PeerStudio: Rapid Peer Feedback Emphasizes Revision and Improves Performance

Chinmay Kulkarni, Michael S. Bernstein, Scott R. Klemmer
{"title":"PeerStudio: Rapid Peer Feedback Emphasizes Revision and Improves Performance","authors":"Chinmay Kulkarni, Michael S. Bernstein, Scott R. Klemmer","doi":"10.1145/2724660.2724670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rapid feedback is a core component of mastery learning, but feedback on open-ended work requires days or weeks in most classes today. This paper introduces PeerStudio, an assessment platform that leverages the large number of students' peers in online classes to enable rapid feedback on in-progress work. Students submit their draft, give rubric-based feedback on two peers' drafts, and then receive peer feedback. Students can integrate the feedback and repeat this process as often as they desire. In MOOC deployments, the median student received feedback in just twenty minutes. Rapid feedback on in-progress work improves course outcomes: in a controlled experiment, students' final grades improved when feedback was delivered quickly, but not if delayed by 24 hours. More than 3,600 students have used PeerStudio in eight classes, both massive and in-person. This research demonstrates how large classes can leverage their scale to encourage mastery through rapid feedback and revision.","PeriodicalId":20664,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"178","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2724670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 178

Abstract

Rapid feedback is a core component of mastery learning, but feedback on open-ended work requires days or weeks in most classes today. This paper introduces PeerStudio, an assessment platform that leverages the large number of students' peers in online classes to enable rapid feedback on in-progress work. Students submit their draft, give rubric-based feedback on two peers' drafts, and then receive peer feedback. Students can integrate the feedback and repeat this process as often as they desire. In MOOC deployments, the median student received feedback in just twenty minutes. Rapid feedback on in-progress work improves course outcomes: in a controlled experiment, students' final grades improved when feedback was delivered quickly, but not if delayed by 24 hours. More than 3,600 students have used PeerStudio in eight classes, both massive and in-person. This research demonstrates how large classes can leverage their scale to encourage mastery through rapid feedback and revision.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PeerStudio:快速同伴反馈强调修改和提高性能
快速反馈是精通学习的核心组成部分,但在今天的大多数课程中,开放式作业的反馈需要几天或几周的时间。本文介绍了PeerStudio,这是一个评估平台,它利用在线课程中大量学生的同龄人来实现对正在进行的工作的快速反馈。学生提交他们的草稿,对两个同学的草稿给出基于规则的反馈,然后收到同学的反馈。学生可以整合反馈,并按照自己的意愿重复这个过程。在MOOC部署中,学生收到反馈的平均时间是20分钟。对正在进行的作业的快速反馈提高了课程效果:在一项对照实验中,当反馈快速传递时,学生的最终成绩会有所提高,但如果延迟24小时则不会。超过3600名学生在8堂课上使用了PeerStudio,包括大规模的和面对面的。这项研究证明了大班是如何利用他们的规模,通过快速的反馈和修改来鼓励学生精通的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning is Not a Spectator Sport: Doing is Better than Watching for Learning from a MOOC Learnersourcing of Complex Assessments All It Takes Is One: Evidence for a Strategy for Seeding Large Scale Peer Learning Interactions Designing MOOCs as Interactive Places for Collaborative Learning Who You Are or What You Do: Comparing the Predictive Power of Demographics vs. Activity Patterns in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1