Censorship In Social Media: Political Satire and the Internet’s “Oppositionists”

{"title":"Censorship In Social Media: Political Satire and the Internet’s “Oppositionists”","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jhss.03.01.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Censorship has been prevalent through time in various forms, at different historical periods all over the world. It is negatively\nperceived, and it is considered to undermine democracy and violate human rights. As a rule, it is a feature that characterises\nconservative societies, totalitarian regimes, as well as individuals with ideological preconceptions. The areas mostly affected\nby it include freedom of expression and free movement of ideas. Governments try to ward themselves against this phenomenon\nin various manners, in particular by establishing laws that protect human goods and moral values, as those have been shaped\nfrom the Age of Enlightenment onwards. However, in recent years, in the midst of the rapid dissemination of technology and the\nswift development of social media, a tendency has emerged consisting in trying to influence the unsuspecting public opinion and\nresulting in excluding from the public sphere opinions which are not pleasant to part of the media users, often serving “external”\ninterests. Therefore, the online medium, free par excellence and offering, in principle, the possibility to everyone to publicly and\ncourageously express their opinions, hinders and becomes an obstacle to the dissemination of “another” opinion, in spite of this\ndissemination being the ultimate intellectual feature of contemporary societies. This type of censorship has now been included\nin the long list of the many aspects of the phenomenon seen to this day.","PeriodicalId":32779,"journal":{"name":"Mizoram University Journal of Humanities Social Sciences","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mizoram University Journal of Humanities Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jhss.03.01.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Censorship has been prevalent through time in various forms, at different historical periods all over the world. It is negatively perceived, and it is considered to undermine democracy and violate human rights. As a rule, it is a feature that characterises conservative societies, totalitarian regimes, as well as individuals with ideological preconceptions. The areas mostly affected by it include freedom of expression and free movement of ideas. Governments try to ward themselves against this phenomenon in various manners, in particular by establishing laws that protect human goods and moral values, as those have been shaped from the Age of Enlightenment onwards. However, in recent years, in the midst of the rapid dissemination of technology and the swift development of social media, a tendency has emerged consisting in trying to influence the unsuspecting public opinion and resulting in excluding from the public sphere opinions which are not pleasant to part of the media users, often serving “external” interests. Therefore, the online medium, free par excellence and offering, in principle, the possibility to everyone to publicly and courageously express their opinions, hinders and becomes an obstacle to the dissemination of “another” opinion, in spite of this dissemination being the ultimate intellectual feature of contemporary societies. This type of censorship has now been included in the long list of the many aspects of the phenomenon seen to this day.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体的审查制度:政治讽刺与互联网的“反对派”
在世界各地不同的历史时期,审查制度一直以各种形式盛行。它被认为是负面的,被认为是破坏民主和侵犯人权。通常,这是保守社会、极权主义政权以及具有意识形态先入为主观念的个人的特征。受其影响最大的领域包括言论自由和思想自由流动。各国政府试图以各种方式防止这种现象,特别是通过制定保护人类利益和道德价值观的法律,这些法律自启蒙时代以来就已形成。然而,近年来,在技术的快速传播和社交媒体的迅速发展中,出现了一种倾向,即试图影响不知情的公众舆论,导致部分媒体用户不满意的意见被排除在公共领域之外,往往是为了“外部”利益。因此,免费的网络媒介,原则上为每个人公开、勇敢地表达自己的观点提供了可能,阻碍并成为传播“另一种”观点的障碍,尽管这种传播是当代社会的终极智力特征。这种类型的审查现在已经被包括在今天所看到的现象的许多方面的长清单中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
of Discretion Assessment of spatial suitability of ecotourism sites in Al-Ahsa governorate, Saudi Arabia, by using GIS: تقييم الملاءمة المكانية لمواقع السياحة البيئية في محافظة الأحساء بالمملكة العربية السعودية باستخدام نظم المعلومات الجغرافية Urban growth trends in city of Taif Analyzed with geographical information systems: اتجاهات النمو العمراني بمدينة الطائف باستخدام نظم المعلومات الجغرافية Dialogue Discourse and Ideology of Popular Superstition: The Omani short story as a model: الخطاب الحواري وإيديولوجية الفكر الخرافي الشعبي: القصة القصيرة العُمانية نموذجًا Methods of Using Twitter in Marketing the Activities of Public Relations Departments in the Saudi Airline Market: أساليب استخدام تويتر في الأنشطة التسويقية لإدارات العلاقات العامة بسوق الطيران السعودي
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1