Attention-direction versus retrieval practice: which fosters the productive recall of German formulaic sequences best?

IF 0.9 4区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Vial-Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics Pub Date : 2020-01-20 DOI:10.35869/vial.v0i17.1463
Griet Boone, June Eyckmans
{"title":"Attention-direction versus retrieval practice: which fosters the productive recall of German formulaic sequences best?","authors":"Griet Boone, June Eyckmans","doi":"10.35869/vial.v0i17.1463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports on a classroom-based (quasi)-experiment with a pre-test post-test design that explored the effect of two types of activities on the productive recall of German formulaic sequences (FS): 1) attention-directing activities and 2) retrieval practice. Two intact classes of Dutch-speaking university students of German participated in the study. One class was randomly assigned to the attention-directing condition (n=18), the other one to the retrieval condition (n=11). Twenty-two target FS were selected as learning items. Each group processed the FS in a different condition. In the attention-directing condition, students had to 1) re-read a video transcript with the FS in bold typeface and 2) translate the targets into Dutch. In the retrieval condition, students had to 1) complete a transcript in which the FS were deleted and 2) translate the targets into German. Results indicate that the retrieval condition led to better productive phrase learning than the attention-directing condition.","PeriodicalId":42598,"journal":{"name":"Vial-Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vial-Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35869/vial.v0i17.1463","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reports on a classroom-based (quasi)-experiment with a pre-test post-test design that explored the effect of two types of activities on the productive recall of German formulaic sequences (FS): 1) attention-directing activities and 2) retrieval practice. Two intact classes of Dutch-speaking university students of German participated in the study. One class was randomly assigned to the attention-directing condition (n=18), the other one to the retrieval condition (n=11). Twenty-two target FS were selected as learning items. Each group processed the FS in a different condition. In the attention-directing condition, students had to 1) re-read a video transcript with the FS in bold typeface and 2) translate the targets into Dutch. In the retrieval condition, students had to 1) complete a transcript in which the FS were deleted and 2) translate the targets into German. Results indicate that the retrieval condition led to better productive phrase learning than the attention-directing condition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注意方向与检索练习:哪个最能促进德语公式化序列的生产性回忆?
本文报道了一项基于课堂的准实验,采用前测后测设计,探讨了两种类型的活动对德国公式化序列(FS)生产性回忆的影响:1)注意引导活动和2)检索练习。两个完整的荷兰语德语大学生班级参与了这项研究。一组随机分配到注意引导组(n=18),另一组随机分配到检索组(n=11)。选取22个目标FS作为学习项目。各组在不同条件下处理FS。在注意力引导条件下,学生们必须1)重读一段粗体的视频文本,2)将目标翻译成荷兰语。在检索条件下,学生必须1)完成一份删除FS的成绩单,2)将目标翻译成德语。结果表明,检索条件比注意引导条件更能促进生产性短语学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
How complex is professional academic writing? A corpus-based analysis of research articles in 'hard' and 'soft' disciplines Collaborative writing and patterns of interaction in young learners: The interplay between pair dynamics and pairing method in LRE production Metaphors set in motion in the context of L2 academic spoken discourse An analysis of language anxiety in English and Basque-Medium Instruction: A study with primary school students Computational analysis of adjuncts in ASD-STE100 for the NLP parser ARTEMIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1