Once the implants were in place, the exact insertion torque was registered. Then, primary stability was measured by means of the resonance frequency analysis with the PenguinRFA and the Osstell ISQ devices. In each implant two transducers of each device were used. Three measurements were obtained with each transducer. Results The mean ISQ (implant stability quotient) of the whole sample is 67,70 ± 5,51. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is 0,933 and 0,944 for transducers 1 and 2 respectively. The reproducibility is 0,906. The mean insertion torque is 24,54 ± 8,96N. The correlation between the ISQ and the insertion torque is 0,507 p<0,000 (MultiPeg 1) and 0,468 p<0,000 (MultiPeg 2) for bone type II and 0,533 p<0,801 (MultiPeg 1) and 0,193 p<0,140 (MultiPeg 2) for bone type III. Conclusions The results of the present trial suggest that the PenguinRFA presents excellent reproducibility and repeatability, so it could be very useful in the monitoring of the stability of implants over time. Additionally, according to the results, the correlation between the IT and the RFA is low and there are no statistically significant differences in between implant types. Key words:Implant stability, insertion torque, ISQ, osseointegration, implant-supported dental prostheses, immediate dental implant loading.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用一种新技术研究植入物中共振频率分析值的可重复性
评估企鹅rfa系统的可靠性(通过再现性和可重复性),分析不同类型植入物的ISQ值,并将ISQ与植入物放置过程中的插入扭矩相关联。材料与方法将120个粗糙表面种植体放置于牛骨中(II型和III型),根据种植体的设计分为不同的组。一旦植入物就位,准确的插入扭矩就会被记录下来。然后,通过企鹅rfa和Osstell ISQ装置的共振频率分析来测量初级稳定性。在每个植入物中使用每个装置的两个换能器。每个传感器进行了三次测量。结果种植体稳定商(ISQ)平均值为67,70±5,51。换能器1和2的类内相关系数(ICC)分别为0,933和0,944。再现性为0,906。平均插入扭矩为24.54±8.96 n。骨型II的ISQ和插入扭矩之间的相关性为0,507 p<0,000 (MultiPeg 1)和0,468 p<0,000 (MultiPeg 2),骨型III的ISQ和插入扭矩之间的相关性为0,533 p<0,801 (MultiPeg 1)和0,193 p<0,140 (MultiPeg 2)。结论实验结果表明,该方法具有良好的再现性和可重复性,可用于监测植入物的稳定性。此外,结果显示,IT与RFA的相关性较低,不同种植体类型间无统计学差异。关键词:种植体稳定性,插入扭矩,ISQ,骨整合,种植体支撑修复体,即刻种植体加载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Actinic cheilitis: Proposal of a clinical index Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the orthognathic quality of life questionnaire in patients with dentofacial deformity Endoscopic findings in periapical surgery. A cross-sectional study of 206 roots Ameloblastomas mimicking apical periodontitis: a case series Influence of root width and dentin wall thickness evaluated by endoscopy upon the outcome of periapical surgery. A cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1