Addition of wheat flour in chicken meatball increases the food value through prompting sensory, physicochemical, biochemical and microbial properties

Meat Research Pub Date : 2022-08-31 DOI:10.55002/mr.2.4.30
MM Touhid, M. Hasan, M. Kamal, MM Islam, M. Azad, M. Hashem
{"title":"Addition of wheat flour in chicken meatball increases the food value through prompting sensory, physicochemical, biochemical and microbial properties","authors":"MM Touhid, M. Hasan, M. Kamal, MM Islam, M. Azad, M. Hashem","doi":"10.55002/mr.2.4.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of different levels (0%, 20%, 25%, and 30%) of wheat flour on the quality characteristics of chicken meatball. After formulation, samples were stored at -20˚C temperature for 60 days and were analyzed on 15th day, 30th day, 45th day and 60th day. The products were analyzed for various sensory (color, flavor, texture, Juiciness, tenderness, overall acceptability), physicochemical (proximate analysis, pH , cooking loss), biochemical (TBARs, POV, FFA) and microbiological (TVC, TCC, TYMC) characteristics. Data were analyzed in a 4x3 factorial experiment in CRD which is replicated three times per cell. Most preferable sensory evaluation (tenderness, overall acceptability and juiciness), preferable physicochemical properties (raw pH , cooked pH ), most acceptable proximate analysis (DM and ash), biochemical properties (PV and TBA values), and microbiological properties (TVC and TCC value) showed significant (p<0.05) result in 25% wheat flour group among the four treatments. Most found in 25% wheat flour group. Among four treatments, the total yeast-mold count in the control sample (1.70 log CFU/g) was significantly (p<0.05) higher than in the samples treated with 20%, 25% and 30% wheat flour group. The less amount of TYMC value indicates this product is most preferable for consumers’ health. 30% and 25% wheat flour were the most preferable for TYMC. Summary of the present study reveals that meatballs made with 25% wheat flour had the highest tenderness, overall acceptability, raw pH , cooked pH , DM, ash, PV and TBA. Prebiotic is a non-digested food ingredient that promotes the growth of beneficial microorganism in the intestine.","PeriodicalId":18312,"journal":{"name":"Meat Research","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat Research","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55002/mr.2.4.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of different levels (0%, 20%, 25%, and 30%) of wheat flour on the quality characteristics of chicken meatball. After formulation, samples were stored at -20˚C temperature for 60 days and were analyzed on 15th day, 30th day, 45th day and 60th day. The products were analyzed for various sensory (color, flavor, texture, Juiciness, tenderness, overall acceptability), physicochemical (proximate analysis, pH , cooking loss), biochemical (TBARs, POV, FFA) and microbiological (TVC, TCC, TYMC) characteristics. Data were analyzed in a 4x3 factorial experiment in CRD which is replicated three times per cell. Most preferable sensory evaluation (tenderness, overall acceptability and juiciness), preferable physicochemical properties (raw pH , cooked pH ), most acceptable proximate analysis (DM and ash), biochemical properties (PV and TBA values), and microbiological properties (TVC and TCC value) showed significant (p<0.05) result in 25% wheat flour group among the four treatments. Most found in 25% wheat flour group. Among four treatments, the total yeast-mold count in the control sample (1.70 log CFU/g) was significantly (p<0.05) higher than in the samples treated with 20%, 25% and 30% wheat flour group. The less amount of TYMC value indicates this product is most preferable for consumers’ health. 30% and 25% wheat flour were the most preferable for TYMC. Summary of the present study reveals that meatballs made with 25% wheat flour had the highest tenderness, overall acceptability, raw pH , cooked pH , DM, ash, PV and TBA. Prebiotic is a non-digested food ingredient that promotes the growth of beneficial microorganism in the intestine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鸡肉丸中添加小麦粉,通过促进肉丸的感官、理化、生化和微生物特性,提高肉丸的食用价值
本试验旨在评价不同水平(0%、20%、25%和30%)小麦粉对鸡肉肉丸品质特性的影响。配制后于-20℃保存60天,分别于第15天、第30天、第45天、第60天进行分析。分析了产品的各种感官(颜色、风味、质地、多汁性、嫩度、总体可接受度)、理化(近似分析、pH、蒸煮损失)、生化(TBARs、POV、FFA)和微生物(TVC、TCC、TYMC)特性。数据在CRD的4x3析因实验中进行分析,每个细胞重复三次。四种处理中,25%小麦粉组的感官评价(嫩度、总体接受度和多汁性)、理化性质(生pH、熟pH)、近似分析(DM和灰分)、生化性质(PV和TBA值)和微生物性质(TVC和TCC值)均显著高于其他处理(p<0.05)。在25%小麦粉组中发现最多。4个处理中,对照样品的酵母菌总数(1.70 log CFU/g)显著(p<0.05)高于添加20%、25%和30%小麦粉组。TYMC值越低,说明该产品对消费者的健康越有利。30%和25%小麦粉对TYMC最有利。本研究总结表明,添加25%小麦粉的肉丸具有最高的嫩度、总体可接受度、生pH值、熟pH值、DM、灰分、PV和TBA。益生元是一种促进肠道有益微生物生长的非消化食物成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study on socio-economic condition of butchers and trend of market price of red meat at some selected areas in Bangladesh Effect of Vacuum and Aerial Packaging on the Quality and Shelf Life of Broiler Meat Treated with Extra Virgin Olive Oil Effect of replacing soybean meal with different levels of processed droppings meal on carcass and meat quality of spent layers Comparison of production characteristics of BLRI-developed layer strain-2 (Shorna) with commercial ISA Brown Effects of dental age on proximate components, amino acid and fatty acid profiles of indigenous beef
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1