The Impact of Percutaneus Tracheotomy on Patients with COVID-19 ARDS' Mortality and Length of Stay in The Critical Care Unit

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Erciyes Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.14744/etd.2023.63832
G. Alay
{"title":"The Impact of Percutaneus Tracheotomy on Patients with COVID-19 ARDS' Mortality and Length of Stay in The Critical Care Unit","authors":"G. Alay","doi":"10.14744/etd.2023.63832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of percutaneous tracheotomy on mortality and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) for patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Materials and Methods: This study included patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19-associated) acute respiratory distress syndrome who were treated with invasive mechanical ventilation in a pandemic intensive care unit. Patients admitted to the pandemic intensive care unit between March and July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent percutaneous tracheotomy and did not have a tracheotomy during the follow-up were statistically compared in terms of laboratory and clinical characteristics such as mortality and length of stay in the intensive care unit. Results: The study included 102 orotracheally intubated patients diagnosed with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. The number of tracheotomized and not-tracheotomized patients was 34 and 68, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 60.39 +/- 14.10 years. The mean time to perform percutaneous tracheotomy was 7.94 +/- 6.11 days. There was no significant difference in mortality rate between the two groups (p=0.298). However, patients who underwent tracheotomy had a longer length of stay in the intensive care unit compared to those who did not (35.00 +/- 24.60 days vs 13.20 +/- 11.69 days, p<0.001). Conclusion: Our study found no statistically significant difference in mortality rate between the two groups in our study. Additionally, the length of stay in the intensive care unit was not better in tracheotomized patients. While tracheotomy has some advantages in other severe lung diseases, its effect on mortality in patients with severe lung disease associated with COVID-19 should be evaluated further in randomized controlled trials.","PeriodicalId":43995,"journal":{"name":"Erciyes Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erciyes Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/etd.2023.63832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of percutaneous tracheotomy on mortality and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) for patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Materials and Methods: This study included patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19-associated) acute respiratory distress syndrome who were treated with invasive mechanical ventilation in a pandemic intensive care unit. Patients admitted to the pandemic intensive care unit between March and July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent percutaneous tracheotomy and did not have a tracheotomy during the follow-up were statistically compared in terms of laboratory and clinical characteristics such as mortality and length of stay in the intensive care unit. Results: The study included 102 orotracheally intubated patients diagnosed with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. The number of tracheotomized and not-tracheotomized patients was 34 and 68, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 60.39 +/- 14.10 years. The mean time to perform percutaneous tracheotomy was 7.94 +/- 6.11 days. There was no significant difference in mortality rate between the two groups (p=0.298). However, patients who underwent tracheotomy had a longer length of stay in the intensive care unit compared to those who did not (35.00 +/- 24.60 days vs 13.20 +/- 11.69 days, p<0.001). Conclusion: Our study found no statistically significant difference in mortality rate between the two groups in our study. Additionally, the length of stay in the intensive care unit was not better in tracheotomized patients. While tracheotomy has some advantages in other severe lung diseases, its effect on mortality in patients with severe lung disease associated with COVID-19 should be evaluated further in randomized controlled trials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮气管切开术对COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者死亡率和重症监护病房住院时间的影响
目的:探讨经皮气管切开术对新冠肺炎相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者死亡率和重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间的影响。材料与方法:本研究纳入了在大流行重症监护室接受有创机械通气治疗的冠状病毒病-19 (covid -19相关)急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者。回顾性回顾了2021年3月至7月期间在大流行重症监护室收治的患者。随访期间行经皮气管切开术和未行气管切开术的患者在实验室和临床特征(如死亡率和重症监护病房住院时间)方面进行统计学比较。结果:本研究纳入102例经气管插管诊断为COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征的患者。气管切开和未切开分别为34例和68例。患者平均年龄60.39±14.10岁。经皮气管切开术平均时间为7.94±6.11天。两组患者死亡率差异无统计学意义(p=0.298)。然而,与未行气管切开术的患者相比,行气管切开术的患者在重症监护病房的住院时间更长(35.00 +/- 24.60天vs 13.20 +/- 11.69天,p<0.001)。结论:本研究发现两组患者的死亡率无统计学差异。此外,气管切开术患者在重症监护病房的住院时间也不佳。虽然气管切开术在其他严重肺部疾病中具有一定优势,但其对COVID-19相关严重肺部疾病患者死亡率的影响应在随机对照试验中进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Erciyes Medical Journal
Erciyes Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Erciyes Medical Journal (Erciyes Med J) is the international, peer-reviewed, open access publication of Erciyes University School of Medicine. The journal, which has been in continuous publication since 1978, is a publication published on March, June, September, and December. The publication language of the journal is English. The journal accepts clinical and experimental research articles in different fields of medicine, original case reports, letters to the editor and invited reviews for publication. Research articles and case reports on regionally frequent and specific medical topics are prioritized. Manuscripts on national and international scientific meetings and symposiums and manuscripts sharing scientific correspondence and scientific knowledge between authors and their readers are also published.
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Prenatal, Natal, and Postnatal Histories in Children with Cerebral Palsy with and without Swallowing Disorder Von Hippel–Lindau Disease and Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum: Report of a New Possible Association Prevalence of Post-COVID-19 Syndrome and Related Factors in University Employees: A Prospective Cohort Study Panitumumab- induced paronychia and trichomegaly Is There a Relationship Between Food Addiction, Dietary Quality and Metabolic Parameters in Obese Adults?: A Cross-Sectional Study Example
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1