High faecal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) among hospitalized patients at Sylvanus Olympio Teaching Hospital, Lomé, Togo in 2019

A. M. Godonou, F. Lack, F. Gbeasor-Komlanvi, L. Konlani, S. Dossim, Y. Ameyapoh, K. Ekouévi, A. Dagnra, M. Salou
{"title":"High faecal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) among hospitalized patients at Sylvanus Olympio Teaching Hospital, Lomé, Togo in 2019","authors":"A. M. Godonou, F. Lack, F. Gbeasor-Komlanvi, L. Konlani, S. Dossim, Y. Ameyapoh, K. Ekouévi, A. Dagnra, M. Salou","doi":"10.4314/ajcem.v23i1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) are a global health concern, associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Even in the absence of infections, colonization by these pathogens is still a great threat because of the risk of cross transfer among hospitalized patients. Faecal carriage of ESBL-PE remained poorly documented in Africa. This study aimed to determine faecal carriage rate of ESBL-PE, factors associated with carriage, and antimicrobial susceptibility of the strains among hospitalized patients at Sylvanus Olympio Teaching Hospitals (CHU SO) in Lomé, Togo. \nMethodology: This was a cross-sectional study of 105 randomly selected hospitalized patients between September and November 2019. Socio-demographic and clinical data as well as rectal swabs were collected after obtaining the consent of the selected participants. Rectal swabs were cultured on selective bromocresol purple (BCP) lactose agar containing 6µg/l ceftazidime, for isolation of Enterobacteriaceae. Identification of each isolate was performed using Uriselect 4 medium and API 20E. Antibiotic susceptibility of the bacterial isolates was performed by the Bauer-Kirby agar disc diffusion test and interpreted according to CASFM-EUCAST recommendations. \nResults: The faecal carriage rate of ESBL-PE among selected hospitalized patients was 80.9% (85/105). Escherichia coli was the most frequent bacteria 69.5% (73/105), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae 22.8% (24/105). The antibiotic profile of ESBL producing Escherichia coli showed resistance to amoxycillin+clavulanic acid (72.6%), ticarcillin+clavulanic acid (82.2%), piperacillin+tazobactam (30.1%), cefoxitin (30.1%) ciprofloxacin (84.9%), levofloxacin (76.7%), nalidixic acid (83.6%), chloramphenicol (26.0%), gentamicin (49.3%), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (86.3%), imipenem (5.5%), and ertapenem (21.9%). All (100%) isolates were sensitive to amikacin and fosfomycin. None of the characteristics or risk factors assessed was significantly associated with faecal carriage of ESBL-PE. \nConclusion: Faecal carriage rate of ESBL-PE in these hospitalized patients was very high, but no factor was associated with carriage of ESBL-PE among the study population. Implementation of infection control measures, and surveillance are needed to limit the spread of these resistant pathogens within CHU SO healthcare facilities.","PeriodicalId":7415,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Clinical and Experimental Microbiology","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Clinical and Experimental Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ajcem.v23i1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) are a global health concern, associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Even in the absence of infections, colonization by these pathogens is still a great threat because of the risk of cross transfer among hospitalized patients. Faecal carriage of ESBL-PE remained poorly documented in Africa. This study aimed to determine faecal carriage rate of ESBL-PE, factors associated with carriage, and antimicrobial susceptibility of the strains among hospitalized patients at Sylvanus Olympio Teaching Hospitals (CHU SO) in Lomé, Togo. