Evaluation of the Component Separation Technique for Treatment of Patients with Large Incisional Hernia

Kunwar Aggarwal
{"title":"Evaluation of the Component Separation Technique for Treatment of Patients with Large Incisional Hernia","authors":"Kunwar Aggarwal","doi":"10.18311/IJMDS/2021/26738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Incisional hernia remains a frequent complication of abdominal surgery. Results of surgical repair are disappointing with recurrence rates of suture repair being in the range of 5–63% depending upon the type of repair used, with better results using mesh implantation. In extreme cases a large hernial defect exists with a “loss of abdominal domain”. In addition, the approximated rectus muscles under tension become hypoper fused leading to atrophy and increased chances of recurrence. For the management of such large hernias, interest has been generated in the “ Component Separation Technique ”. This technique relaxes abdominal wall by translation of muscular layers without severing the innervation and blood supply, with or without the mesh augmentation. This can accommodate for defects up to 25–30cm in the waistline. However, wound complications are frequent and reported in up to half of the patients. Thus, the study was planned in view of the potential benefits of “CST” and its capability to restore lost abdominal domain. Methods: The study was conducted on 20 patients with “Large Incisional Hernia” with defect size >5cm or with a surface area >50cm 2 operated upon with component separation. Outcome was measured over a follow up period of three months in terms of recurrence and other local complications. Result: There were 20 patients [3 men and 17 women; 70% cases above the age of 50years]. Mean defect size was 9.5cm [range = 6–20cm]. Average body mass index was 28.97kg/m 2 [range = 22–37kg/ m 2 ]. Mean duration of hospital stay was 9 days [range = 5–21 days]. Early complications occurred in 15% (3/20) cases and post-operative abdominal compartment or recurrence was not reported over a follow up period of 3 months. Conclusions: It is finally concluded that “Large Incisional Hernias” can be effectively treated by “Component Separation Technique”","PeriodicalId":14010,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences","volume":"34 1","pages":"2011-2017"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18311/IJMDS/2021/26738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Incisional hernia remains a frequent complication of abdominal surgery. Results of surgical repair are disappointing with recurrence rates of suture repair being in the range of 5–63% depending upon the type of repair used, with better results using mesh implantation. In extreme cases a large hernial defect exists with a “loss of abdominal domain”. In addition, the approximated rectus muscles under tension become hypoper fused leading to atrophy and increased chances of recurrence. For the management of such large hernias, interest has been generated in the “ Component Separation Technique ”. This technique relaxes abdominal wall by translation of muscular layers without severing the innervation and blood supply, with or without the mesh augmentation. This can accommodate for defects up to 25–30cm in the waistline. However, wound complications are frequent and reported in up to half of the patients. Thus, the study was planned in view of the potential benefits of “CST” and its capability to restore lost abdominal domain. Methods: The study was conducted on 20 patients with “Large Incisional Hernia” with defect size >5cm or with a surface area >50cm 2 operated upon with component separation. Outcome was measured over a follow up period of three months in terms of recurrence and other local complications. Result: There were 20 patients [3 men and 17 women; 70% cases above the age of 50years]. Mean defect size was 9.5cm [range = 6–20cm]. Average body mass index was 28.97kg/m 2 [range = 22–37kg/ m 2 ]. Mean duration of hospital stay was 9 days [range = 5–21 days]. Early complications occurred in 15% (3/20) cases and post-operative abdominal compartment or recurrence was not reported over a follow up period of 3 months. Conclusions: It is finally concluded that “Large Incisional Hernias” can be effectively treated by “Component Separation Technique”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成分分离技术治疗大切口疝的疗效评价
背景:切口疝仍然是腹部手术的常见并发症。手术修复的结果令人失望,根据使用的修复类型,缝线修复的复发率在5-63%之间,使用补片植入效果更好。在极端情况下,存在巨大的疝缺损,并伴有“腹部区域的丧失”。此外,紧绷的近直肌融合不良,导致萎缩和复发的机会增加。对于这种大疝的治疗,“成分分离技术”引起了人们的兴趣。该技术通过肌肉层的平移来放松腹壁,而不切断神经支配和血液供应,有或没有网状物增强。这可以适应腰围25 - 30厘米的缺陷。然而,伤口并发症是常见的,报告在多达一半的患者。因此,考虑到“CST”的潜在益处及其恢复失去的腹部区域的能力,计划进行这项研究。方法:选取缺损尺寸>5cm或表面积>50cm 2的“大切口疝”患者20例,采用组份分离手术。结果是在随访三个月后根据复发率和其他局部并发症来衡量的。结果:共20例患者,男3例,女17例;50岁以上病例占70%]。平均缺陷尺寸为9.5cm[范围= 6-20cm]。平均体重指数28.97kg/ m2[取值范围为22 ~ 37kg/ m2]。平均住院时间9天[范围5 ~ 21天]。15%(3/20)病例出现早期并发症,术后腹腔隔室或随访3个月未见复发。结论:“成分分离技术”可有效治疗“大切口疝”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Topical Application of Citrus limon Peel Essential Oil Increased Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines Expression on Type IV Hypersensitivity Reaction Role of Intraoral Scanners in Pediatric Dentistry The Wider Meaning of Addiction Antibacterial Power of Nano Brown Anchovy (Stolephorus insularis) Against Mixed Bacteria in Deep Dentin Caries Scientific Integrity-Overcoming Challenges in Medical Research and Publication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1