{"title":"L’Ukraine et la révolution de 1917: promesse d’émancipations et limites de l’indépendance","authors":"Thomas Chopard","doi":"10.3917/VING.135.0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EnglishHow did the 1917 Revolution in Ukraine turn into a properly Ukrainian revolution? Ruling out explanations that stress only the strength of local nationalism and the impetus granted by the period’s revolutionary rhythm, this article shall explain how the outlying territories of the former Russian Empire gradually distanced themselves from the centre. We shall instead focus on the Provisional Government’s repeated refusals to accommodate the cultural and political autonomy of Ukraine, which thus forced Ukrainian revolutionaries to become opponents rather than partners. At the same time, this article underscores the limits of this separation : land distribution remained incomplete, the country still had to shoulder the burden of the Army, the rights of minorities were not fully guaranteed, and Bolshevik subversion remained an issue. francaisComment la revolution de 1917 en Ukraine deboucha-t-elle sur une revolution proprement ukrainienne ? Ecartant une explication par la simple force du nationalisme et suivant le rythme de l’annee revolutionnaire, cet article explique le detachement des peripheries de l’ancien Empire russe essentiellement par les refus repetes du gouvernement provisoire central d’amenager l’autonomie culturelle et politique de l’Ukraine, forcant les revolutionnaires ukrainiens a se poser en alternative et non plus en partenaire. Dans le meme temps, l’article souligne les limites de cet arrachement : inachevement du partage des terres, poids de l’armee, droits inaboutis des minorites, subversion bolchevique.","PeriodicalId":51845,"journal":{"name":"Vingtieme Siecle-Revue d Histoire","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vingtieme Siecle-Revue d Histoire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/VING.135.0073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
EnglishHow did the 1917 Revolution in Ukraine turn into a properly Ukrainian revolution? Ruling out explanations that stress only the strength of local nationalism and the impetus granted by the period’s revolutionary rhythm, this article shall explain how the outlying territories of the former Russian Empire gradually distanced themselves from the centre. We shall instead focus on the Provisional Government’s repeated refusals to accommodate the cultural and political autonomy of Ukraine, which thus forced Ukrainian revolutionaries to become opponents rather than partners. At the same time, this article underscores the limits of this separation : land distribution remained incomplete, the country still had to shoulder the burden of the Army, the rights of minorities were not fully guaranteed, and Bolshevik subversion remained an issue. francaisComment la revolution de 1917 en Ukraine deboucha-t-elle sur une revolution proprement ukrainienne ? Ecartant une explication par la simple force du nationalisme et suivant le rythme de l’annee revolutionnaire, cet article explique le detachement des peripheries de l’ancien Empire russe essentiellement par les refus repetes du gouvernement provisoire central d’amenager l’autonomie culturelle et politique de l’Ukraine, forcant les revolutionnaires ukrainiens a se poser en alternative et non plus en partenaire. Dans le meme temps, l’article souligne les limites de cet arrachement : inachevement du partage des terres, poids de l’armee, droits inaboutis des minorites, subversion bolchevique.