Sixty years of manned space flight in the light of Russian legislation in the field of radiation safety. Basic principles in Russian manned flights. Part 2 (in the order of discussion)

V. A. Sakovich
{"title":"Sixty years of manned space flight in the light of Russian legislation in the field of radiation safety. Basic principles in Russian manned flights. Part 2 (in the order of discussion)","authors":"V. A. Sakovich","doi":"10.21870/0131-3878-2022-31-2-62-75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is the second of two interrelated ones, in which, in order to discuss from the point of view the basic principles of ensuring radiation safety, the 60-year evolution of the regulation of radiation safety of space flights (RSSF) and radiation safety in ground conditions is compared. The first article is devoted to the analysis of the implementation of basic principles in the recom-mendations of the ICRP and in Russian legislation. It is recognized that the principles played a positive methodological role, but at present the inclusion of their wording in legal and regulatory documents seems unnecessary to the author. In this article, a detailed analysis of documents regulating the RSSF and the implementation of the basic principles in them is carried out. It is concluded that the concept of risk is more fully used in relation to RSSF and even standards have been adopted for its calculation. It is argued that the arguments proposed to reduce dose limits for near-Earth flights contradict basic principles. The need for such a reduction is denied. It is proposed to carry out the planned changes of FL of RSP and NRS in relation to various conditions and circumstances of exposure, including to allocate RSSF in FL RSP as a special area of regulation.","PeriodicalId":6315,"journal":{"name":"\"Radiation and Risk\" Bulletin of the National Radiation and Epidemiological Registry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"\"Radiation and Risk\" Bulletin of the National Radiation and Epidemiological Registry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21870/0131-3878-2022-31-2-62-75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is the second of two interrelated ones, in which, in order to discuss from the point of view the basic principles of ensuring radiation safety, the 60-year evolution of the regulation of radiation safety of space flights (RSSF) and radiation safety in ground conditions is compared. The first article is devoted to the analysis of the implementation of basic principles in the recom-mendations of the ICRP and in Russian legislation. It is recognized that the principles played a positive methodological role, but at present the inclusion of their wording in legal and regulatory documents seems unnecessary to the author. In this article, a detailed analysis of documents regulating the RSSF and the implementation of the basic principles in them is carried out. It is concluded that the concept of risk is more fully used in relation to RSSF and even standards have been adopted for its calculation. It is argued that the arguments proposed to reduce dose limits for near-Earth flights contradict basic principles. The need for such a reduction is denied. It is proposed to carry out the planned changes of FL of RSP and NRS in relation to various conditions and circumstances of exposure, including to allocate RSSF in FL RSP as a special area of regulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
载人航天飞行六十年来俄罗斯在辐射安全领域的立法。俄罗斯载人飞行的基本原理。第2部分(按讨论顺序)
本文是两篇相互关联的文章中的第二篇,从确保辐射安全的基本原则的角度,比较了60年来空间飞行辐射安全法规和地面辐射安全法规的演变。第一篇文章专门分析了ICRP各项建议和俄罗斯立法中基本原则的执行情况。人们认识到,这些原则在方法论上发挥了积极的作用,但目前在法律和规章文件中列入这些原则的措辞对作者来说似乎没有必要。本文对规范RSSF的文件及其基本原则的实施进行了详细的分析。结论是在RSSF中更充分地使用了风险的概念,甚至采用了标准来计算RSSF。有人认为,提议降低近地飞行剂量限制的论点违背了基本原则。这种削减的必要性被否定了。建议根据不同的暴露条件和情况,对RSP和NRS的RSSF进行计划变更,包括将FL RSP中的RSSF分配为一个特殊的监管区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pilot-demonstration energy complex (PDEC): the level of radiological protection of the population due to the modern “dose-effect” model of the ICRP Distribution of the ambient dose equivalent rate of gamma radiation in specially protected natural areas of the Rostov region Application of unified methodology for analytical calculation of absorbed dose gamma-radiation fractions to cylinder-shape biological objects Assessments of uncertainties in effective radiation doses to the population in the contaminated regions of the Russian Federation after the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident Evaluation of the operational intervention levels for radiation protection of the public based on the emergency scenarios at Russian nuclear power plants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1