Taking the 'Non' Out of Non-GAAP: Routine Non-GAAP Usage and Investor Pricing

Sarah E. McVay, E. Rodriguez-Vazquez, Sara Toynbee
{"title":"Taking the 'Non' Out of Non-GAAP: Routine Non-GAAP Usage and Investor Pricing","authors":"Sarah E. McVay, E. Rodriguez-Vazquez, Sara Toynbee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3820094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Earnings are an important input for equity investors’ valuation decisions. Managers and analysts increasingly report non-GAAP earnings on an ongoing basis, routinely removing recurring items, such as amortization and stock-based compensation, from GAAP earnings. We document that by 2019, non-GAAP earnings were used in all prior eight quarters for 38 percent of firms. The routine use of non-GAAP earnings for the same firm quarter after quarter suggests that non-GAAP has become the “generally accepted” earnings measure for valuation purposes for a significant portion of publicly-traded firms. We provide evidence that routine non-GAAP usage allows investors to gain experience with non-GAAP earnings that facilitates their pricing of non-GAAP exclusions. Our findings point to a capital markets consequence of the shift from the traditional use of non-GAAP, in which adjustments are made for transitory earnings shocks, to the routine use of non-GAAP, in which adjustments are made for both recurring and transitory components of earnings.","PeriodicalId":12319,"journal":{"name":"Financial Accounting eJournal","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Accounting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3820094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Earnings are an important input for equity investors’ valuation decisions. Managers and analysts increasingly report non-GAAP earnings on an ongoing basis, routinely removing recurring items, such as amortization and stock-based compensation, from GAAP earnings. We document that by 2019, non-GAAP earnings were used in all prior eight quarters for 38 percent of firms. The routine use of non-GAAP earnings for the same firm quarter after quarter suggests that non-GAAP has become the “generally accepted” earnings measure for valuation purposes for a significant portion of publicly-traded firms. We provide evidence that routine non-GAAP usage allows investors to gain experience with non-GAAP earnings that facilitates their pricing of non-GAAP exclusions. Our findings point to a capital markets consequence of the shift from the traditional use of non-GAAP, in which adjustments are made for transitory earnings shocks, to the routine use of non-GAAP, in which adjustments are made for both recurring and transitory components of earnings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从非公认会计准则中剔除“非”:常规的非公认会计准则使用和投资者定价
收益是股票投资者估值决策的重要输入。经理和分析师越来越多地在持续的基础上报告非公认会计准则收益,通常从公认会计准则收益中删除经常性项目,如摊销和股票薪酬。我们发现,到2019年,38%的公司在前8个季度都使用了非公认会计准则收益。对同一家公司一个季度又一个季度的非公认会计准则收益的常规使用表明,非公认会计准则已成为很大一部分上市公司估值目的的“普遍接受的”收益衡量标准。我们提供的证据表明,常规的非gaap使用可以让投资者获得非gaap收益的经验,从而促进他们对非gaap排除的定价。我们的研究结果指出了资本市场从传统使用非公认会计准则(对暂时性收益冲击进行调整)转变为常规使用非公认会计准则(对经常性和暂时性收益进行调整)的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sustainability Accounting Does Insider Trading Activity Separate Winners and Losers when a Peer Firm Restates? Director Connectedness and Advising Quality: The Role of Inside and Outside Directors Why do Managers Manage the Tone? Evidence from China The 'Big N' Audit Quality Kerfuffle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1