Scaling of fibre area and fibre glycogen concentration in the hindlimb musculature of monitor lizards: implications for locomotor performance with increasing body size.

Robert L. Cieri, T. Dick, Jeremy S. Morris, C. Clemente
{"title":"Scaling of fibre area and fibre glycogen concentration in the hindlimb musculature of monitor lizards: implications for locomotor performance with increasing body size.","authors":"Robert L. Cieri, T. Dick, Jeremy S. Morris, C. Clemente","doi":"10.1242/jeb.243380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A considerable biomechanical challenge faces larger terrestrial animals as the demands of body support scale with body mass (Mb), while muscle force capacity is proportional to muscle cross-sectional area, which scales with Mb2/3. How muscles adjust to this challenge might be best understood by examining varanids, which vary by five orders of magnitude in size without substantial changes in posture or body proportions. Muscle mass, fascicle length and physiological cross-sectional area all scale with positive allometry, but it remains unclear, however, how muscles become larger in this clade. Do larger varanids have more muscle fibres, or does individual fibre cross-sectional area (fCSA) increase? It is also unknown if larger animals compensate by increasing the proportion of fast-twitch (higher glycogen concentration) fibres, which can produce higher force per unit area than slow-twitch fibres. We investigated muscle fibre area and glycogen concentration in hindlimb muscles from varanids ranging from 105 g to 40,000 g. We found that fCSA increased with modest positive scaling against body mass (Mb0.197) among all our samples, and ∝Mb0.278 among a subset of our data consisting of never-frozen samples only. The proportion of low-glycogen fibres decreased significantly in some muscles but not others. We compared our results with the scaling of fCSA in different groups. Considering species means, fCSA scaled more steeply in invertebrates (∝Mb0.575), fish (∝Mb0.347) and other reptiles (∝Mb0.308) compared with varanids (∝Mb0.267), which had a slightly higher scaling exponent than birds (∝Mb0.134) and mammals (∝Mb0.122). This suggests that, while fCSA generally increases with body size, the extent of this scaling is taxon specific, and may relate to broad differences in locomotor function, metabolism and habitat between different clades.","PeriodicalId":22458,"journal":{"name":"THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.243380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

A considerable biomechanical challenge faces larger terrestrial animals as the demands of body support scale with body mass (Mb), while muscle force capacity is proportional to muscle cross-sectional area, which scales with Mb2/3. How muscles adjust to this challenge might be best understood by examining varanids, which vary by five orders of magnitude in size without substantial changes in posture or body proportions. Muscle mass, fascicle length and physiological cross-sectional area all scale with positive allometry, but it remains unclear, however, how muscles become larger in this clade. Do larger varanids have more muscle fibres, or does individual fibre cross-sectional area (fCSA) increase? It is also unknown if larger animals compensate by increasing the proportion of fast-twitch (higher glycogen concentration) fibres, which can produce higher force per unit area than slow-twitch fibres. We investigated muscle fibre area and glycogen concentration in hindlimb muscles from varanids ranging from 105 g to 40,000 g. We found that fCSA increased with modest positive scaling against body mass (Mb0.197) among all our samples, and ∝Mb0.278 among a subset of our data consisting of never-frozen samples only. The proportion of low-glycogen fibres decreased significantly in some muscles but not others. We compared our results with the scaling of fCSA in different groups. Considering species means, fCSA scaled more steeply in invertebrates (∝Mb0.575), fish (∝Mb0.347) and other reptiles (∝Mb0.308) compared with varanids (∝Mb0.267), which had a slightly higher scaling exponent than birds (∝Mb0.134) and mammals (∝Mb0.122). This suggests that, while fCSA generally increases with body size, the extent of this scaling is taxon specific, and may relate to broad differences in locomotor function, metabolism and habitat between different clades.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巨蜥后肢肌肉纤维面积和纤维糖原浓度的变化:体型增大对运动表现的影响。
大型陆生动物面临着相当大的生物力学挑战,因为身体支撑需求与体重(Mb)成正比,而肌肉力量容量与肌肉横截面积成正比,肌肉横截面积与Mb2/3成正比。肌肉是如何适应这一挑战的,最好的理解方法是检查类人猿,它们的大小变化有五个数量级,但姿势或身体比例却没有实质性的变化。肌肉质量、肌束长度和生理截面积均呈正异速生长,但尚不清楚该支系的肌肉是如何变大的。更大的变种动物有更多的肌肉纤维,还是单个纤维横截面积(fCSA)增加?同样不清楚的是,大型动物是否会通过增加快肌纤维(糖原浓度较高)的比例来进行补偿,快肌纤维每单位面积产生的力量比慢肌纤维大。我们研究了从105 g到40000 g不等的变种动物后肢肌肉的肌纤维面积和糖原浓度。我们发现,在所有样本中,fCSA随体重呈适度正比例增加(Mb0.197),在仅由未冷冻样本组成的数据子集中,fCSA∝Mb0.278。低糖原纤维的比例在一些肌肉中显著下降,但在其他肌肉中没有。我们将我们的结果与不同组的fCSA评分进行比较。考虑物种平均值,与变形目(∝Mb0.267)相比,无脊椎动物(∝Mb0.575)、鱼类(∝Mb0.347)和其他爬行动物(∝Mb0.308)的fCSA扩展幅度更大,变形目的扩展指数略高于鸟类(∝Mb0.134)和哺乳动物(∝Mb0.122)。这表明,虽然fCSA通常随着体型的增大而增加,但这种增加的程度是分类单元特有的,可能与不同进化枝在运动功能、代谢和栖息地方面的广泛差异有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction: Altitude alters how frogs keep their cool. Putting a new spin on insect jumping performance using 3D modeling and computer simulations of spotted lanternfly nymphs Strong positive allometry of bite force in leaf-cutter ants increases the range of cuttable plant tissues Reconstructing the pressure field around swimming fish using a physics-informed neural network Linking muscle mechanics to the metabolic cost of human hopping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1