{"title":"Censorship In Social Media: Political Satire and the Internet’s “Oppositionists”","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jhss.03.01.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Censorship has been prevalent through time in various forms, at different historical periods all over the world. It is negatively\nperceived, and it is considered to undermine democracy and violate human rights. As a rule, it is a feature that characterises\nconservative societies, totalitarian regimes, as well as individuals with ideological preconceptions. The areas mostly affected\nby it include freedom of expression and free movement of ideas. Governments try to ward themselves against this phenomenon\nin various manners, in particular by establishing laws that protect human goods and moral values, as those have been shaped\nfrom the Age of Enlightenment onwards. However, in recent years, in the midst of the rapid dissemination of technology and the\nswift development of social media, a tendency has emerged consisting in trying to influence the unsuspecting public opinion and\nresulting in excluding from the public sphere opinions which are not pleasant to part of the media users, often serving “external”\ninterests. Therefore, the online medium, free par excellence and offering, in principle, the possibility to everyone to publicly and\ncourageously express their opinions, hinders and becomes an obstacle to the dissemination of “another” opinion, in spite of this\ndissemination being the ultimate intellectual feature of contemporary societies. This type of censorship has now been included\nin the long list of the many aspects of the phenomenon seen to this day.","PeriodicalId":32779,"journal":{"name":"Mizoram University Journal of Humanities Social Sciences","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mizoram University Journal of Humanities Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jhss.03.01.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Censorship has been prevalent through time in various forms, at different historical periods all over the world. It is negatively
perceived, and it is considered to undermine democracy and violate human rights. As a rule, it is a feature that characterises
conservative societies, totalitarian regimes, as well as individuals with ideological preconceptions. The areas mostly affected
by it include freedom of expression and free movement of ideas. Governments try to ward themselves against this phenomenon
in various manners, in particular by establishing laws that protect human goods and moral values, as those have been shaped
from the Age of Enlightenment onwards. However, in recent years, in the midst of the rapid dissemination of technology and the
swift development of social media, a tendency has emerged consisting in trying to influence the unsuspecting public opinion and
resulting in excluding from the public sphere opinions which are not pleasant to part of the media users, often serving “external”
interests. Therefore, the online medium, free par excellence and offering, in principle, the possibility to everyone to publicly and
courageously express their opinions, hinders and becomes an obstacle to the dissemination of “another” opinion, in spite of this
dissemination being the ultimate intellectual feature of contemporary societies. This type of censorship has now been included
in the long list of the many aspects of the phenomenon seen to this day.