Inoculation methods of native strains of Trichoderma sp. and their effect on the growth and yield of quinoa

Betsabe Leon Ttacca, Nora Ortiz Calcina, Luis Pauro Flores, Rodrigo Borja Loza, Paul Mendoza-Coari, Luis Palao Iturregui
{"title":"Inoculation methods of native strains of Trichoderma sp. and their effect on the growth and yield of quinoa","authors":"Betsabe Leon Ttacca, Nora Ortiz Calcina, Luis Pauro Flores, Rodrigo Borja Loza, Paul Mendoza-Coari, Luis Palao Iturregui","doi":"10.47280/revfacagron(luz).v39.n4.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of endophytic fungi is an effective alternative to control pathogens, improve plant metabolism and yield in crops. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of five different strains of Trichoderma sp. on the growth and yield of quinoa plants (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) by using two methods of inoculation: a) pelleted seed, and b) drenching with the endophytic fungi. A completely randomized design with a 2 x 5 factorial arrangement, plus a control with five repetitions was used. The 11 treatments were evaluated with five repetitions. Yield, and aerial and root growth variables were determined. There were no interactions between strains and inoculation methods for aerial plant growth, but there were for root growth and yield. The seed pelleting method produced a higher aerial growth compared to the drench method. In root length, the greatest values were found with the TE-7 and TE-126 strains combined with the pelleted seed method. Likewise, the TE-126 strain induced the greatest dry biomass of roots using the same method. The yield varied between 4147.6 and 3222.7 kg.ha-1 in most of the strain-method combinations, without significant differences between them. Statistically, the control always ranked last, indicating the importance of the seed inoculation. Trichoderma sp. produced increases in vegetative growth and quinoa yield, with TE-7 and TE-126 being the best strains. Furthermore, seed pelleting promoted vegetative growth of the plants, while grain yield was not affected by the inoculation method.","PeriodicalId":54470,"journal":{"name":"Revista De La Facultad De Agronomia De La Universidad Del Zulia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De La Facultad De Agronomia De La Universidad Del Zulia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47280/revfacagron(luz).v39.n4.10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The use of endophytic fungi is an effective alternative to control pathogens, improve plant metabolism and yield in crops. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of five different strains of Trichoderma sp. on the growth and yield of quinoa plants (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) by using two methods of inoculation: a) pelleted seed, and b) drenching with the endophytic fungi. A completely randomized design with a 2 x 5 factorial arrangement, plus a control with five repetitions was used. The 11 treatments were evaluated with five repetitions. Yield, and aerial and root growth variables were determined. There were no interactions between strains and inoculation methods for aerial plant growth, but there were for root growth and yield. The seed pelleting method produced a higher aerial growth compared to the drench method. In root length, the greatest values were found with the TE-7 and TE-126 strains combined with the pelleted seed method. Likewise, the TE-126 strain induced the greatest dry biomass of roots using the same method. The yield varied between 4147.6 and 3222.7 kg.ha-1 in most of the strain-method combinations, without significant differences between them. Statistically, the control always ranked last, indicating the importance of the seed inoculation. Trichoderma sp. produced increases in vegetative growth and quinoa yield, with TE-7 and TE-126 being the best strains. Furthermore, seed pelleting promoted vegetative growth of the plants, while grain yield was not affected by the inoculation method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
木霉原生菌株的接种方法及其对藜麦生长和产量的影响
利用内生真菌是控制病原菌、提高作物代谢和产量的有效替代方法。本研究采用两种接种方法(a)种子颗粒化和b)内生真菌浸水),研究了5种不同菌株木霉对藜麦生长和产量的影响。采用完全随机设计,2 × 5阶乘排列,外加5次重复的对照。对11个处理进行5次重复评价。测定了产量、地上生长和根系生长变量。菌株与接种方式对地上植物生长无交互作用,但对根系生长和产量有交互作用。与水法相比,种子颗粒法产生了更高的空中生长。在根长方面,TE-7和TE-126菌株与粒化种法组合时最大;同样,采用相同的方法,TE-126菌株诱导的根系干生物量最大。产量在4147.6 ~ 3222.7 kg之间变化。Ha-1在大部分应变法组合中均存在,且各应变法组合间无显著差异。统计上,对照总是排在最后,说明种子接种的重要性。木霉对藜麦的营养生长和产量均有促进作用,以TE-7和TE-126菌株效果最好。此外,粒化促进了植株的营养生长,而接种方式对籽粒产量没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía de la Universidad del Zulia publica artículos científicos, notas técnicas, comunicaciones rápidas y artículos invitados originales e inéditos, es decir, que no hayan sido publicados ni enviados simultáneamente a otra revista para su publicación, de autores interesados en el campo agrícola vegetal y agrícola animal. De presentarse el caso que el autor o autores hubiesen enviado o publicado su manuscrito simultáneamente en otra revista, podrán ser sancionados con la no publicación en esta revista por tiempo indefinido. Se admiten manuscritos escritos en idioma Español, Portugués o Inglés, con un resumen en Español o Portugués y otro en Inglés (Abstract).
期刊最新文献
Agroforestry and its vital role in climate change mitigation in the tropics Vinegar elaboration from cherry fruit discard (Prunus cerasus L.) Regenerative livestock or sustainable livestock? Efficiency of entomopathogenic bacteria and fungi on Oligonychus yothersi in vitro and on Persea americana Mill. plants Maturation and germination of somatic embryos of guava var. Cuban Red Dwarf EEA-1840
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1