Current opinions in inguinal hernia emergencies: A comprehensive review of related evidences

H. Kulaçoğlu
{"title":"Current opinions in inguinal hernia emergencies: A comprehensive review of related evidences","authors":"H. Kulaçoğlu","doi":"10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_30_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Groins hernia emergencies are evaluated under two definitions: incarceration that is defined as a hernia in which its content becomes irreducible at the passage in the abdominal wall and strangulation that compromises the blood supply to the omentum and/or intestines within the hernia sac. The purpose of this paper was to determine the latest knowledge about groin hernia emergencies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed and Google Scholar searches were done by using combinations of “inguinal hernia” and “emergency”, and “groin hernia” and “emergency” keywords at first. More detailed searches were performed to enrich the “Surgical treatment” part of the paper by using “emergency hernia” and “mesh”, “emergency hernia,” and “laparoscopic versus open” keywords afterward. RESULTS: Approximately 5%–10% of all inguinal repairs are performed in emergency settings. Both lateral and medial inguinal hernias can get incarcerated or strangulated, whereas the risk for femoral hernias is higher. Manual reduction of incarcerated inguinal hernias is successful in approximately 60% of the cases. The prediction of bowel ischemia due to strangulation may be possible with some blood tests and imaging studies like ultrasound and computed tomography. It has been shown that the longer the duration of incarceration the higher the risk of bowel ischemia. Bowel resection which is more frequently necessary in patients with advanced age, female gender, and femoral hernia, is associated with an increased risk of perioperative mortality. Some surgeons still use tissue-suture repairs in an emergency setting; however, mesh repairs have been shown to be safe unless there is an overt contamination. CONCLUSION: Early treatment of complicated groin hernias is the key to favorable outcomes. The need for bowel resection and advanced age are the most prominent factors for morbidity and mortality. Mesh repairs are safe in most cases. Minimally invasive approaches promise good results in experienced centers.","PeriodicalId":34200,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_30_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Groins hernia emergencies are evaluated under two definitions: incarceration that is defined as a hernia in which its content becomes irreducible at the passage in the abdominal wall and strangulation that compromises the blood supply to the omentum and/or intestines within the hernia sac. The purpose of this paper was to determine the latest knowledge about groin hernia emergencies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed and Google Scholar searches were done by using combinations of “inguinal hernia” and “emergency”, and “groin hernia” and “emergency” keywords at first. More detailed searches were performed to enrich the “Surgical treatment” part of the paper by using “emergency hernia” and “mesh”, “emergency hernia,” and “laparoscopic versus open” keywords afterward. RESULTS: Approximately 5%–10% of all inguinal repairs are performed in emergency settings. Both lateral and medial inguinal hernias can get incarcerated or strangulated, whereas the risk for femoral hernias is higher. Manual reduction of incarcerated inguinal hernias is successful in approximately 60% of the cases. The prediction of bowel ischemia due to strangulation may be possible with some blood tests and imaging studies like ultrasound and computed tomography. It has been shown that the longer the duration of incarceration the higher the risk of bowel ischemia. Bowel resection which is more frequently necessary in patients with advanced age, female gender, and femoral hernia, is associated with an increased risk of perioperative mortality. Some surgeons still use tissue-suture repairs in an emergency setting; however, mesh repairs have been shown to be safe unless there is an overt contamination. CONCLUSION: Early treatment of complicated groin hernias is the key to favorable outcomes. The need for bowel resection and advanced age are the most prominent factors for morbidity and mortality. Mesh repairs are safe in most cases. Minimally invasive approaches promise good results in experienced centers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当前对腹股沟疝急诊的看法:相关证据的综合回顾
腹股沟疝的紧急情况有两种定义:嵌顿是指疝的内容物在腹壁通道处变得无法减少,而绞窄是指疝囊内的大网膜和/或肠的血液供应受到损害。本文的目的是确定腹股沟疝紧急情况的最新知识。材料与方法:首先使用“腹股沟疝”和“急诊”组合关键词,首先使用“腹股沟疝”和“急诊”组合关键词进行PubMed和Google Scholar搜索。随后使用“emergency hernia”和“mesh”、“emergency hernia”和“腹腔镜与开放”等关键词进行更详细的搜索,丰富了文章的“外科治疗”部分。结果:大约5%-10%的腹股沟修复是在紧急情况下进行的。腹股沟外侧疝和内侧疝都可能嵌顿或绞窄,而股疝的风险更高。人工复位嵌顿腹股沟疝的成功率约为60%。通过一些血液检查和影像学研究,如超声和计算机断层扫描,可以预测绞窄引起的肠缺血。研究表明,监禁时间越长,肠缺血的风险越高。高龄、女性和股疝患者更需要肠切除术,这与围手术期死亡风险增加有关。一些外科医生在紧急情况下仍然使用组织缝合修复;然而,网状修复已被证明是安全的,除非有明显的污染。结论:早期治疗是复杂性腹股沟疝获得良好预后的关键。需要肠切除术和高龄是发病率和死亡率最突出的因素。补片修补在大多数情况下是安全的。微创方法在经验丰富的中心有望取得良好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Flu-like symptoms following botulinum toxin A application before incisional hernia repair: A case report A rare case report of inverse sciatic hernia unveiling as a lipoma Closed-loop obstruction due to internal hernia: An atypical clinical presentation of acute abdomen - A case report Laparoscopic management of delayed traumatic left diaphragmatic hernia with intrathoracic kidney: A rare case report and technical aspects Unique laparoscopic emergency management of traumatic obstructed abdominal wall hernia: A case report and review of literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1