Issues of discrepancy between the original and ostensible from the book of inheritance by collection and study: مسائل تعارض الأصل والظاهر في كتاب الفرائض: جمعًا ودراسة

Alaa Ahmad Altayyar Alaa Ahmad Altayyar
{"title":"Issues of discrepancy between the original and ostensible from the book of inheritance by collection and study: مسائل تعارض الأصل والظاهر في كتاب الفرائض: جمعًا ودراسة","authors":"Alaa Ahmad Altayyar Alaa Ahmad Altayyar","doi":"10.26389/ajsrp.y270121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"  The research aims to collect issues that contradict the origin and the apparent mentioned in the chapter on the obligations, and study them in a comparative jurisprudential study that shows the position of the original, the apparent position and the face of the contradiction, and then weighting one of them with the evidence, and the method used in the study is the inductive and deductive approach. The most important findings of the study is that: There may be a conflict between origins and ostensible such as evidence and the weights in which the conflict occurs, according to the human view, not according to the fact of the matter, because religion does not conflict, if we find that there is a conflict between us, we collect the original and pure and face the conflict even We remove what appeared to us from conflict, it is required to implement the issue three conditions: the union of origin and ostensible in her , and the realization of the conflict between the origin and the apparent, and the difference in the time of the occurrence of the origin and the apparent, and I can not say that the issues i collected are all issues that conflict the origin and the ostensible in these sections, but they are what I have reached by reading, research.","PeriodicalId":17009,"journal":{"name":"journal of sciences islamic republic of iran","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"journal of sciences islamic republic of iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26389/ajsrp.y270121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  The research aims to collect issues that contradict the origin and the apparent mentioned in the chapter on the obligations, and study them in a comparative jurisprudential study that shows the position of the original, the apparent position and the face of the contradiction, and then weighting one of them with the evidence, and the method used in the study is the inductive and deductive approach. The most important findings of the study is that: There may be a conflict between origins and ostensible such as evidence and the weights in which the conflict occurs, according to the human view, not according to the fact of the matter, because religion does not conflict, if we find that there is a conflict between us, we collect the original and pure and face the conflict even We remove what appeared to us from conflict, it is required to implement the issue three conditions: the union of origin and ostensible in her , and the realization of the conflict between the origin and the apparent, and the difference in the time of the occurrence of the origin and the apparent, and I can not say that the issues i collected are all issues that conflict the origin and the ostensible in these sections, but they are what I have reached by reading, research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本研究旨在收集义务一章中提到的与起源和表见相矛盾的问题,用比较法学的方法研究它们,表明起源的立场、表见的立场和矛盾的面对,然后用证据对其中一个进行加权,研究的方法是归纳和演绎的方法。研究最重要的发现是:可能会有冲突的起源和证据和权重等表面上的冲突发生时,根据人类的观点,而不是根据事实,因为宗教信仰不冲突,如果我们发现我们之间有冲突,我们收集原始和纯和面对冲突甚至我们消除了冲突,应实现问题三个条件:起源和表面的结合,以及起源和表面之间冲突的实现,以及起源和表面发生时间的差异,我不能说我收集的问题都是这些章节中起源和表面冲突的问题,但它们是我通过阅读,研究得出的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
journal of sciences islamic republic of iran
journal of sciences islamic republic of iran Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The method of Imam Al-Damiry (D. 808 AH) in Al-Jarh and Al-Ta’deel through his book Al-Najm Al-Wahaj fi explain Al-Minhaj ما يُخْرَجُ مِنْ رَأْسِ المَالِ، وما يُخْرَجُ مِنْ الثُّلُثِ ضوابط العمارة في القرآن الكريم الإمام إسماعيل بن القاسم ومخطوطه (مسألة طلاق الدور): دراسة وتحقيق ابن مظفر اليمني وكتابه الكواكب النيرة (دراسة وتحقيق بابي الرجعة والاختلاف)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1