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study of 105 randomly selected hospitalized patients between September and November 2019. Socio-demographic and clinical data as well as rectal swabs were collected after obtaining the consent of the selected participants. Rectal swabs were cultured on selective bromocresol purple (BCP) lactose agar containing 6µg/l ceftazidime, for isolation of Enterobacteriaceae. Identification of each isolate was performed using Uriselect 4 medium and API 20E. Antibiotic susceptibility of the bacterial isolates was performed by the Bauer-Kirby agar disc diffusion test and interpreted according to CASFM-EUCAST recommendations. Results: The faecal carriage rate of ESBL-PE among selected hospitalized patients was 80.9% (85/105). Escherichia coli was the most frequent bacteria 69.5% (73/105), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae 22.8% (24/105). The antibiotic profile of ESBL producing Escherichia coli showed resistance to amoxycillin+clavulanic acid (72.6%), ticarcillin+clavulanic acid (82.2%), piperacillin+tazobactam (30.1%), cefoxitin (30.1%) ciprofloxacin (84.9%), levofloxacin (76.7%), nalidixic acid (83.6%), chloramphenicol (26.0%), gentamicin (49.3%), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (86.3%), imipenem (5.5%), and ertapenem (21.9%). All (100%) isolates were sensitive to amikacin and fosfomycin. None of the characteristics or risk factors assessed was significantly associated with faecal carriage of ESBL-PE. Conclusion: Faecal carriage rate of ESBL-PE in these hospitalized patients was very high, but no factor was associated with carriage of ESBL-PE among the study population. Implementation of infection control measures, and surveillance are needed to limit the spread of these resistant pathogens within CHU SO healthcare facilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019年,多哥洛姆洛伊市希尔瓦努斯奥林匹奥教学医院住院患者中产广谱β -内酰胺酶肠杆菌科(ESBL-PE)的粪便运输量高
背景:产生广谱β -内酰胺酶的肠杆菌科(ESBL-PE)是一个全球性的健康问题,与发病率和死亡率增加有关。即使在没有感染的情况下,这些病原体的定植仍然是一个巨大的威胁,因为在住院患者之间存在交叉转移的风险。在非洲,关于ESBL-PE粪便携带的记录仍然很少。本研究旨在确定多哥洛莫雷市希尔瓦努斯奥林匹奥教学医院(CHU SO)住院患者中ESBL-PE的粪便携带率、携带相关因素以及菌株的抗菌药物敏感性。方法:这是一项横断面研究,在2019年9月至11月期间随机选择105名住院患者。在获得选定参与者的同意后,收集社会人口统计学和临床数据以及直肠拭子。直肠拭子在含有6µg/l头孢他啶的选择性溴甲酚紫(BCP)乳糖琼脂培养基上培养,分离肠杆菌科细菌。使用Uriselect 4培养基和API 20E对每个分离株进行鉴定。采用Bauer-Kirby琼脂碟扩散试验对分离的细菌进行抗生素敏感性检测,并根据CASFM-EUCAST推荐进行解释。结果:入选住院患者ESBL-PE粪便携带率为80.9%(85/105)。大肠杆菌最多,占69.5%(73/105),其次是肺炎克雷伯菌,占22.8%(24/105)。产ESBL的大肠埃希菌对阿莫西林+克拉维酸(72.6%)、替卡西林+克拉维酸(82.2%)、哌拉西林+他唑巴坦(30.1%)、头孢西丁(30.1%)、环丙沙星(84.9%)、左氧氟沙星(76.7%)、萘啶酸(83.6%)、氯霉素(26.0%)、庆大霉素(49.3%)、磺胺甲恶唑-甲氧苄啶(86.3%)、亚胺培南(5.5%)、厄他培南(21.9%)耐药。所有(100%)分离株对阿米卡星和磷霉素敏感。所评估的所有特征或危险因素均与ESBL-PE的粪便携带显著相关。结论:这些住院患者粪便中ESBL-PE的携带率很高,但研究人群中没有与ESBL-PE携带相关的因素。需要实施感染控制措施和监测,以限制这些耐药病原体在CHU SO卫生保健设施内的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phylogenetic diversity and susceptibility of Candida species from women using contraceptive devices in northcentral Nigeria HIV status of individuals who underwent pre-employment medical screening at a federal tertiary health institution in southeast Nigeria Isolation and biocontrol of bacteriophages from wastewater in the city of Lomé, Togo: potential application as a novel source for antimicrobial therapy Aerobic vaginitis in women seen at the laboratory of the university hospital of Befelatanana, Antananarivo, Madagascar Serological and molecular detection of hepatitis C virus among students in a tertiary educational institution in Calabar, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1