Motives of the Yugoslav-Bulgarian Integration after World War II and in the Post-War Period

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL ISSUES Drustvena Istrazivanja Pub Date : 2022-10-03 DOI:10.5559/di.31.3.07
Igor Ivašković
{"title":"Motives of the Yugoslav-Bulgarian Integration after World War II and in the Post-War Period","authors":"Igor Ivašković","doi":"10.5559/di.31.3.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to present the motives of the geopolitical restructuring of South-East Europe at the end of World War II with an emphasis on relations between Yugoslavia and Bulgaria. In this context, the author first identifies the interwar interests of four involved parties, namely: the Yugoslav and Bulgarian communist leaderships, and the political representatives of the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom. In the second part, the author describes the development of the idea of Yugoslav-Bulgarian integration after the War, first during the period of rapprochement between two communist parties, and then in the period of the Cominform crisis and the dramatic turnaround in their relations. Besides different macro- -geopolitical visions, the author also identifies significant differences in motives at the micro-geopolitical level. Contrary to the proclaimed idea of the 'South Slavic Brotherhood', the Communist Party of Yugoslavia perceived the idea foremost as a maneuvering tool in its relations with the UK and the Soviets, while the Bulgarian Communist Party used the (con)federal idea for pursuing multi-layered interests. It was primarily a part of the strategy for resolving the Macedonian question, but the alliance with Yugoslavia was also a tool for protecting Bulgarian territories in the relations with Greece, and consequently leverage for strengthening the internal position of Bulgarian communists in the post-war consolidation process.","PeriodicalId":45161,"journal":{"name":"Drustvena Istrazivanja","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drustvena Istrazivanja","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5559/di.31.3.07","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to present the motives of the geopolitical restructuring of South-East Europe at the end of World War II with an emphasis on relations between Yugoslavia and Bulgaria. In this context, the author first identifies the interwar interests of four involved parties, namely: the Yugoslav and Bulgarian communist leaderships, and the political representatives of the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom. In the second part, the author describes the development of the idea of Yugoslav-Bulgarian integration after the War, first during the period of rapprochement between two communist parties, and then in the period of the Cominform crisis and the dramatic turnaround in their relations. Besides different macro- -geopolitical visions, the author also identifies significant differences in motives at the micro-geopolitical level. Contrary to the proclaimed idea of the 'South Slavic Brotherhood', the Communist Party of Yugoslavia perceived the idea foremost as a maneuvering tool in its relations with the UK and the Soviets, while the Bulgarian Communist Party used the (con)federal idea for pursuing multi-layered interests. It was primarily a part of the strategy for resolving the Macedonian question, but the alliance with Yugoslavia was also a tool for protecting Bulgarian territories in the relations with Greece, and consequently leverage for strengthening the internal position of Bulgarian communists in the post-war consolidation process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第二次世界大战后南斯拉夫-保加利亚一体化的动因
本文旨在介绍二战结束时东南欧地缘政治重组的动机,重点是南斯拉夫和保加利亚之间的关系。在这方面,作者首先确定了四个有关方面在两次世界大战之间的利益,即:南斯拉夫和保加利亚共产党领导人以及苏联和联合王国的政治代表。在第二部分中,作者描述了战后南斯拉夫-保加利亚一体化思想的发展,首先是在两个共产党之间的和解时期,然后是在情报危机时期和他们关系的戏剧性转变。除了宏观地缘政治愿景的不同,作者还发现了微观地缘政治层面动机的显著差异。与宣称的“南斯拉夫兄弟会”理念相反,南斯拉夫共产党首先将这一理念视为与英国和苏联关系中的一种操纵工具,而保加利亚共产党则利用(虚假)联邦理念来追求多层次的利益。这主要是解决马其顿问题的战略的一部分,但与南斯拉夫的联盟也是在与希腊的关系中保护保加利亚领土的工具,并因此在战后巩固进程中加强保加利亚共产党人的内部地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
33
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Društvena istraživanja is a journal for general social issues, embracing complete thematic and disciplinary openness. It publishes works in different social disciplines (sociology, psychology, political science, psychiatry, history, law, economics, demography, linguistics etc.), but also publishes work that transcends the frontiers of individual disciplines. Papers are subject to anonymous review procedures. Indexed in: Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences (CC/S&BS)
期刊最新文献
The Association Between National Human Resource Management Practices and Measures and Correlates of National Happiness The Relationship Between Global and Contextualised Personality and Workplace Burnout in Secondary School Teachers What is the Role of Locus of Control in Responses to Remote Job Offers? A High-Powered Study of Unemployed Participants in Retraining Courses The Association Between National Human Resource Management Practices and Measures and Correlates of National Happiness How Do Personal Networks Affect Adherence to Epidemiological Measures, Vaccine Hesitancy, and the Risk Assessment of COVID-19?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1