PolyStokes: A Polynomial Model Reduction Method for Viscous Fluid Simulation

Jonathan Panuelos, Ryan Goldade, E. Grinspun, D. Levin, Christopher Batty
{"title":"PolyStokes: A Polynomial Model Reduction Method for Viscous Fluid Simulation","authors":"Jonathan Panuelos, Ryan Goldade, E. Grinspun, D. Levin, Christopher Batty","doi":"10.1145/3592146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Standard liquid simulators apply operator splitting to independently solve for pressure and viscous stresses, a decoupling that induces incorrect free surface boundary conditions. Such methods are unable to simulate fluid phenomena reliant on the balance of pressure and viscous stresses, such as the liquid rope coil instability exhibited by honey. By contrast, unsteady Stokes solvers retain coupling between pressure and viscosity, thus resolving these phenomena, albeit using a much larger and thus more computationally expensive linear system compared to the decoupled approach. To accelerate solving the unsteady Stokes problem, we propose a reduced fluid model wherein interior regions are represented with incompressible polynomial vector fields. Sets of standard grid cells are consolidated into super-cells, each of which are modelled using a quadratic field of 26 degrees of freedom. We demonstrate that the reduced field must necessarily be at least quadratic, with the affine model being unable to correctly capture viscous forces. We reproduce the liquid rope coiling instability, as well as other simulated examples, to show that our reduced model is able to reproduce the same fluid phenomena at a smaller computational cost. Futhermore, we performed a crowdsourced user survey to verify that our method produces imperceptible differences compared to the full unsteady Stokes method.","PeriodicalId":7077,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)","volume":"31 1","pages":"1 - 13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3592146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Standard liquid simulators apply operator splitting to independently solve for pressure and viscous stresses, a decoupling that induces incorrect free surface boundary conditions. Such methods are unable to simulate fluid phenomena reliant on the balance of pressure and viscous stresses, such as the liquid rope coil instability exhibited by honey. By contrast, unsteady Stokes solvers retain coupling between pressure and viscosity, thus resolving these phenomena, albeit using a much larger and thus more computationally expensive linear system compared to the decoupled approach. To accelerate solving the unsteady Stokes problem, we propose a reduced fluid model wherein interior regions are represented with incompressible polynomial vector fields. Sets of standard grid cells are consolidated into super-cells, each of which are modelled using a quadratic field of 26 degrees of freedom. We demonstrate that the reduced field must necessarily be at least quadratic, with the affine model being unable to correctly capture viscous forces. We reproduce the liquid rope coiling instability, as well as other simulated examples, to show that our reduced model is able to reproduce the same fluid phenomena at a smaller computational cost. Futhermore, we performed a crowdsourced user survey to verify that our method produces imperceptible differences compared to the full unsteady Stokes method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粘性流体模拟的多项式模型简化方法
标准液体模拟器应用算子分裂来独立求解压力和粘性应力,这种解耦会导致不正确的自由表面边界条件。这种方法无法模拟依赖于压力和粘性应力平衡的流体现象,例如蜂蜜所表现出的液体绳圈不稳定性。相比之下,非定常Stokes求解器保留了压力和粘度之间的耦合,从而解决了这些现象,尽管与解耦方法相比,使用了更大的线性系统,因此计算成本更高。为了加速求解非定常Stokes问题,我们提出了一种简化的流体模型,其中内部区域用不可压缩多项式向量场表示。标准网格单元集被合并成超级单元,每个超级单元使用26个自由度的二次场建模。我们证明了简化后的场必须至少是二次的,而仿射模型不能正确地捕捉粘性力。我们重现了液体绳卷的不稳定性,以及其他模拟例子,以表明我们的简化模型能够以更小的计算成本重现相同的流体现象。此外,我们进行了一项众包用户调查,以验证我们的方法与全非定常Stokes方法相比产生了细微的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
GeoLatent: A Geometric Approach to Latent Space Design for Deformable Shape Generators An Implicit Neural Representation for the Image Stack: Depth, All in Focus, and High Dynamic Range Rectifying Strip Patterns From Skin to Skeleton: Towards Biomechanically Accurate 3D Digital Humans Warped-Area Reparameterization of Differential Path Integrals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1