Reflection on ResearchGate's Terminating ResearchGate Score, and Interest Score, as Social Media Altmetrics and Academic Evaluation Tools

IF 1.2 4区 管理学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Scholarly Publishing Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.3138/jsp-2022-0043
J. A. Teixeira da Silva, Yuki Yamada
{"title":"Reflection on ResearchGate's Terminating ResearchGate Score, and Interest Score, as Social Media Altmetrics and Academic Evaluation Tools","authors":"J. A. Teixeira da Silva, Yuki Yamada","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:ResearchGate (RG) is a popular academic social media networking platform for scientists, researchers, or academics (SRAs). RG automatically provides a metric, the RG Score, to each RG account holder that serves as a measure of that SRA's \"academic\" worth, productivity, and interaction with other SRAs. In 2017, this metric was described by RG as \"the RG Score takes all your research and turns it into a source of reputation,\" indicating that \"it is calculated based on the research in your profile and how other researchers interact with your content.\" However, the precise manner in which the RG Score is calculated was never made public because it is a proprietary algorithm, and requests to RG to disclose details of the equations used to calculate it were not met. Not unsurprisingly, RG announced that it would be phasing out the RG Score in June 2022. This article examines what is known in the literature about the RG Score, which may be perceived as a skewed metric because it may add excessive weighting to select aspects, such as questions and answers, rather than to the published literature of an SRA. The RG Interest Score is also critiqued. An author-based metric such as the RG Score that reflects a realistic balance between the most important academic factors while downplaying fairly redundant aspects such as the volume of answers might benefit SRAs. As for any metric, the RG Score should not be used in isolation, be gamed, or used as the basis of any financial remuneration schemes.","PeriodicalId":44613,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","volume":"16 1","pages":"239 - 259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp-2022-0043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:ResearchGate (RG) is a popular academic social media networking platform for scientists, researchers, or academics (SRAs). RG automatically provides a metric, the RG Score, to each RG account holder that serves as a measure of that SRA's "academic" worth, productivity, and interaction with other SRAs. In 2017, this metric was described by RG as "the RG Score takes all your research and turns it into a source of reputation," indicating that "it is calculated based on the research in your profile and how other researchers interact with your content." However, the precise manner in which the RG Score is calculated was never made public because it is a proprietary algorithm, and requests to RG to disclose details of the equations used to calculate it were not met. Not unsurprisingly, RG announced that it would be phasing out the RG Score in June 2022. This article examines what is known in the literature about the RG Score, which may be perceived as a skewed metric because it may add excessive weighting to select aspects, such as questions and answers, rather than to the published literature of an SRA. The RG Interest Score is also critiqued. An author-based metric such as the RG Score that reflects a realistic balance between the most important academic factors while downplaying fairly redundant aspects such as the volume of answers might benefit SRAs. As for any metric, the RG Score should not be used in isolation, be gamed, or used as the basis of any financial remuneration schemes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于ResearchGate终止ResearchGate评分和兴趣评分作为社交媒体替代指标和学术评估工具的思考
摘要:ResearchGate (RG)是一个面向科学家、研究人员或学者(sra)的热门学术社交媒体网络平台。RG自动为每个RG帐户持有人提供一个度量,即RG分数,作为该SRA的“学术”价值、生产力以及与其他SRA的交互的度量。2017年,RG将这一指标描述为“RG评分将你所有的研究转化为声誉的来源”,表明“它是根据你个人资料中的研究以及其他研究人员如何与你的内容互动来计算的。”然而,RG分数的精确计算方式从未公开,因为它是一种专有算法,并且要求RG披露用于计算它的方程式的细节没有得到满足。不出所料,RG宣布将在2022年6月逐步淘汰RG评分。本文研究了文献中关于RG分数的已知内容,RG分数可能被认为是一个倾斜的度量标准,因为它可能会对某些方面(如问题和答案)增加过多的权重,而不是对SRA的已发表文献。RG兴趣评分也受到了批评。基于作者的指标,如RG分数,反映了最重要的学术因素之间的现实平衡,同时淡化了相当冗余的方面,如答案的数量,可能有利于sra。对于任何指标,RG评分都不应该被孤立地使用,也不应该被玩弄,或者用作任何财务薪酬计划的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: For more than 40 years, the Journal of Scholarly Publishing has been the authoritative voice of academic publishing. The journal combines philosophical analysis with practical advice and aspires to explain, argue, discuss, and question the large collection of new topics that continually arise in the publishing field. JSP has also examined the future of scholarly publishing, scholarship on the web, digitization, copyright, editorial policies, computer applications, marketing, and pricing models. It is the indispensable resource for academics and publishers that addresses the new challenges resulting from changes in technology and funding and from innovations in production and publishing.
期刊最新文献
A Bibliometric Analysis of Book Reviews Published in Translation Journals between 2010 and 2021 Reimagining the Covering Letter: Why, When, and How to Communicate with Journal Editors before Manuscript Submission Publishing during Doctoral Candidature: Policies, Practices, and Identities by Jun Lei Are Differences in Research Performance Creating a Glass Ceiling for Women Faculty in Business Schools? Global Shift, Seventh Edition: Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy by Peter Dicken
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1