Flight Type and Seasonal Movements Are Important Predictors for Avian Collisions in Wind Farms

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Western Birds Pub Date : 2023-02-09 DOI:10.3390/birds4010007
Alfonso Balmori-de la Puente, A. Balmori
{"title":"Flight Type and Seasonal Movements Are Important Predictors for Avian Collisions in Wind Farms","authors":"Alfonso Balmori-de la Puente, A. Balmori","doi":"10.3390/birds4010007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wind farms are an alternative energy source mitigating environmental pollution. However, they can have adverse effects, causing an increase in mortality for wildlife through collision with wind turbines. The aim of this study was to investigate the risks of bird collisions with wind turbines linked to species-specific variables. For this purpose, we have analysed the dead birds involved in wind farm collisions that were admitted to two rescue centres in Spain over a period of 16 years (2001–2016; full dataset: n = 3130). All the birds analysed in this study were killed by turbines in wind farms. We performed two linear models using all species and a reduced dataset (bird of prey and passerine having more than four collisions) that included group, seasonal movements, flight type, length, and the number of pairs for the Spanish and European populations. The coefficients and the percent of variance explained by each relevant variable were determined in the models and the real values were compared with predicted values to visualise the goodness of fit. We found that the flight type was the most important variable explaining 35% of the total variability for the model including all species and 29% for the reduced dataset respectively, followed by seasonal movement type (4%/17% respectively) and the Spanish population (4%/6%). Subsequent analyses suggested that species with hovering, song-flights and active soaring flights are more susceptible to collisions with wind farms, and that species showing partial migration have a significant peak of collisions across spring and autumn. The estimated species-specific collision index can help in modelling the theoretical risk of collision with wind turbines, depending on the species existing in the area and their predicted values of vulnerability, which is linked to flight types and seasonal movements.","PeriodicalId":52426,"journal":{"name":"Western Birds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Birds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/birds4010007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wind farms are an alternative energy source mitigating environmental pollution. However, they can have adverse effects, causing an increase in mortality for wildlife through collision with wind turbines. The aim of this study was to investigate the risks of bird collisions with wind turbines linked to species-specific variables. For this purpose, we have analysed the dead birds involved in wind farm collisions that were admitted to two rescue centres in Spain over a period of 16 years (2001–2016; full dataset: n = 3130). All the birds analysed in this study were killed by turbines in wind farms. We performed two linear models using all species and a reduced dataset (bird of prey and passerine having more than four collisions) that included group, seasonal movements, flight type, length, and the number of pairs for the Spanish and European populations. The coefficients and the percent of variance explained by each relevant variable were determined in the models and the real values were compared with predicted values to visualise the goodness of fit. We found that the flight type was the most important variable explaining 35% of the total variability for the model including all species and 29% for the reduced dataset respectively, followed by seasonal movement type (4%/17% respectively) and the Spanish population (4%/6%). Subsequent analyses suggested that species with hovering, song-flights and active soaring flights are more susceptible to collisions with wind farms, and that species showing partial migration have a significant peak of collisions across spring and autumn. The estimated species-specific collision index can help in modelling the theoretical risk of collision with wind turbines, depending on the species existing in the area and their predicted values of vulnerability, which is linked to flight types and seasonal movements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
飞行类型和季节运动是风电场中鸟类碰撞的重要预测因素
风力发电厂是一种替代能源,可以减轻环境污染。然而,它们也会产生不利影响,通过与风力涡轮机碰撞导致野生动物死亡率增加。这项研究的目的是调查鸟类与风力涡轮机碰撞的风险与物种特定变量的关系。为此,我们分析了16年间(2001年至2016年;完整数据集:n = 3130)。在这项研究中分析的所有鸟类都是被风电场的涡轮机杀死的。我们使用所有物种和一个简化的数据集(猛禽和雀鸟有超过四次碰撞)进行了两个线性模型,包括西班牙和欧洲种群的群体、季节运动、飞行类型、长度和配对数量。在模型中确定每个相关变量解释的系数和方差百分比,并将实际值与预测值进行比较,以显示拟合优度。我们发现,在包括所有物种的模型中,飞行类型是最重要的变量,分别解释了35%和29%的总变异性,其次是季节性移动类型(分别为4%/17%)和西班牙种群(分别为4%/6%)。随后的分析表明,悬停、歌唱飞行和主动翱翔的物种更容易与风电场发生碰撞,而部分迁徙的物种在春季和秋季有显著的碰撞高峰。估计的特定物种碰撞指数可以帮助模拟与风力涡轮机碰撞的理论风险,这取决于该地区现有的物种及其预测的脆弱性值,这与飞行类型和季节性移动有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Western Birds
Western Birds Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
David F. DeSante’s Birds of Cabo San Lucas, Fall 1968: A Historic Account First Record of Tricolored Blackbirds in Idaho American Crow Cracks Open Bivalve via Automobile Second Prebasic Molt of a Black-headed Gull at Anchorage, Alaska Nesting Bald Eagle Population Numbers, Density, Territorial Resources, and Relationship to Human Development in Northern Colorado’s Front Range
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1