Hermeneutika Feminis: Kritik Atas Kesetaraan Fatima Mernissi

Lub Lyna Nabilata
{"title":"Hermeneutika Feminis: Kritik Atas Kesetaraan Fatima Mernissi","authors":"Lub Lyna Nabilata","doi":"10.37680/adabiya.v13i02.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cultural optics will always appear in every debate about feminism, as well as certain interpretive tendencies (read: pre-text) also involved (enveloped) and even come into play in them. Therefore, the emergence of different views even somewhat \"biased\" is considered normal. People in discussing feminism will not be able to position themselves really objectively without pretension, but can only maintain a distance from prejudices or “biases” that can unwittingly emerge. In Muslim feminist thought, they are still trapped in a crisis of interpretation and counter interpretation. This crisis arises because the methods or strategies used by opponents and supporters of gender equality in building and legitimizing each of their views are basically the same, namely by explaining certain parts of the text of the Qur’an or hadith that are appropriate and support their interests and views. The parts of the text are then considered as asl the most correct and original principles, which in turn tend to be interpreted unilaterally in accordance with their ideological interests and positions and at the same time eliminate unwanted meanings because they are contrary to their ideological interests. This eclectic reading model is caused by the inability to challenge the existing paradigm of reading the text, which does not consider the historical context, dialogical and communicative aspects of the text with its context, and its descriptive dimensions. In this article intending to criticize the interpretation of Fatima Mernissi, Mernissi seems to still have a subjective bias in assessing some of the problems of feminist interpretation regarding equality of men and women, and not occupying the core of the problem in the actual portion. As a result, this argument shows that Mernissi is still narrow in using her feminist approach, because the core feminist approach is actually sensitive to injustice and avoiding “bias” that can occur not only in gender issues, but can also occur in other areas related to sara (read: skin color, tribe, caste and others).","PeriodicalId":7695,"journal":{"name":"Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37680/adabiya.v13i02.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Cultural optics will always appear in every debate about feminism, as well as certain interpretive tendencies (read: pre-text) also involved (enveloped) and even come into play in them. Therefore, the emergence of different views even somewhat "biased" is considered normal. People in discussing feminism will not be able to position themselves really objectively without pretension, but can only maintain a distance from prejudices or “biases” that can unwittingly emerge. In Muslim feminist thought, they are still trapped in a crisis of interpretation and counter interpretation. This crisis arises because the methods or strategies used by opponents and supporters of gender equality in building and legitimizing each of their views are basically the same, namely by explaining certain parts of the text of the Qur’an or hadith that are appropriate and support their interests and views. The parts of the text are then considered as asl the most correct and original principles, which in turn tend to be interpreted unilaterally in accordance with their ideological interests and positions and at the same time eliminate unwanted meanings because they are contrary to their ideological interests. This eclectic reading model is caused by the inability to challenge the existing paradigm of reading the text, which does not consider the historical context, dialogical and communicative aspects of the text with its context, and its descriptive dimensions. In this article intending to criticize the interpretation of Fatima Mernissi, Mernissi seems to still have a subjective bias in assessing some of the problems of feminist interpretation regarding equality of men and women, and not occupying the core of the problem in the actual portion. As a result, this argument shows that Mernissi is still narrow in using her feminist approach, because the core feminist approach is actually sensitive to injustice and avoiding “bias” that can occur not only in gender issues, but can also occur in other areas related to sara (read: skin color, tribe, caste and others).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化光学总是会出现在每一次关于女权主义的辩论中,以及某些解释倾向(阅读:pre-text)也参与其中(包裹),甚至在其中发挥作用。因此,不同观点的出现甚至有些“偏颇”被认为是正常的。人们在讨论女权主义时,不可能不矫揉造作地真正客观地定位自己,而只能与可能在不知不觉中出现的偏见或“偏见”保持距离。在穆斯林女性主义思想中,她们仍然陷入阐释与反阐释的危机。这种危机的产生是因为性别平等的反对者和支持者在建立和合法化他们的观点时所使用的方法或策略基本上是相同的,即通过解释《古兰经》或圣训的某些部分,这些部分是适当的,并支持他们的利益和观点。然后,案文的各个部分被认为是最正确和最原始的原则,而这些原则又倾向于根据他们的意识形态利益和立场单方面加以解释,同时消除不需要的含义,因为它们违背了他们的意识形态利益。这种折衷的阅读模式是由于无法挑战现有的文本阅读范式而造成的,这种范式没有考虑文本的历史语境、对话和交际方面以及文本的描述维度。在这篇意在批判Fatima Mernissi解读的文章中,Mernissi在评价女性主义解读中关于男女平等的一些问题时,似乎仍然存在主观偏见,并没有在实际部分占据问题的核心。因此,这一论点表明,Mernissi在使用她的女权主义方法时仍然是狭隘的,因为核心的女权主义方法实际上是对不公正的敏感,并避免“偏见”,这种偏见不仅可能发生在性别问题上,也可能发生在与萨拉相关的其他领域(即肤色、部落、种姓等)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mahabah According to KH Hasyim Asy'ari and Its Actualization on Religious Tolerance Usage and Understanding of Archaisms in King James Bible among Clergy and Laity in Ijebu-Ode, Nigeria Language Choice in Brang Kidul Community of Ponorogo, Indonesia Penyebaran Islam dalam Khazanah Pesantren: Analisis Kitab Ahla al-Musāmarah fī Hikāyāt al-Auliyā’ al-‘Asyrah Analisis Kritis Fenomena Cancel Culture dan Ancaman terhadap Kebebasan Berekspresi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1